
Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a Trump-like personality with his extreme right supporters’ execution of its war against HAMAS in Gaza in response for its massacre within Israel on October 7, 2023, may very well end up placing US national security interests at risk.
It has been bothering me how Hamas had in its possession detailed data on how to attack over 60 targets within Israel, as much of this information isn’t public knowledge. How is it that this high level of intelligence ended up in the hands of HAMAS? How is it that so specific a 40-page detailed report by HAMAS had been in the possession of Israeli intelligence for over a year prior to the OCT 7 massacre, but Israeli leaders hadn’t been sufficiently alarmed, enough to raise multiple red flags in real time?

These questions should raise sufficient alarm bells in Washington DC to where US military and diplomatic professionals start taking more of a hardline position in their dealings with Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his right-wing contingents as their addiction to political power at all costs may place US interests in jeopardy. He cannot continue to get away with giving lip service to US officials by appearing to be listening but then acting in a counterproductive way, doing whatever he wants. The U.S. can’t afford to wait until the war is over before investigating how Hamas managed to breach Israel’s defenses so easily and with a high degree of accuracy.
As per a 10/13/2023 NYT article, “The Secrets Hamas Knew About Israel’s Military” by Patrick Kingsley and Ronen Bergman, “Hamas planning documents, videos of the assault and interviews with security officials show that the group had a surprisingly sophisticated understanding of how the Israeli military operated, where it stationed specific units, and even the time it would take for reinforcements to arrive.”
See: Why did it take Israel so long to deal with Hamas’s attack/ BBC...

Here’s a Guardian opinion piece that echos my thoughts…
As per Simon Tisdall in his December 6, 2023 Guardian opinion piece, “Biden now regrets the strength of his support for Netanyahu – he must act before its too late,” dittos my concern that the US can no longer afford to give the benefit of the doubt to Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu regarding the execution of Israel’s war against HAMAS in Gaza.
Excerpts:
“The Israeli prime minister’s post-truce bombardment and ground invasion of southern Gaza is shaping up to be even more “hellish”, in a UN official’s words, than the indiscriminate mayhem in the north that preceded it. The US president has the potential leverage and clout to rein him in where European and Arab leaders do not. Biden must take the lead.”
“It was apparent long before the 7 October Hamas terrorist attacks on southern Israel, which killed about 1,200 people, that Netanyahu and Biden were barely on speaking terms. The usual White House invitation following last autumn’s election, which brought Netanyahu’s hard-right coalition to power, was withheld.”

A principal reason was Biden’s disquiet over the extremist, anti-Palestinian policies espoused by the new government, notably in the occupied West Bank. Yet when Hamas attacked, Biden, being at heart a decent and honourable soul, set differences aside. His mistake, or perhaps his willful self-deception, was to believe Netanyahu was a man of similar mettle. Biden immediately proposed $14bn in military aid, deployed aircraft carrier battlegroups and flew to Tel Aviv. His moving speech to a grieving nation offered the sort of solace and empathy wholly foreign to Netanyahu.”
“Yet this show of almost unconditional support was promptly interpreted by Netanyahu as carte blanche to do whatever he pleased in pursuing Hamas in Gaza. His main “achievement” to date, given that the terrorists remain undefeated, is an unprecedented slaughter of Palestinian civilians, reportedly totalling nearly 16,000 deaths.”
“After initially doubting the sheer scale of the carnage, Biden has slowly adjusted his stance, issuing increasingly strongly worded calls for proportionality, access for humanitarian assistance, and respect for international law.”
“Partly he is responding to Arab pressure and fears of a wider war, partly to growing dismay among Democrats and younger voters over Netanyahu’s actions. But he does seem to have been genuinely shocked. This is not the Israel he once knew and supported for decades in Congress.”

“Yet Netanyahu and his generals, while claiming to be listening to Biden, are really not. Their terrifying, post-truce targeting of Khan Younis, southern Gaza’s biggest city and the supposed base of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, is producing mass casualties.”
“Antony Blinken, US secretary of state, told Netanyahu last week that Washington was losing patience. “The massive loss of civilian life and displacement of the scale we saw in northern Gaza [must] not be repeated in the south,” he said.”
“Blinken’s demand that Israel stop breaking international law, which it demonstrably does on a daily basis, was forcefully echoed by US vice-president Kamala Harris in Dubai. Defence secretary Lloyd Austin warned Netanyahu he was “replacing a tactical victory with a strategic defeat” by driving Palestinians into the arms of Hamas.”
“Netanyahu is within his rights to resist outside advice, even from Israel’s indispensable military, diplomatic and financial friend and partner. But that only makes sense if it serves Israel’s interest. This is the crux. From the beginning of this crisis, Netanyahu, as usual, has put his personal and political interests before his country’s.”
“After overseeing the worst security failure in 56 years, he hopes to salvage his reputation and his job by conducting a successful war – and preferably a long one. Right now, Netanyahu is deliberately, even proudly, rejecting US urgings to eschew tactics that will prospectively cause huge additional casualties in southern Gaza.”

“He continues to break promises not to obstruct aid supplies from Egypt. Meanwhile the army’s Orwellian QR code phone system for evacuating civilians to supposedly safe areas – apparently the best it can do in response to American pressure – is plainly unworkable amid telecoms blackouts.”
“More disobliging still, from the point of view of Arab neighbours and the international community, Netanyahu wants to create a permanent buffer zone in overcrowded Gazan territory. Preferring open-ended military occupation, he flatly rejects Biden’s view that the Palestinian Authority is best-placed to take charge of Gaza after the war and scoffs at talk of reviving the two-state solution.”
“On top of all that, he is ignoring, even courting, the risk of wider regional escalation – the nightmare Washington most fears. Since the Gaza truce ended on Friday, related violence has predictably flared anew from the West Bank and southern Lebanon to the Red Sea.”
“Netanyahu may calculate there is political advantage in being able to claim he “stood up” to the Americans. Biden must swiftly disabuse him of this notion – and of the bigger, pernicious idea that he can carry on prosecuting a war that collectively punishes a defenseless population, that increasingly harms US and western interests, and that’s damaging to Israel’s long-term security.”
“Biden needs to stop pleading and wheedling, spell out the concrete costs of this reckless course (including mooted US sanctions), and talk directly, as he did in October, to Israelis and the anti-Netanyahu, anti-extremist majority. Possible prime ministerial replacements include Yair Lapid and Benny Gantz. Biden must bang some heads together.”