aside Health Insurance Industry’s Undue Influence On Republicans

Image result for aetna headquarters building

Yes, there are flaws with the ACA which are imminently fixable, if there was a bipartisan consensus in the US Congress to do this. For example, the US congressional representatives could for once, adequately fund the ACA risk corridors as required, within the ACA law. Again, “risk corridors” is an insurance term and it is NOT A BAILOUT as the republicans are prone to call it. By not funding this ACA requirement as per the law in 2016, the republicans were able to deliberately cause the recent premium increases with some insurance companies having to withdraw from the ACA marketplace.

Here is a link to a Politifact report which calls Senator Rubio’s claim a lie, that funding risk insurance corridors for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is equivalent to a corporation bailout.  (Marco Rubio: We ‘wiped out’ Obamacare ‘bailout fund’) 

It is my speculation that the republicans came up with this plan to sabotage the ACA with assistance from healthcare insurance experts. This slight of hand with the ACA risk corridor required funding guaranteed that the talking points, that you have been hearing from the republicans would occur, like premium and deductible increases, along with some insurance companies with-drawing from the ACA market place exchanges. An Aetna CEO was even publicly predicting the ACA’s “death spiral.”

We have been inundated with other republican echoing the Aetna’s CEO’s words, Obamacare is on a “death spiral.” And of course, this is not true.

The words “death spiral” is a specific insurance terminology which refers to the inevitable cycle where insurance premiums keep rising dramatically as young healthy adults start dropping out of the insurance market, leaving mostly the sick and elderly on the insurance rolls, until the system collapses.

This year of 2017, there has been a record number of Americans enrolling to purchase health coverage made available through the ACA, the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare which puts the lie to the republicans’ claims that the ACA is in a “death spiral” cycle.

Editorial cartoons on Obamacare and the Republican Party and Paul RyanOn 2/15/17, Carolyn Y. Johnson of the Washington Post penned an article about the Aetna CEO, “Aetna chief executive says Obamacare is in a ‘death spiral:”


’Aetna chief executive Mark Bertolini said Wednesday (3/8/17) that the Affordable Care Act’s exchanges — the marketplaces where consumers can buy individual health coverage under President Barack Obama’s signature health-care law  — are in a “death spiral.”

“Bertolini’s remarks at theWall Street Journal’s the Future of Healthcare event  came a day after the official end of his company’s proposed merger with the health insurer Humana — a divorce that will cost Aetna a $1 billion breakup fee. It also came a day after Humana announced that it would pull out of all of its remaining ACA exchanges for 2018, arguing that the risk pool was un-balanced because not enough healthy people were signing up compared with the number of sick people.

Image result for aetna headquarters building1/24/17 Matt Egan of CNN Money wrote about the real reason Aetna withdrew from some ACA market exchanges, “Judge: “Aetna lied about quitting Obamacare.”

“A federal judge has ruled that Aetna wasn’t being truthful when the health insurer said last summer that its decision to pull out of most Obamacare exchanges was strictly a business decision triggered by mounting losses.”

Image result“U.S. District Judge John Bates concluded this week that Aetna’s real motivation for dropping Obamacare coverage in several states was “specifically to evade judicial scrutiny” over its merger with Humana.”

“Aetna pulled out of Obamacare exchanges in 11 states last August, including 17 counties in Florida, Georgia and Missouri where the Department of Justice argued the merger would wipe out competition.”

“That decision to retreat from Obamacare came just a month after the Department of Justice blocked Aetna’s $34 billion merger with Humana on antitrust grounds.”

“But Bates said this week the DOJ presented “persuasive support” — including internal Aetna emails — for the conclusion that Aetna withdrew from the Obamacare exchanges in those counties “to improve its litigation position.”

“The Court does not credit the minimal efforts of Aetna executives to claim otherwise,” Bates wrote in a ruling following a trial over the merger.”

“He added that Aetna’s decision regarding participation in the 2017 exchanges in these counties was “in fact manipulated.”

“Aetna had warned the government it may need to dump then-President Obama’s signature healthcare law if the U.S. scuttled its deal with Humana.”Image result for photos of Aetna CEO Mark Bertolini

“It is very likely that we would need to leave the public exchange business entirely…should our deal ultimately be blocked,” Aetna CEO Mark Bertolini wrote in a letter to the DOJ last July that was obtained by the Huffington Post.”

“However, Bates said it’s clear that “Aetna tried to leverage its participation in the exchange for favorable treatment” from regulators.”

“The judge said there is “persuasive evidence” that when Aetna later withdrew from the 17 counties in question, “it did not do so for business reasons, but instead to follow through on the threat that it made earlier.”Editorial cartoon on Republican Party and health care

“This critique was buried in a 158-page ruling issued by Bates on Monday, in which he blocked Aetna’s merger with Humana due to anti-competitive concerns.”

“The ruling deals a big blow to both companies at a time of great uncertainty in the health care industry now that President Donald Trump has talked about rolling back several key provisions of Obamacare.”

“Aetna-Humana isn’t the only big health care merger in doubt. The DOJ also sued to block the takeover of Cigna by Blue Cross Blue Shield leader Anthem for anti-competitive reasons.”Editorial cartoons on Obamacare and the Republican Party and health care

“Aetna declined to comment on specifics of the opinion, including the criticism from Bates, because it’s still “reviewing the details.”

“Last summer, Aetna explained its decision to withdraw from most Obamacare exchanges by saying its individual policies business had lost $430 million since the exchanges opened in January 2014.”

“However, the judge noted that Aetna kept its support for exchanges in money-losing states like Delaware, Iowa and Virginia — but dumped Florida, even though that big state was projected to be profitable in 2016.”Editorial cartoon on the Republican Party and Obamacare

“The ruling quoted an email from Christopher Ciano, president of Aetna’s Florida market, to Jonathan Mayhew, head of Aetna’s exchange business, showing how stunned he was by the decision to leave Florida.”

“I just can’t make sense out of the Florida decision. Never thought we would pull the plug all together,” Ciano wrote, adding that Aetna was “making money from the on-exchange business.”

“Mayhew responded by requesting to discuss by phone “instead of email.”

“Bates said the response from the senior Aetna exec was an example of Aetna’s “repeated efforts to conceal a paper trail about this decision-making.”


  1. Gronda, good research and post. Two additional comments.

    Because of Congress’ reneging on funding the risk corridors, Humana lost $591 million for adverse selection. Unlike other carriers, they believed Congress would honor their commitment, so they priced that expectation into its premiums. When they were officially stiffed by Congress, they wrote off $591. million. Other carriers increased their premiums by more, which was the GOP’s hope, so they could point to the increase in premiums. As we discussed, why the press does not highlight this subterfuge is a disservice.

    The other issue is now that Aetna has bailed on many markets, they want the ACA to fail. They want to go to a system where they can now sell more product on their terms. Hence the use of the term death spiral by the Aetna CEO. I had a chance to sign up with Aetna this year, but chose another carrier because of their stance. They left me high and dry last year after buying Coventry, so when I had a choice between them and another carrier, I chose the other one. Keith

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Keith,

      As usual, thanks a million for the added information.

      I am certain that it was the insurance experts, lobbyists who whispered in the republican legislators ears about taking this tactic.

      The republicans are eliminating all the taxes associated with Obamacare which helps the wealthy.

      Ciao, Gronda


      • Yes, they are. Here is where Nick Hanauer, the venture capitalist, chimes in. The wealthy will sit on the money and not spend it. Without healthcare, the lower income folks will spend less, since they will have to spend more on healthcare and without the safety net. This is a key reason the repeal will be retrenching toward the economy. Keith

        Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.