aside How An Election Victory Was Stolen From Hillary Clinton

Image result for photos of hillary clinton
Hillary Clinton

This blog covers a plausible theory of how the NYC FBI along with Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater and brother of Betsy Devos, and the former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani conspired to steal the election from the democratic presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton in order to catapult their man, the republican Donald Trump into the White House.

On 1/17/17, Seth Abramson of the Huffington Post penned the following article,The Domestic Conspiracy That Gave Trump The Election Is In Plain Sight.”


“Information presently public and available confirms that Erik Prince, Rudy Giuliani, and Donald Trump conspired to intimidate FBI Director James Comey into interfering in, and thus directly affecting, the 2016 presidential election. This conspiracy was made possible with the assistance of officers in the NY Police Department and agents within the NYC field office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.”

Image result for photos of giuliani trump and erik prince
Erik Prince (R)

“All of the major actors in the conspiracy have already confessed to its particulars either in word or in deed; moreover, all of the major actors have publicly exhibited consciousness of guilt after the fact. This assessment has already been the subject of articles in news outlets on both sides of the political spectrum, but has not yet received substantial investigation by major media.”

“While a full summary of the Prince-Giuliani-Trump conspiracy would require a longer discourse, the actions of these men, along with multiple still-anonymous actors, can be summarized in five paragraphs. It will be for journalists with more resources than this writer to follow up on these leads—and, moreover, to see how this domestic conspiracy dovetails with the Trump-Russia controversy, though this too is briefly addressed below.”

Image result for photos of james comey1. “As reported by the New York Times, FBI Director James Comey released his now-infamous October 27th letter in substantial part because he had determined that “word of the new emails (found on Anthony Weiner’s computer)…was sure to leak out.” Comey worried that if the leak occurred at a time when the nature and evidentiary value of the “new” emails was unknown, he “risked being accused of misleading Congress and the public ahead of an election.” By October 27th, the FBI had had access to Weiner’s computer—which it originally received from NYPD—since October 3rd, during which interval the Bureau had both the time and IT know-how to determine that the “new” emails in its possession were in fact duplicate emails from accounts already revealed to the Bureau by Clinton, her aide Huma Abedin, and the State Department.”

Image result for photos of james comey“However, when Comey was briefed on the case by agents from the New York field office on October 26th, he discovered that not only had this IT work not been done, but in fact no warrant to seize the full emails had been sought, no permission to read the emails had been requested from cooperating witnesses Weiner and Abedin, and indeed nothing but a summary of the emails’ “meta-data” (non-content header information) had been prepared by his agents. The result of this investigative nonfeasance was that Comey feared he would not be able to get a warrant for the emails and confirm them as duplicates prior to Election Day—a fact that would allow anti-Clinton elements within NYPD and the FBI, and Trump surrogates and advisers with sources in these organizations, to mischaracterize the “new” emails in a way that would swing the election to Trump. As long as the Clinton investigation remained open, Comey would not be able to respond to such misinformation; his only hope of keeping public discussion of the “new” emails within the sphere of reality was to use the cover of a prior promise to Congress to speak publicly about an ongoing investigation—and then close that investigation in short order.”

2. “The effort to intimidate Comey into publicly commenting on the Clinton case—a win-win scenario for Trump, as either a comment from Comey or silence from Comey (the latter coupled with inaccurate, Hatch Act-violative leaks by the FBI, NYPD, and/or the Trump campaign) would sink Clinton—began concurrent to Comey’s October 26th briefing on the Clinton case. In an October 25th Fox & Friends appearance and an October 26th appearance on Fox News with Martha McCallum, Rudy Giuliani, one of Trump’s closest advisers, began teasing an October “surprise” which, Giuliani said, would turn the tide against Hillary Clinton. He refused to say what the forthcoming surprise would be, but he indicated that it would be coming in just a few days.”

Image result for photos of erik prince“Meanwhile, Erik Prince—the founder of Blackwater private security, one of Trump’s biggest donors, a conspiracy theorist who’d previously accused Huma Abedin of being a terrorist in the employ of the Muslim Brotherhood, and a man who blamed Clinton family friend and former Clinton Chief of Staff Leon Panetta for outing him as a CIA asset in 2009—was positioning himself to play an important role. Just as Giuliani had boasted on the Mark Larson radio program on October 28th that he had sources within the FBI—active agents—who had told him of virulent anti-Clinton sentiment in the New York field office and an internal rebellion against Comey’s July decision not to indict Clinton, Prince claimed to have sources within the Weiner investigation who were illegally leaking information to him. In Prince’s case, the sources were within NYPD, and the information he relayed from them to Breitbart News on November 4th—when it was not yet known that Comey, the next day, would reveal the “new” Clinton emails to be duplicates—turned out to be almost entirely false. The full extent of Prince’s lies on November 4th, all of which were Trump campaign disinformation delivered by an adviser and major donor to the campaign, are too numerous and spectacular to list here. Two brief quotes from Breitbart’s interview with Prince should suffice:”

“Prince claimed he had insider knowledge of the investigation that could help explain why FBI Director James Comey had to announce he was reopening the investigation into Clinton’s email server last week….”[NYPD] found a lot of other really damning criminal information [on Weiner’s computer], including money laundering, including the fact that Hillary went to this sex island with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Bill Clinton went there more than twenty times. Hillary Clinton went there at least six times,” he said. “The amount of garbage that they found in these emails, of criminal activity by Hillary, by her immediate circle, and even by other Democratic members of Congress, was so disgusting they gave it to the FBI, and they said, ‘We’re going to go public with this if you don’t reopen the investigation and you don’t do the right thing with timely indictments,’” Prince explained. “I believe—I know, and this is from a very well-placed source of mine at One Police Plaza in New York—the NYPD wanted to do a press conference announcing the warrants and the additional arrests they were making in this investigation, and they’ve gotten huge pushback, to the point of coercion, from the Justice Department.”

Image result for photos of james comey
Anthony Weiner (L)

“Virtually all of this is untrue. Prince continued:”

“So NYPD first gets that computer. They see how disgusting it is. They keep a copy of everything, and they pass a copy on to the FBI, which finally pushes the FBI off their chairs, making Comey reopen that investigation, which was indicated in the letter last week. The point being, NYPD has all the information, and they will pursue justice within their rights if the FBI doesn’t. There is all kinds of criminal culpability through all the emails they’ve seen of that 650,000, including money laundering, underage sex, pay-for-play, and, of course, plenty of proof of inappropriate handling, sending/receiving of classified information, up to Special Access Programs….The point being, fortunately, it’s not just the FBI; five different offices are in the hunt for justice, but the NYPD has it as well….From what I understand, up to the commissioner or at least the chief level in NYPD, they wanted to have a press conference, and DOJ, Washington people, political appointees have been exerting all kinds of undue pressure on them to back down….This kind of evil, this kind of true dirt on Hillary Clinton—look, you don’t have to make any judgments. Just release the emails. Just dump them. Let them out there. Let people see the light of truth.”

Image result for photos of erik prince“Prince’s statements of November 4th—whether given with the knowledge that they were untrue or without any knowledge of their accuracy whatsoever—underscore the sort of disinformation Comey feared would be given to voters, and, more importantly, believed by voters, if he did not complete his investigation into the duplicate emails and announce his findings before Election Day. This alone explains his deviation from FBI protocol prohibiting discussion of open cases (and announcements regarding major investigations within two months of a general election).”

3. “It seems clear that Giuliani, who was the top surrogate for the Trump campaign and in near-daily contact with the candidate, acted under orders from Trump, and that Prince either acted under orders from Trump or Steve Bannon—well-known to Prince from their mutual association with, and financial investment in, Breitbart and its ownership, including Robert Mercer —and, moreover, that all those associated with the conspiracy were subsequently rewarded. Erik Prince’s sister, Betsy DeVos, was named Education Secretary by Trump, despite having no experience for the job other than advocating sporadically for charter schools in Michigan. Prince himself was named a shadow adviser to Trump, even though, by November 8th, the fact that his statements to Breitbart had been part of a domestic disinformation campaign was clear.”

Image result for photos of giuliani trump and erik prince
Giuliani (R)

“Prince is so close to Trump that he appears to have been present at the election-night returns-watching party to which Trump invited only close friends; Prince’s wife posted pictures of the event. Giuliani, originally assured  a Cabinet position and then separated from the Trump team entirely—perhaps as punishment for his carelessness on Fox News—was then given a highly lucrative but substance-free position within the administration on the same day, January 12th, that the DOJ announced that the Inspector General would be investigating the sequence of events comprising the Prince-Giuliani-Trump conspiracy. Inspector General Horowitz noted that within his brief was investigation of the series of leaks that occurred between the NYPD, the FBI, and outside entities—including, we can surmise based on context, the Trump campaign.”

4. “Both polling, poll analysis, and internet meta-data and (see below) confirm that the Comey Letter was sufficient to hand Trump the 77,143 combined votes in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania that won him the election. We know from the statements made by Giuliani, and from numerous statements made by Trump on the campaign trail, that both men believed the Clinton email server case could be leveraged to ensure Clinton’s defeat in November. It turns out they were correct.”



  1. With his dubious past, how did Erik Prince even qualify for a security clearance? (see link below as an example) I actually can’t understand that with as much evidence is sitting there in plain sight that more people are not screaming for an investigation of the activities of the tRump campaign leading up to the day of the election. I know that this nation has the NASCAR syndrome where in all that matters is the win, and what allowed the win is of no consequence, however is that thought pattern possessed by the majority of our citizens?
    I’m going to ask a question now that to the best of my knowledge has not been asked anywhere, has anyone given any thought about the possibility that King tRump came up with the idea for the “great Mexican wall” at the urging of Prince? Remember the discussion about how it would require an almost military presence to make it actually work? Could this be yet another one of those Republican payback schemes like we saw for a former vice president? Ok, I suppose this was a little bit off topic, but when you look at the total picture you might realize that it really is not, considering at some point a private army might be extremely important if the King wants to keep his Russian owners happy, and his own skin in power!–crusade-wipe-Muslims.html

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Crustyolemothman,

      Remember, there was not just Erik Prince involved with a dubious past. DT has a habit of surrounding himself with folks like this. There was also the ex assistant head of the NYC FBI Kollstrom who had the reputation of having covered up the real cause of the TWA 800 airplane explosion.

      Ciao, Gronda.


      • I have to agree that we have more people with dubious pasts within the inner circle of King tRumps court then simply Erik Prince! I suppose the reason I high lighted that man is his ability to muster an army to defend the King if they felt the need. Perhaps my concern has no basis, but non the less, I can’t help but consider the possibility of tRump seizing total power if he feels threatened. Perhaps I am wrong?

        Liked by 1 person

        • Dear Crustyolemothman,

          You are right in that he would love to be granted total power.

          But there are so many obstacles like the IC community and the news media that he has dished. Then there are those pesky protesters and critics. Then the courts have not rubber stamped his travel bans.

          He is learning the hard way that this is not Russia.

          Ciao, Gronda


    • Dear Kim,

      It is going to take the grass root folks calling, emailing writing legislators, doing protests, going to legislator offices like we did with the ACA bill.This is too important.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Would it be OK if I cross-posted this article to I’ll be sure to give you complete credit as the author. There is not fee, I’m simply trying to add more content diversity for our community and I liked what you wrote. If “OK” please let me know via email.


    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.