I have made it known in several of my past blogs that I am personally convinced that all of the republican President Donald Trump’s bizarre bromance with Russia is due to him being highly motivated to have the 2014 sanctions lifted which were imposed on Russia due its unprovoked incursion into Crimea, Ukraine.
It is my contention that somehow, both the president and his Secretary of State Rex Tillerson as Exxon’s former CEO, stand to benefit financially if these sanctions were lifted which would be contrary to the US national security interests.
Mr. Tillerson’s interests are due to Exxon potentially benefiting by lifting Russian sanctions:
Around 2012, Exxon CEO Rex Tillerson had been hard at work, negotiating and closing on a deal with Russia’s oil company Rosneft for oil exploration and drilling in the arctic area, valued by experts at upwards of $500 billion dollars. This deal granted Exxon access to explore in Russia’s Arctic area, the right to drill in Siberia and the chance to explore in the deep waters of Russia’s Black Sea. As luck would have it, the very first well that was constructed in the Artic was a bonanza beyond what anyone had imagined. But this steak of good fortune ended because of the 2014 sanctions enacted against Russia.
President Trump’s Possible interest:
Within Mr Christopher Steele’s dossier presented to the FBI in summer 2016, there is a reference to Rosneft which is as follows:
“In terms of the substance of their discussion, Sechin’s associate said that the Rosneft President was so keen to lift personal and corporate western sanctions imposed on the company, that he offered (Carter) Page/Trump associates the brokerage of up to a 19 per cent (privatised) stake in Rosneft in return. Page had expressed interest and confirmed that were Trump elected US president, then sanctions on Russia would be lifted.”
It looks like the US Senate has figured all of this out as well because it has passed a bill on 6/14/17 to prevent the president from eliminating these sanctions against Russia without prior congressional approval. This bill must also be passed by the US House of Representatives and it would need enough votes to overcome a probable presidential veto.
Here is the rest of the story…
On June 14, 2017, Elana Schor of Politico penned the following report, “Senate overwhelmingly passes Russia sanctions deal with new limits on Trump:”
“The Senate on Wednesday (6/14/17) overwhelmingly approved a bipartisan package of new Russia sanctions that also lets Congress block President Donald Trump from easing or ending penalties against Moscow, the year’s most significant GOP-imposed restriction on the White House.”
“The 97-2 vote on the Russia sanctions plan capped a week of talks that demonstrated cross-aisle collaboration that’s become increasingly rare as Trump and the GOP push to repeal Obamacare without any Democratic votes. Senators merged the sanctions package with a bipartisan Iran sanctions bill that’s on track for passage as soon as this week, complicating the politics of any future veto threat from the Trump administration.”
“It’s particularly significant that a bipartisan coalition is seeking to reestablish Congress, not the president, as the final arbiter of sanctions relief, considering that this administration has been too eager — far too eager, in my mind — to put sanctions relief on the table,” Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), who pressed hard for the strongest possible anti-Russia bill, said in a floor speech. “These additional sanctions will also send a powerful, bipartisan statement that Russia and any other nation who might try to interfere with our elections will be punished.”
“But the Senate’s deal faces a murky future in the House and with the White House, which has yet to say where it stands on congressional review of sanctions that would tie Trump’s hands on future relations with Vladimir Putin’s government.”
“Secretary of State Rex Tillerson declined to endorse the deal for a second straight day on Wednesday while emphasizing the importance of “a constructive dialogue” with Russia. Although “Russia must be held accountable for its meddling in U.S. elections,” Tillerson told House Foreign Affairs Committee members, “I would urge Congress to ensure any legislation allows the president to have the flexibility to adjust sanctions to meet the needs of what is always an evolving diplomatic situation.”
“Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), a leading negotiator of the sanctions deal and a Tillerson ally, said earlier this week that he believed the legislation would get Trump’s signature. Democrats, however, are also wary of House GOP attempts to change their popular, bipartisan agreement to punish Putin.”
“I know that some people in the White House are pushing back” on the Senate sanctions framework, Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown, the Banking Committee’s top Democrat and another key player in the talks, told reporters. “People in the White House, we hear, are making calls in the House to try to stop it, slow it, weaken it, dilute it.”
“The deal, which adds new sanctions against Russia’s defense and military-intelligence sectors while codifying existing sanctions into law, drew opposition only from GOP Sens. Mike Lee of Utah and Rand Paul of Kentucky. Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland missed the vote.”
“Arizona Sen. John McCain, among the upper chamber’s strongest Russia hawks, rallied support among fellow Republicans for striking back after Russia’s cyber-attacks during the 2016 election — which Trump has dismissed repeatedly in the past.”
“Vladimir Putin’s brazen attack on our democracy is a flagrant demonstration of his disdain and disrespect for our nation,” McCain said on the floor ahead of the vote. “This should not just outrage every American, but it should compel us to action.”