aside Why Is Congress Asking US Agencies For Kaspersky Lab Cyber Documents?

Image result for photos richard engel and eugene kasperskyIn the past, I have personally used the computer anti-virus program by Kapersky. For some reason this Russian company has come under scrutiny by the US Congress.

This weekend I was watching a MSNBC special titled, “On Assignment with Richard Engel,” where during an interview in Moscow he was questioning Eugene Kaspersky whose Kaspersky Lab anti-virus software is widely used around the world, including the United States, and who has come under increasing scrutiny and suspicion for his ties to Russian intelligence. Mr. Kaspersky denied that his business takes any any offensive action on behalf of the Russian government but that it does fight cyber-crime on behalf of Russia.

Image result for photos of sen jeanne shaheenAt a meeting where all the Directors of the different US Intelligence were present, all said they would never consider using Kaspersky software. The US Congress is acting to enact legislation to insure that no US government agency uses the Kaspersky software.

Richard Engel interviewed Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) who sits on the US Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee about the interest in Kasperesky. She responded that with several classified investigations into the company’s ties to FSB (Russian Intelligence) and the Russian government, that she cannot say with certainty that this company cooperated with Russia to meddle into the 2016 US elections process, but that there is concern.

In 2014, Kaspersky Lab opened an office in Virginia specifically for the purpose to soliciting business with the US government.

Image result for photos richard engel and eugene kasperskyHere is the rest of the story…

On July 28, 2017, Dustin Volz of Reuters penned the following report, “Exclusive: Congress asks U.S. agencies for Kaspersky Lab cyber documents.”


“A U.S. congressional panel this week (7/24/17) asked 22 government agencies to share documents on Moscow-based cyber firm Kaspersky Lab, saying its products could be used to carry out “nefarious activities against the United States,” according to letters seen by Reuters.”

“The requests made on Thursday by the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space and Technology are the latest blow to the antivirus company, which has been countering accusations by U.S. officials that it may be vulnerable to Russian government influence.”

Related image“The committee asked the agencies for all documents and communications about Kaspersky Lab products dating back to Jan. 1, 2013, including any internal risk assessments. It also requested lists of any systems that use Kaspersky products and the names of any U.S. government contractors or subcontractors that do so.”

“Kaspersky has repeatedly denied that it has ties to any government and said it would not help any government with cyber espionage. It said there is no evidence for the accusations made by U.S. officials.”

The committee “is concerned that Kaspersky Lab is susceptible to manipulation by the Russian government, and that its products could be used as a tool for espionage, sabotage, or other nefarious activities against the United States,” wrote the panel’s Republican chairman, Lamar Smith, in the letters.

Related image
General Flynn was a guest speaker at a Kaspersky event.

“They were sent to all Cabinet-level agencies, including the Department of Commerce and Department of Homeland Security, as well as the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, among others.”

“A committee aide told Reuters the survey was a “first step” designed to canvas the U.S. government and that more action may follow depending on the results. The committee asked for responses by Aug. 11.”

“Kaspersky Lab, founded in 1997 and now counts over 400 million global customers, has tried largely in vain to become a vendor to the U.S. government, one of the world’s biggest buyers of cyber tools.”

Image result for photos richard engel and eugene kasperskyLongstanding suspicions about the company grew in the United States when U.S.-Russia relations deteriorated following Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea and later when U.S. intelligence agencies determined that Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election using cyber means.”

“U.S. intelligence chiefs in May publicly expressed doubt about the safety of Kaspersky products for the first time, although they offered no specific evidence of any wrongdoing. The government is reviewing how many agencies use software from Kaspersky Lab.”

“In June, FBI agents visited the homes of Kaspersky employees as part of a counterintelligence probe, two sources familiar with the matter said. The Trump administration also took steps to remove Kaspersky from a list of approved government vendors.”

Image result for photos of kaspersky lab officesA defense spending policy bill advancing in the U.S. Senate would prohibit the Department of Defense from using Kaspersky products.”

“Kaspersky employees attending the annual Black Hat conference in Las Vegas this week appeared to be largely taking the setbacks in stride. The company cheekily hosted a party at the “Red Square” restaurant and bar, where it invited attendees to don fur coats before entering a vodka freezer to enjoy high-end imported bottles of alcohol.”

“On Tuesday, the company launched a free, global version of its antivirus software, saying in a blog post that it would help “secure the whole world.”

NOTE: This blog was last updated on July 31, 2017.


    • Dear Suzanne,

      Good point! And I updated my blog, accordingly. Richard Engel did interview Sen. Jeanne Shaheen who sits on the Foreign Relations Committee because she has access to classified data. There are several classified investigations looking into Kaspersky Lab’s ties to Russia’s FSB and its government and whether it assists Russia with offensive operations, counter to US interests..

      Hugs, Grona


    • Dear Horty,

      Yes, the Richard Engel’s episode is a must watch for us, non-Trump voters. I have used Kaspersky as well, but I do not worry because there is little of value that I have that is worth hacking.But there should not be a US government agency using this service. It bothers me that Kaspersky started up in VA in 2014 before all the hacks occurred that we have been reading about in the papers.

      As always, thanks a million times over for all of your support and for this reblog.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 1 person

  1. Kaspersky provides solid anti-virus protection and is reputable enough to be trusted on the consumer level. I agree that world gov’ts should not rely on foreign software/ hardware firms which may compromise national security.

    Kaspersky claims he does not interfere with world gov’t operations, and is willing to turn over the company’s source code to US government for review.

    The company seems forthright and sincere, I think Kaspersky should testify before Congress and clarify security concerns and hacking suspicions.


    • Dear !EarthUnited,

      On a consumer level, I don’t see a problem. As to if they have taken offensive measures on behalf of Russia, I’ll wait for the IC results as I’m of the not trust and verify camp of thinkers.

      I’ve read Eugene Kaspersky comments where he is ready to turn over its source code to US government. But I still would want IC community’s evaluation after its investigations is completed to give them the benefit of the doubt.

      “We the people” are paying too heavy a price for Russia’s interference into our elections.While I love Russia and its peoples, I do not feel kindly towards President Putin and his cohorts.

      Hugs, Gronda


  2. In the shadow world of one nation trying to influence the affairs of another nation it would be surprising for a government not to try and utilise the resources of one of its national companies which has proved successful in the international sphere even at low and relatively harmless level.
    It is logical therefore to assume that there is a chance Kaspersky is a willing or unwilling partner of the Russian government’s extra-national activities.
    It may sound fearfully cynical but it’s what folk would expect from their nation.
    And so it would be expected that a US government should be careful of any dealings it may have with said company.
    Usually all this would be carried on in the time-honoured background worlds of diplomacy, intelligence work and of course trade. it is only because of the ham-fisted incumbent in your Whitehouse that such a high profile has arisen.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Roger,

      You always make too much sense. It is only reasonable that US government not use an anti-virus software sold by an Russian company. i’m willing to bet that Russian government agencies use Yandex instead of Google.

      Now that I think about it, I may do some further research on this subject.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.