aside Nun To The Rescue/ Asks Rep Paul Ryan The Tough Question At A CNN Townhall Meeting

This is a story about Sister Erica Jordan who attended a CNN town hall forum meeting where the republican US House Speaker Paul Ryan, of the  Catholic faith, was present. He was there to answer questions posed to him by members in the audience. Once Sister Jordan had her turn, she courageously questioned him about his lack of moral leadership, as when he was pushing passage for a republican healthcare bill and the anticipated tax reform/ tax cut proposal that’s literally cruel to the poor.

In the recent past, many of Representative Ryan’s constituents in Wisconsin had been complaining about how he appeared to be deliberately holding a town hall meeting.


Here’s Sister jordan’s question:

How does Ryan square his Catholic religion, with upholding the Church’s teaching that God is always on the side of the poor and dispossessed?

“After this town hall event where this fearless Catholic nun exposed and shamed Paul Ryan, as he so richly deserved, she has received a lot of favorable attention. Sister Jordan asked the question we all would have loved to do ourselves.”


Here is the rest of the story…

Recommended by DailyKos:

“Charles Pierce has a great article about Ryan’s exchange with the Catholic nun and he answers Ryan’s questions below beautifully, revealing Ryan’s disgusting hypocrisy about fighting poverty. A few of Pierce’s responses are in bold.”

Read the entire article. It’s real good.

QUESTION: “Good evening, Mr. Speaker. I know that you’re Catholic, as am I, and it seems to me that most of the Republicans in the Congress are not willing to stand with the poor and working class as evidenced in the recent debates about health care and the anticipated tax reform. So I’d like to ask you how you see yourself upholding the church’s social teaching that has the idea that God is always on the side of the poor and dispossessed, as should we be.”

RYAN: Spoken like a great Dominican nun. Look…

Patronizing? Check.

RYAN: “So the status quo isn’t working, Sister. And what I think we need to do is change our approach on fighting poverty instead of measuring success based on how much money we spend or how many programs we create or how many people are on those programs, you know, measuring on inputs. Let’s measure success in poverty on outcomes. Is it working? Are people getting out of poverty?”

“Well, since, for example, the House budget cuts food stamps by almost $200 million from the food stamp program, one way people might get out of poverty is by starving to death. You will note, by the way, that we are now a loooooonnnng way from the 25thchapter of Matthew.”

RYAN: “And what I believe, when you look at it that way — actually, I have a commission that Patty Murray and I set up that’s underway right now to focus on these measurements. We need to make sure that we bring people into the workforce. The poverty — the poor are being marginalized and misaligned in many ways because a lot of the programs that we have, well intended as they may be, are discouraging and dis-incentivizing work.”

“OK, so here is what I don’t get. First of all, a great many poor people work their asses off, and in the private sector, too, and they’re being patronized by a guy who hasn’t spent 15 seconds in the private sector since he went away to college. His family got rich building roads on government contracts. His father died, and he went through high school on Social Security’s survivor benefits, a program that the budget proposed by the president* would eviscerate. Since then, he’s been a congressional aide and a congressman. My question is that, when he was going through high school on my nickel, and the nickels of millions of other Americans, including the poorer ones, why wasn’t he “disincentivized”? How did he avoid the terrible trap of the government “hammock”?


On August 24, 2017, John Gehring of Commonweal penned the following report, “The Catholic Sister Who Challenged Paul Ryan on CNN.”


An Interview with Sister Jordan

“Earlier this week, Sister Erica Jordan asked House Speaker Paul Ryan a pointed question during a CNN town hall forum.  Her question—and the Speaker’s answer—attracted a flurry of commentary and social media buzz. “A Catholic Nun Schooled Paul Ryan in Humility Last Night,” read a headline in Esquire magazine. The retired educator and principal has been a sister for 55 years. She is an advocate for immigrants who once a week visits the Kenosha County Detention Center in Wisconsin, where Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) rents space for immigrant detainees. A member of the Sinsinawa Dominican Sisters, Jordan describes herself as a “news junkie” who watches MSNBC, listens to National Public Radio, never misses PBS Newshour and often records the Sunday morning political shows. “There is something about being a Dominican that makes you want to soak in knowledge,” she said. “My mother said when I started going to a Dominican high school they were ruining me because they were making me so opinionated. My senior year I was thinking of going into a particular convent but then I found out the sisters were not allowed to read newspapers. I said, ‘Oh, no that is not for me.’

” Commonweal contributing editor John Gehring interviewed Sister Jordan over the phone.”

John Gehring: “You asked Speaker Ryan a challenging question that called out Republicans for not standing with the poor and working class. Why was it important for you to ask this particular question?”

Sister Jordan: “It’s unconscionable that our elected officials feel free to do what they’re doing right now taking away health care, threatening Social Security and Medicare. It is just wrong. Speaker Ryan is a leader and he seems to be totally complicit in this way of thinking. I want him to really think about my question. I’ve been so distressed by this Congress and going through what we did during the health-care debate. There is such a disregard for the common good and the poor. It makes me angry. I do believe he is a man of faith, but I think he is misguided.”

JG: “Ryan said he believes that both of you share the same core principles of wanting to help the poor and provide quality health care. But he said there is “prudential judgement in processing our faith.” For him, he said, that means “mobility, economic growth, equality of opportunity.” What did you think of that answer?”


SJ: “Those are all good things but you can’t take supports away from people who are vulnerable, sick, need health care, and can’t pay premiums. I think he is really naive. Trickle-down economics has never worked. The budget is cutting programs in a way that hurts the poor. I wonder how often he talks to poor people. I don’t think he has much opportunity to really talk to people who are struggling. I felt he was pretty condescending. He started his answer by saying “spoken like a great Dominican nun.” It felt like a pat on the head, which is the way sometimes people treat sisters.”

JG: “Speaker Ryan cited the work of Catholic Charities USA as a “model” for the kind of approach to fighting poverty he endorses. But Catholic Charities gets nearly half its operating budget from the federal government and legislative proposals Ryan has supported would weaken this model. Sister Donna Markham, CEO of Catholic Charities USA, opposed the health-care repeal bill, saying it would “have a devastating impact on the poor, marginalized, and vulnerable in our country.” Is Ryan confused or maybe I’m missing something here?”

Related image

SJ: “His answer made me mad because it felt like he was asking the churches to take care of the poor. Not that the church will ever stop caring for the poor, but the government has to fulfill its purpose. The churches don’t have the resources to do it. It’s about priorities. The social teachings of the church talk about community. We take care of the weak and vulnerable. I think he missed something in his Catholic education. It is not just about ourselves or our families. It seems the concept of the common good has been lost.”

“I think he missed something in his Catholic education.’

JG: “Ryan said we “need to change our approach to fighting poverty. Instead of measuring success on how much money we spend or how many programs we create or how many people are on those programs, let’s measure success and poverty on outcomes.” Is that a reasonable argument?”

SJ:” It has to be both/and. Programs like vocational training and education that he talks about are good, but that doesn’t mean you pull out the survival mechanisms for people. We can’t dismantle the systems that care for people who need to be cared for. I can’t figure out why this wealthy country can’t figure this out.”

JG: “Catholic sisters have a reputation for being fearless and often savvy social-justice advocates. President Obama, for example, said health-care reform never would have passed without the advocacy of Sister Carol Keehan, the CEO of the Catholic Health Association. It takes guts to stand up  and ask a question on national TV. What is it about Catholic nuns? What’s in your drinking water or breakfast cereal?”


SJ: “It is what our lives are meant to be about. We’re supposed to stand up for what is right. We should be fearless. There is every reason to be outspoken about the Gospel. Saint Catherine of Siena said if you do what you are supposed to do you will set the world on fire. This means being willing to step outside your comfort zone and take risks.”

JG: “What kind of reaction are you getting from people who watched or read about your question?”

SJ: “At the end of the town hall, I was standing there talking to a CNN producer and all of these young women—college students—came up and told me how much they loved my question and they said someone already did a meme about me and Catholic social teaching. So far the reaction has all been positive. I’ve been surprised.”

JG: “If you could wave a magic wand and change one thing about politics right now what would it be?”

SJ: “The most important thing would be for people to have the desire to work together in spite of differences. If we could have the willingness to listen and not expect we’re going to agree on everything, but still have respect and give people a place at the table. If the wand was really magic? I would wave it and there would be a new president for us.”


    • Dear Suzanne,

      I love those who represent “we the people” well in these town-hall meetings. Sister Jordan held her own. Rep. Ryan’s answer was a superb example of obfuscation, political speak where nothing of substance was shared.

      The other night, Senator Grassley held a town hall meeting where a gentleman refused to back down from making it clear that he wanted the entire transcript of the hearing where Sen Grassley interviewed Mr. Glenn Simspson about the infamous Chris Steele dossier.

      Sen Grassley had been attempting to paint the entire dossier as “fake news” but this meeting backfired on these attempts. This constituent did not let him get away with even thinking about not publicly sharing this information.

      Thank you a million time over for all of your support and for this reblog.

      Hugs, Gronda


  1. Good questions. They need thoughtful answers. Shields and Brooks have noted that unlike the ACA, there is no case to be made for what the GOP tried to do. That is why no one went around talking about and why it was discussed in such a clandestine manner. Tax reform needs more open discussion. One thing that is not discussed enough is the deficit and debt impact.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Keith,

      There will be lots of folks yelling big time about the deficit and rightfully so. This is not time to give big tax cuts to the rich. Giving a tax cut to businesses who operate in the USA, especially small businesses may make sense but only to be competitive with other businesses in developed countries. There needs to be prudence.

      Hugs, Gronda.


  2. Hats off to Sister Jordan!!! I’m glad to see her story being well publicized … the people of this country need to see things like this, to understand that the GOP actually have no good answers for their actions and that their agenda has little, if anything, to do with the well-being of We The People! Sister Jordan is another one whose hand I would like to shake!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Jill,

      Sister Jordan is right in anticipating that the future republican tax reform/ tax cut bill will also be cruel to poor folks. I am expecting no less.

      Many of these representatives claim to be peoples of faith. You could have fooled me! Talk about wolves in sheep’s clothing.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.