aside President Referred Nominee To Be A Federal Judge Who Is Rated “Unqualified” By ABA

Image result for photos of Steven Grasz

You would think that the republican President Donald J. Trump’s administration with the republican legislators would suffer some hesitancy to refer for confirmation by the US Senate Judiciary Committee, an an attorney for a federal judgeship who has been unanimously rated “unqualified’ by a 14 member panel of the American Bar Association.

The above parties’ response to this rating has been to question the obvious bias of those who provided the rating. Both republican US Senators from Nebraska have highly recommended the attorney from their state, Leonard Steven Grasz.

A per a 10/31/17 Law Newz report by Ronn Blitzer,  Nebraska Senator Ben Sasse, who supports Grasz’s nomination, spoke out against the ABA’s conclusion. “It’s sad that the ABA would contort their ratings process to try to tarnish Steve’s professional reputation in order to drive a political agenda,” he said to the Omaha World-Herald. “In more than a decade as chief deputy attorney general, whether he was litigating cases before the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington or the Nebraska Supreme Court in Lincoln, Republicans and Democrats alike knew that Steve represented Nebraska with integrity and professionalism.”

Image result for photos of senators ben sasse and deb fischer

“Senator Deb Fischer, who also supports the nomination, said that Grasz is “highly respected” by people on both sides of the aisle.”

“The (ABA) recommendation came after an evaluator submitted an informal report based on more than 180 interviews, including one with Grasz. As is custom when an informal report deems a nominee Not Qualified, a second evaluator conducted a series of interviews and wrote a report. Both evaluators’ reports then went to the committee, which voted unanimously (with one abstention) that Grasz is Not Qualified.”

What the US Senate Judiciary Committee has decided to do after holding an initial hearing is to interview the ABA evaluators around 11/15/17.  I have already purchased the popcorn to see this show.

Image result for photos of Steven Grasz

Here is the rest of the story….

On November 1, 2017, Jennifer Bendery of the Huffington Post penned the following report, “Trump Court Pick Rated ‘Not Qualified’ Sits Through Humiliating Senate Hearing.” (“You’re the first Circuit Court nominee since 2006 to get this awful ABA rating? Yep, says Leonard Steven Grasz.”)

“Two days after the American Bar Association rated Leonard Steven Grasz “not qualified” to be a judge, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a confirmation hearing Wednesday (11/1/17) for Grasz’s nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit.”

“It was brutal.”


“With Grasz sitting in front of the committee, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) read aloud passages from the ABA’s eight-page statement outlining why Grasz earned such a terrible and rarely designated rating by the nation’s premier legal society.”

“I assume you’re keenly aware that you are the first Circuit Court nominee since 2006 to receive a unanimous ‘not qualified’ rating from the ABA?” Whitehouse asked Grasz. “And that the last nominee who had such a rating was withdrawn?”

Related image

“That is my understanding, senator,” replied Grasz.

“It only got worse.”

“Do you think that this is a matter as to which the committee should have no concern?” asked Whitehouse.”

“I have great respect for the amount of time and effort the American Bar Association put into the process,” said Grasz. “I respectfully disagree with the result.”


“The Rhode Island senator noted that the ABA rated Grasz “not qualified’ in a unanimous 14-0 vote. He asked Grasz if he knew that was the tally.”

“I’m not keenly aware of that,” said Grasz. “I believe there was one abstention.”

“That’s why it’s 14,” Whitehouse replied. “There are 15 of them…. It’s the full panel of 14 non-abstaining lawyers.”

“The ABA interviewed several colleagues of Grasz, who was Nebraska’s chief deputy attorney general for 11 years, as part of its evaluation of his fitness to be a judge. Some described him as “gratuitously rude.” Others expressed an “unusual fear” of consequences if they said anything bad about him because of his “deep connection and allegiance” to powerful politicians in Nebraska.”


“ABA members also raised concerns that Grasz would be “unable to separate his role as an advocate from that of a judge,” given his record on such issues as abortion. Among other things, he defended Nebraska’s ban on partial-birth abortion, and, in a 1999 article, he argued that lower courts should be able to overrule Supreme Court decisions on abortion rights because “abortion jurisprudence is, to a significant extent, a word game.”

“In sum, the evaluators and the Committee found that temperament issues, particularly bias and lack of open-mindedness, were problematic,” reads the statement submitted by Pam Bresnahan, the chair of the ABA’s standing committee that reviews nominees. “The evaluators found that the people interviewed believed that the nominee’s bias and the lens through which he viewed his role as a judge colored his ability to judge fairly.”


“White House deputy press secretary Hogan Gidley defended Grasz’s nomination.”

“Steve Grasz is an outstanding lawyer, who has the full-throated support of the President, both U.S. Senators from Nebraska, and lawyers on each side of the political spectrum,” Gidley told HuffPost in a Wednesday statement.”

“Sen. Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), who recommended Grasz to Trump, told the Senate committee she was “shocked” by the ABA rating. She said she didn’t come across “one single temperament issue” when she talked to Nebraskans about Grasz.”

“I am sad to say that, after thoroughly examining the substance of the ABA’s report, it is evident to me the ABA evaluation of Mr. Grasz was a baseless political character assassination,” Fischer said.”

“But Whitehouse pointed out that 40 of the 42 judicial nominees Trump has put forward so far have gotten “qualified” or well qualified” ratings by the ABA. (Charles Goodwin, Trump’s pick for a district court in Oklahoma, was the other nominee rated “not qualified.”)”

“It would be hard for the committee to ascribe the outcome in this case to a general partisanship of the ABA process,” said the Democratic senator. “It would not be consistent with the facts.”

Image result for photos of Steven Grasz

“It’s up to the White House to decide if it wants to plow ahead with Grasz. If the president doesn’t withdraw his nomination, the Judiciary Committee could vote to advance him to the full Senate in a matter of weeks.”

“Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who chairs the committee, said Wednesday that he invited ABA representatives to testify at a Nov. 15 hearing about their Grasz rating. They accepted.”


  1. Gronda, call me crazy, but it is not like the vote was 8 to 6. It was unanimous. I would presume the party make-up of the attorneys rating him was mixed. Either way, this is a key data point that should not be ignored. Keith

    • Dear Keith,

      As per the Law Newz reference, the first evaluator interviewed 180 different parties before writing up his report. Mr. Grasz sounds like a political insider who knows how to play politics really well but who is a lousy boss and attorney.

      If I were Mr. Grasz, I would withdraw my name.

      Hugs, Gronda


Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s