aside US Government Shut Down PACHA HIV/AIDS Council Without Explanation And Fired Staff

Image result for photos of president trump with evangelicals

It is no secret that the republican President Donald J. Trump and his republican sycophants in the White House and the US Congress have been catering bigly to their mostly White Evangelical  base. Because of their large numbers within the republican party, their power to effect policy is significant. In addition the president’s Vice President Mike Pence self identifies as an Evangelical and he has been their champion.

As per a 2016 Pew Research report, “Those who identify themselves as “born-again or evangelical” Christians constitute a sizable share of the electorate – 36% of registered voters, compared with 37% who are non-evangelical Christians and 27% who identify with non-Christian faiths or with no religion at all. In addition, evangelicals are much more numerous within the Republican Party than among Democrats.”

In 2016, 80% of Evangelicals voted in favor of the republican President Donald Trump.

Image result for photos of president trump with evangelicals

This background helps to explain why the remaining 16 members of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS were told they were being fired Wednesday (12/27/17), via a FedExed letter from the White House. Six members had already resigned in June 2017 in protest of what they called President Trump administration’s inaction on the issue. Why this was done is unclear, but it is alleged that the president’s administration preferred adherence to policies like abstinence-only sex ed.

Remember the recent edicts like banning Centers for Disease Control from using words like “diversity” and “transgender” in budget documents; the attempt to bar transgender soldiers from serving in the military; the rolling back of employers’ requirement to provide for birth-control coverage and the reversal of a policy that included LGBT employees under US anti-discrimination law; the declaration of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel by this presidential administration and other policies have all been pushed forward in deference to the republican Evangelical base of supporters.

Related image

Here’s the rest of the story…

On December 28, 2017, Chris Johnson of the Blade penned the following report, “Trump fires all members of HIV/AIDS council without explanation.”


“With no explanation, the White House has terminated members of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS amid widespread discontent with President Trump’s approach to the epidemic.”

Image result for photos of president trump with evangelicals

“After six members of PACHA resigned in June, the White House on Wednesday terminated the remaining 16 members without explanation via a letter from FedEx.”

“Scott Schoettes, a Chicago-based HIV/AIDS activist and senior attorney for Lambda Legal, was one of the six who resigned in June over Trump’s inaction on HIV/AIDS and said on Twitter the remaining members were fired.”

“No respect for their service,” Schoettes said. “Dangerous that #Trump and Co. (Pence esp.) are eliminating few remaining people willing to push back against harmful policies, like abstinence-only sex ed.”

Remaining /AIDS council members booted by @realDonaldTrump. No respect for their service. Dangerous that  and Co. (Pence esp.) are eliminating few remaining people willing to push back against harmful policies, like abstinence-only sex ed.   

“Sources with knowledge of PACHA said many council members were fired even though additional time remained on their terms as advisers. The terminated members, sources said, were given the option to reapply after Tuesday (1/2/17).”
Image result for photos of president trump with evangelicals

“Gabriel Maldonado, CEO of the Riverside, Calif.,-based LGBT and HIV/AIDS group Truevolution, was a remaining member of PACHA and confirmed they were fired, but said the “explanation is still unclear.”

“I can only speculate,” Maldonado said. “Like any administration, they want their own people there. Many of us were Obama appointees. I was an Obama appointee and my term was continuing until 2018.”

Maldonado said “ideological and philosophical differences” with the administration are a potential reason for the terminations.”

“As an example, Maldonado cited a recent Washington Post report the Centers for Disease Control is banned from using words like “diversity” and “transgender” in budge documents. The CDC director has denied those words are banned.”

Image result for photos of president trump with evangelicals

“I was co-chair of the disparities committee, so much of my advocacy and policy references surrounded vulnerable populations, addressing issuing of diverse communities, specifically looking at the impacts of the LGBT community, namely, the disproportionate impact of HIV and AIDS to people of color, gay men, transgender women,” Maldonado said. “And a lot of those key vulnerable populations are not being prioritized in this administration.”

“Maldonado added he intends to publish an open letter to the community about his termination on Friday.”

“Also among the terminated members was Patrick Sullivan, a professor of epidemiology at the Emory University Rollins School of Public Health.”

Image result for photos of president trump with evangelicals

“My reaction is that our focus should be on the policies that PACHA addresses,” Sullivan said. “These issues are critical to people’s health, and are critical to making new HIV infections rare. At PACHA’s last meeting in August, the Council urged the Administration to affirm the National HIV/AIDS Strategy through 2020. Doing this would be a great way for the administration to set the tone and lay out national roadmap of priorities for a new PACHA.”

“Created in 1995, PACHA has provided advice starting in the Clinton administration and into the George W. Bush and Obama administrations on policy and research to promote effective treatment and prevention for HIV — maintaining the goal of finding a cure.”

“In September 2017, Trump signed an executive order that renewed PACHA along with 31 other presidential bodies for an additional year.”

Image result for photos of president trump with evangelicals

“Trump’s termination of council members isn’t a first time an administration cleaned house on PACHA. The Obama administration eliminated all of George W. Bush’s appointees before making new appointments.”

“Kaye Hayes, executive director of PACHA, affirmed the council members were terminated on Wednesday, but said there’s more to the story.”

“They were also thanked for their leadership, dedication and commitment to the effort,” Hayes said. “Changing the makeup of federal advisory committee members is a common occurrence during Administration changes. The Obama administration dismissed the George W. Bush administration appointees to PACHA in order to bring in new voices. All PACHA members are eligible to apply to serve on the new council that will be convened in 2018.”


Jim Driscoll, a gay Nevada-based HIV/AIDS activist who supported Trump in 2016, said replacement of PACHA members “is standard practice” for a new administration.

“Now they need to find bonafide community people with appropriate expertise and the ability to adapt to the changed political circumstances,” Driscoll said. ”

“But Maldonado said the termination of PACHA members during the Trump administration is only partially consistent with the Obama years.”

“It is common for appointees to be terminated and for folks to kind of want their own people in,” Maldonado said. “I think where the discrepancy comes in is why a year later, No. 1? Two, many of us, our terms were over earlier this year and we were sworn back in, and three were stayed on nearly four months after an executive order was signed continuing the council.”

Image result for photos of president trump with evangelicals

“In June, six members of the PACHA resigned the posts in protest over what they called inaction from Trump on the global HIV/AIDS epidemic. An estimated 1.2 million people have HIV/AIDS in the United States and 37 million have the disease worldwide.”

“Chief among the reasons was the absence of leadership at the White House on HIV/AIDS. The White House has yet to appoint a director of the Office of National AIDS Policy, which was one of the reasons the six members of PACHA resigned in June.”

“Trump’s fiscal year 2018 budget proposal also sought massive cuts to HIV/AIDS programs, including $150 million on HIV/AIDS programs at the Centers of Disease Control and more than $1 billion in cuts from global programs like PEPFAR Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis & Malaria. The Republican-controlled Congress has thus far continued to fund these programs at previous levels.”

Image result for photos of president trump with evangelicals

“Maldonado noted the PACHA terminations are taking place at the year’s end after the June resignations, which he said is “a little too coincidental.”

“Maldonado said he represented a younger demographic on PACHA as the only member under the age of 30, which he said is where the majority of new HIV infections are occurring, and as a young, black gay man.”

“I just am coming to the acknowledgment that the traditional tactics of politicking and policy and strategy and negotiation, the kind of standard tools that we’re trying to use, that the status quo is no longer acceptable,” Maldonado said. “The tactics that we had are kind of obsolete, and now we need to craft new strategy to address the troubling and unsettling revelations, particularly around the silence and inaction that have taken place around HIV and AIDS.”

Since the resignations in June, Trump has made public statements on HIV/AIDS consisting of proclamations on National HIV Testing Day and World AIDS Day. Neither statement includes a explicit mention of LGBT people.”

The White House deferred comment to the Department of Health & Human Services, which provided the statement from the PACHA executive director.

The Blade reported in October gay Republicans familiar with HIV/AIDS issues and LGBT issues have been among those contacted by a Trump administration official for possible appointments to PACHA.


  1. Presumably he wishes to appear compassionate without upsetting his own base. So spread the benefits of research out to other countries so you won’t have to know who is benefiting AND it comes out of another budget.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Roger,

      You are witnessing the out sized influence that the 81% of those White Evangelicals who voted for Donald Trump to be the 45th US president , are having on the US body of politics.

      I just wrote on another blog, “The reason that I have been focusing on these same White Evangelicals with a critical eye is that their numbers comprise a significant segment of the republican party’s base to where they wield a disproportionate amount of power. In addition, they have a champion in Vice President Mike Pence who is happy to curry their favor.”

      So, when you see policies being enacted by this White House which appear to make no sense whatsoever to any sane outside observer, like trans-genders not being able to serve in the military; the USA withdrawing from the 2015 Paris Climate Change Accord; and then the president announcing to the world that the US agrees that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel without having an Israel and Palestine peace agreement in tow, the question to ask, is who would approve of these decisions. This includes this presidential move to reduce monies allocated to UN. More often than naught, the answer will rest with our fellow Evangelical brothers and sisters.

      He is strongly motivated to keep this base intact because without them, he is toast.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 1 person

      • The voting group would approximate 20%? Whereas they might seem to be a formidable voting bloc, how long before regional differences and other groups mobilising, cause them to be frozen out and left only in their own regions?

        Liked by 1 person

        • Dear Roger,

          As always, bulls-eye!

          The republican days are numbered and they are well aware of this. Right now 37% of the US population are of the republican party. This makes their 20 % a significant portion of the republican party base.. This is why the republican party has been working hard to figure how to bar voters who typically vote for the democratic ticket, from having access to the voting booth. But their cheating days will soon be ending.

          As of the recent November 2017 VA elections, the democrats had a 20 point lead among women and a 48 point lead among young peoples between the ages of 18-34. Then you add the vast majority of minority community members, the DEMS are set for revenge.

          Hugs, Gronda

          Liked by 1 person

        • The failure of one group to reconcile itself to diversity has often been its downfall. They seem to forget a basic of democracy is to try and convince part your opposition to cross over, which does require some modifying of views.
          The majority within the Catholic Church accepted this over abortion, basically along the lines of :
          “OK we’re not happy with it, but sometimes it has to happen for health reasons. For those girls and women caught in unplanned pregnancies we offer adoption, counselling, and prayers of our community”
          A bit over-simplistic in my explanation and the support is very fragmented and often left to sort out down at local levels, but no condemnation, no accusations of murder on an individual level- the woman is seen as a victim . Although there are campaigning organisations against abortion and some go a bit ‘in your face’, but more to the legislators.
          As I said, messy, but not as inflexible and hate-powered as Evangelicals can be.

          Liked by 1 person

        • Dear Roger,

          The Catholic voters in the USA are a diverse group of folks. There are the the hard-line conservatives, the flaming liberals and even an Evangelical segment but not to be confused with the 81% who voted for Donald Trump.

          As per a February 2016 Pew Research survey, “Catholics are divided politically in our survey, just as they were in the 2012 election. While 37% say they favor the GOP, 44% identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party (and 19% say they do not lean either way). In the 2012 election, 50% of Catholics said they voted for Obama, while 48% voted for Romney.

          In short, they do not suffer from the cult-like culture when compared with the 81% of White Evangelicals who voted for President Trump.

          Thanks a million for being a part of my blogging family. May you and yours have a wonderful Happy New Year in 2018.

          Hugs, Gronda

          Liked by 1 person

        • Yes Catholics, despite what some would have you believe, these days are a diverse and at times quarrelsome bunch, who can be the bane of the senior folk in the Church. There is a tendency to think ‘Fine. But I only answer to The Holy Trinity,’
          And thanks to you for all your hard work in keeping people informed. I may not be visiting much over the next week as I am tied up in a revision of a fantasy novel I self-published last year, so apologies there.
          Anyway, all the best to you for 2018.

          Liked by 1 person

  2. Gronda, this is one case where Trump is acting exactly like Reagan, which was one of the largest criticisms ever placed on Reagan outside of the Iran-Contra affair. I just rewatched the excellent movie “And the Band Played on” starring Matthew Modine and Alan Alda among a terrific cast about the slowness to fund the fight against what was relabeled as AIDs. If the epidemic had not hit hemophiliacs getting tramsfusions, Reagan may never had cared. 25,000 gay men had died before Reagan ever mentioned AIDs. Like Trump, Reagan cares primarily about white heretosexuals. One of the more disgusting parts of the film is seeing Jerry Falwell opine on the epidemic.

    This Trump moves shows that he cares primarily about his voter base. The rest of us are just “votes that don’t count.” Keith

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Keith,

      You and I both have a full understanding that this action by the president towards the UN has more to do with him catering to that 81% of White Evangelicals who voted for him than anything of a substantive nature.

      This action is definitely not consistent with being pro-life. As a Christian who values highly this gift of faith that I have been blessed with, I resent these folks using the name of God to promote actions that I truly consider to be anti- Christian while they give the Christian life a bad name.

      Hugs, Gronda


Comments are closed.