It appears that the US Department of Justice’s officials have been becoming more aggressive in divulging enough information in order to educate the public as to its competency in its performance and to counter those critics who have been unfairly shaking the faith of the American peoples who need to rely in the integrity of their services and work products.
Pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit (FOIA), the US Department of Justice (DOJ) took the unprecedented step to release a redacted copy of the FISA application seeking a warrant against the president’s former foreign policy advisor, Carter Page.
The publication of the FISA applicant and warrant was done to put the lie to all the right wing conspiracy purveyors, to prove once and for all time, that their assertions that the warrant had been ordered under fraudulent circumstances, had no basis in fact. Those disseminating these lies were counting on being able to claim just about anything because they believed, incorrectly, that the FISA warrant in question could never be made public.
The publication makes the likes of the US House republican chairman of its Intelligence Committee Rep. Devin Nunes look like an absolute fool. He and others had been accusing the FISA Court and Justice Department of enabling the surveillance of the Mr. Page for political rather than national security reasons.
[Read the documents here.]
Here’s the rest of the story…
On July 21, 2018, Charlie Savage of the New York Times penned the following report, “Carter Page FISA Documents Are Released by Justice Department”
“The Trump administration disclosed on Saturday (7/22/18) a previously top-secret set of documents related to the wiretapping of Carter Page, the onetime Trump campaign adviser who was at the center of highly contentious accusations by Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee that the F.B.I. had abused its surveillance powers.”
“Democrats in February rejected the Republican claims that law enforcement officials had improperly obtained a warrant to monitor Mr. Page, accusing them of putting out misinformation to defend President Trump and sow doubts about the origin of the Russia investigation. But even as Republicans and Democrats issued dueling memos characterizing the materials underlying the surveillance of Mr. Page, the public had no access to the records.”
“On Saturday evening, those materials — an October 2016 application to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to wiretap Mr. Page, along with several renewal applications — were released to The New York Times and other news organizations that had filed Freedom of Information Act lawsuits to obtain them. Mr. Trump had declassified their existence earlier this year.”
“This application targets Carter Page,” the document said. “The F.B.I. believes Page has been the subject of targeted recruitment by the Russian government.” A line was then redacted, and then it picked up with “undermine and influence the outcome of the 2016 U.S. presidential election in violation of U.S. criminal law. Mr. Page is a former foreign policy adviser to a candidate for U.S. president.”
“Mr. Page has denied being a Russian agent and has not been charged with a crime in the nearly two years since the initial wiretap application was filed. He did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Saturday.”
“The spectacle of the release was itself noteworthy, given that wiretapping under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, is normally one of the government’s closest-guarded secrets. No such application materials had apparently become public in the 40 years since Congress enacted that law to regulate the interception of phone calls and other communications on domestic soil in search of spies and terrorists, as opposed to wiretapping for ordinary criminal investigations.”
“The documents made public on Saturday were heavily redacted in places, and some of the substance of the applications had already become public in February, via the Republican and Democratic Intelligence Committee memos.”
“Visible portions showed that the F.B.I. in stark terms had told the intelligence court that Mr. Page “has established relationships with Russian government officials, including Russian intelligence officers”; that the bureau believed “the Russian government’s efforts are being coordinated with Page and perhaps other individuals associated with” Mr. Trump’s campaign; and that Mr. Page “has been collaborating and conspiring with the Russian government.”
“The fight over the surveillance of Mr. Page centered on the fact that the F.B.I., in making the case to judges that he might be a Russian agent, had used some claims drawn from a notorious Democratic-funded dossier compiled by Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence agent.”