Pentagon Says No To President Trump By Limiting What US Military Can Do At Border


When the republican President Donald Trump recently stated publicly that if anyone traveling with the Honduran caravan that is currently in Mexico, heading towards the US-Mexican border throws rocks at the military personnel that he is ordering to the border, they had his permission to fire back.

The Associated Press has said that the caravan is currently in or around the city of Santiago Niltepec, which is located in the state of Oaxaca, and about 250 miles from the city of Oaxaca itself.

Image result for images of map of mexico

The Pentagon’s analysis of this refugee caravan counters  what the republican President Donald Trump and his sycophants have been saying. They have portrayed the Honduran refugee caravan as being financed by their favorite bogeyman, the Jewish billionaire George Soros who has a history of donating monies to democratic causes; that there are criminals and middle eastern terrorists traveling with the caravan; and that the refugees/ INVADERS are carrying diseases like leprosy, small pox and TB.

To bolster the seriousness of this made-up crisis, the president has declared that he is ordering 15,000 additional active military on top of the over 5,000 that was his original demand. He wants this to be a fait acomplis before the US midterm November 6, 2018 even though, those remaining in this caravan will not reach the US border until the first week in December 2018. In short, the president is ordering active military troops to the US border for show, to impress the anti-immigration faction of his base.

He had to walk back these words, as the Pentagon nixed these plans. The Pentagon will be deploying some active military to the US Southern border, but not in the numbers that the president and his (DHS) Department if Homeland Security have been requesting and they are there to provide support for the border agents which includes logistical and air support.

Related image

Here is the rest of the story…

On November 3, 2018, Zeeshan Aleem of VOX penned the following report, “The Pentagon reportedly rejected Trump’s request to give troops extra power at the border” (“The president’s troop mobilization is a lot tamer than he would have wanted.”)


In the run-up to deploying over over 5,000 troops to the US-Mexico border, the Trump administration went to the Pentagon and asked whether or not those soldiers could basically serve as law enforcement along the border.

The Pentagon wasn’t having it.

Image result for photos of us active military at us southern border

“CNN’s Ryan Browne and Nicole Gaouette reported Friday that military leaders rebuffed the Department of Homeland Security’s request that the troops “provide ‘crowd and traffic control’ and safeguard Customs and Border Protection personnel” — roles that would have given soldiers more expansive authority than they currently have under US law.”

“Instead the Pentagon signed off on a narrower set of authorities: Troops will provide Border Patrol agents with logistical and air support, as DHS prepares for a caravan of migrants from Central America that is approaching the US. The idea is that they’ll be doing things like helping transport agents and erecting razor wire on border fences.”

Related image

“But as the CNN report underscores, Trump would have had the military play a much more dramatic role, if he could have. In a bid to boost Republican turnout at the midterm elections, Trump has been stoking xenophobic fears about the caravan by implying that it’s brimming with Middle Eastern terrorists. He’s suggested he could end up sending up to 15,000 troops to deal with the threat.

“(The president had) said that the troops should shoot migrants if they throw rocks. The language conjures up the image of direct confrontations between migrants and US troops. But in reality, the troops are there to assist civil authorities, and they’re not expected to come into direct contact with migrants.”

Image result for photos of us active military at us southern border

What the military can and can’t do

The military’s role at the border is to boost the capacity of Border Patrol agents to do their job. Gen. Terrence J. O’Shaughnessy, the head of US Northern Command, told reporters on Monday (10/29/18) that the military will send:

  • Three helicopter companies, with night-vision capabilities, to help Border Patrol officers to reach remote locations quickly
  • Four airplanes to transport Border Patrol agents as needed
  • Deployable medical units to care for anyone that may needed attention
  • 22 miles of concertina wire to reinforce fencing along the border

“While the troops will be armed and will provide some security, it’s only to support Border Patrol agents in case they need it — military personnel won’t be independently patrolling the border and arresting migrants.”

Image result for photos of us active military at us southern border

“And why not? Why can’t US troops arrest immigrants who may be coming across the border illegally? Well, as Vox’s Alex Ward explained, “it’s against the law.”

“The US military is barred from using its capabilities directly to enforce US domestic laws — including immigration laws — unless Congress specifically authorizes it to do so. This measure, known as “posse comitatus,” is why US troops can only support US border agents, but not take direct action themselves.”

“O’Shaughnessy on Monday said the military will conduct all of its operations at the border “in adherence to posse comitatus.”

“The contrast between Trump’s talk tough of troops at the border versus the reality of what they can actually do at the border is simply a reminder that the whole mobilization is a political stunt designed to capitalize on nativist anxieties.”


  1. And the reality is that no troops even need to be sent to begin with. And the other reality is that this little game that Trump is playing in order to make himself look “tough” to his base is going to cost U.S. taxpayers somewhere in the neighborhood of $200 million!!! All for naught. All because Trump tells his base that there are monsters under the bed, and they are foolish enough to believe him. Sigh. Imagine how many families could eat for a year, how many sick children could receive medicine with that wasted money. There is no conscience in the Trump administration and perhaps not in his base either.


    Liked by 3 people

    • Dear Jill,

      The deployment of active military troops for a political stunt is an outrage. In my opinion, I’m upset that General Mattis as the Defense secretary gave into the president’s demands. I’m certain that he is getting an earful from other generals and he should.

      General Mattis has just had his reputation compromised. Yes, He may get fired, but he lets the president fire him rather than compromise his principles regarding the usage of troops for political purposes only.

      Anyone who serves in the military will be rightfully outraged by this deployment so the president can play his ‘fear immigrants’ fear mongering type games.

      There had better be no blood shed at the border because of this deployment.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 2 people

      • It IS an outrage, an unconscionable act by one who is acting as a dictator rather than the president of a democratic republic.

        I, too, was surprised that Mattis caved, given that from all indications he will soon be leaving anyway. I thought he had more backbone. Sigh. Is there anybody in this administration that will stand up against Trump? This only highlights why Tuesday’s elections are so important!

        I fear that there will be blood shed at the border and also more children taken from their parents.

        Hugs, my friend.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Dear Suzanne,

      The Pentagon’s own assessment differs significantly from what President Trump has been touting. The Defense Secretary General Mattis should have said no to ant active military being sent to the border.

      Thanks a million for all of your support and for this reblog.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 2 people

    • Dear Mary Plumbago,

      Thanks for sharing this information. Talk about a formula for disaster. Armed vigilantes helping at the border is nuts but I bet that they are all supporters of President Trump.

      Hugs, Gronda


Comments are closed.