Maine’s GOP Senator Collins Was Had By Justice Kavanaugh As Per His Latest Abortion Law Ruling

abortion debate.jpg
Top photo: AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite | Bottom photo: AP Photo/Susan Walsh

In 2018, the Louisiana State’s legislative body had passed a highly restrictive abortion law that was of course being challenged in the lower courts where latest federal court ruling favored of the implementation of this law.

As per the 1/25/19 Advocate report by Caroline Grueskin, “The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld the statute, overturning a lower court decision. First, a panel of judges voted 2-1 in its favor, and then last week, the full court decided against rehearing the case.”

Image result for photos of Circuit Judge Jerry Smith


“Attorneys with the Center for Reproductive Rights, an advocacy group that represents the Shreveport-based Hope Medical Group, had filed a motion with the appellate court Friday asking it to stay the ruling, pending a review by the U.S. Supreme Court. ”

“Circuit Judge Jerry Smith denied the request Friday afternoon, but the motion that was filed on the clinic’s behalf triggered a seven-day delay in enforcement under court rules. Late Friday, the Center for Reproductive Rights said it had filed an emergency petition with the U.S. Supreme Court asking it to intervene.”

Image result for photos of Circuit Judge Jerry Smith
Circuit Judge Jerry Smith (CENTER)

The lower court’s decision ended up for review before the US Supreme Court and on the 7th of February, a 5-4 ruling was issued in favor of staying/ stopping the more restrictive Louisiana abortion legislation from taking effect. The Chief Justice John Roberts joined in with the majority.

As per a Planned Parenthood website, “A restrictive abortion law was passed and if this law takes effect, it will pose a serious risk to women across Louisiana. Reports indicate this law could cause some of Louisiana’s five remaining health centers providing safe and legal abortion to close their doors, which could end access south of Shreveport. A woman would have to drive up to 300 miles one way to obtain safe, legal abortion care.”

Remember how the GOP Senator Susan Collins from Maine backed the confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to become a US Supreme Court justice, as she claimed to believe his  promise to her, that he would be respectful of ‘stare decisis.’ This was supposed to mean that he would look to past, similar issues or precedent to guide his decisions regarding upholding the rights of women to have access to legal abortions. Because abortion rights have been affirmed on numerous occasions in the past, Judge Kavanaugh’s commitment to this principle was a confirmation that he’d not be ruling against abortion rights, per se. Guess who was the only justice to write a dissenting opinion regarding this Supreme Court’s ruling? He not only voted against the stay, he wrote the dissenting opinion.


Here is the rest of the story…

On February 7, 2019, Adam Liptak of the New York Times penned the following report, Supreme Court Blocks Louisiana Abortion Law”


“The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked a Louisiana law that its opponents say could have left the state with only one doctor in a single clinic authorized to provide abortions.”

“The vote was 5 to 4, with Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. joining the court’s four-member liberal wing to form a majority. That coalition underscored the pivotal position the chief justice has assumed after the departure last year of Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who used to hold the crucial vote in many closely divided cases, including ones concerning abortion.”

Image result for images of the us supreme court justices

“The court’s brief order gave no reasons, and its action — a temporary stay — did not end the case. The court is likely to hear a challenge to the law on the merits in its next term, which starts in October.”

“Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito Jr., Neil M. Gorsuch and Brett M. Kavanaugh said they would have denied the stay. Only Justice Kavanaugh published a dissent, taking a middle position that acknowledged the key precedent and said he would have preferred more information on the precise effect of the law.”

Related image

“For Chief Justice Roberts, it was something of a turnaround, at least for now. He dissented in the court’s last major abortion case in 2016, voting to uphold a Texas law essentially identical to the one at issue in Thursday’s case (2/7/19).”

“Abortion rights advocates welcomed the court’s order, which came around 9:30 p.m., only hours before the law was to go into effect.”

Image result for images of the us supreme court justices WITH KAVANAUGH

“The Supreme Court has stepped in under the wire to protect the rights of Louisiana women,” Nancy Northup, the president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement. “The three clinics left in Louisiana can stay open while we ask the Supreme Court to hear our case. This should be an easy case — all that’s needed is a straightforward application of the court’s own precedent.”

“Chief Justice Roberts’s overall voting record has been conservative, and this was not the first time in recent months he has disappointed some of his usual allies. In December, he joined the court’s four-member liberal wing — Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan — to reject a request from the Trump administration in a case that could upend decades of asylum policy.”

Link to entire New York Times report: Supreme Court Blocks Louisiana Abortion Law


  1. I was pleased and a bit surprised by Justice Roberts’ decision, and disgusted by Kavanaugh’s written dissent. I wonder, if there were to be a law in some state that made it almost impossible for men to seek such medications as Viagra, or to obtain a vasectomy, how quick Mr. Kavanaugh and Gorsuch would be to uphold that law? They play God with women’s health, for to them, we are naught but second-class citizens, not capable of making decisions about our own bodies. Anyway, hats off to Justice Roberts.

    Liked by 4 people

    • It appears as though the reports that Justice Roberts appears to be extremely concerned about the politicization of the Court are true, and his unexpected backing of the more liberal-leaning justices in several cases are the direct result of that uneasiness.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Dear Jill,

      I still want SCOTUS nomination process regarding Judge Kavanaugh fully investigated. Chief Justice is doing the right thing by protecting the Supreme Court from being viewed as any more partisan than it already is.

      But now we also know that either Judge Kavanaugh or Sen. Collins or both are smooth talking liars. I don’t want either of them to get away with their sleight of hand.

      It would be great if some of the female legislators came up with a law where insurance companies would not pay for optional medication like Viagra, just to make a point.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 1 person

      • I agree 100%! The whole Kavanaugh confirmation process was a sham and should definitely be the subject of investigation. Meanwhile, though, I am happy to see Chief Justice Roberts doing the right thing … let’s hope he keeps doing so and that this wasn’t just a one-off for show.

        Yes, it is galling that companies don’t want their employee healthcare to cover birth control, yet they will pay willingly for Viagra … double standard?


        Liked by 1 person

  2. Gronda, I think the Chief Justice recognizes fully rhe gravity of his situation. More so than before, he must be even-tempered and avoid being partisan at all costs. He will make votes for beon’t like, but I do hold his judgment in high regard. Keith

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Keith,

      I suspect the same as you do. The SCOTUS Chief Justice Roberts is going out of his way to keep his court from appearing overly partisan. He’s trying to maintain the dignity and reputation of the US supreme Court in good stead.

      Hugs, Gronda


    • Dear Joanne the geek,

      This was a surprise decision to many conservatives who were believing they had the US Supreme Court in their pockets. But I suspect that Justice Roberts doesn’t want to give credence to this expectation

      Hugs, Gronda


Comments are closed.