aside A Mother’s Cry Ignored As Her Mentally ILL Child Was Sold A Gun

Image result for photo of president trump signing gun executive orderIt is an unpleasant  task to keep up with our republican President Donald Trump’s implementation of his executive orders, especially when these actions do real harm to the very peoples, he promised to help.

President Trump, who championed the National Rifle Association agenda as a candidate, signed a regressive measure to strike down a sensible Obama administration rule designed to stop people with severe mental health problems from buying guns .(This was quickly drawn up by the republicans in the US Congress)

This is an instance where republicans plus about six democrats placed the well being of the American peoples behind the lobbying power and monies of the National Rifle Association (NRA).

Why did the NRA push for this? The answer is that it wanted to immunize gun dealers from being successfully sued if the business knowingly sells guns to mentally ill adults.

Image result for photo of janet delana in mo
Mrs. Delana/ Photo by Christopher Smith

Here is the story that explains the NRA’s motivation…

On 3/6/17 Ann E. Marimow of the Washington Post penned the following narrative, “A warning, a gun sale and tragic consequences.

Excerpts:

In Wellington, Mo.

She called the police. Then ATF. After that, the FBI.

“Janet Delana was desperate to stop her mentally ill adult daughter from buying another handgun.”

“Finally, Delana called the gun shop a few miles from her home, the one that had sold her daughter a black Hi-Point pistol a month earlier when her last disability check had arrived.”

“The next check was coming.”

“Delana pleaded.”

“Her daughter had been in and out of mental hospitals, she told the store manager, and was diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic. She had tried to kill herself. Her father had taken away the other gun, but Delana worried that her daughter would go back.”

“I’m begging you,” Delana said through tears. “I’m begging you as a mother, if she comes in, please don’t sell her a gun.”

Image result for photo of janet delana in mo
Odessa Gun & Pawn in Odessa, Mo.

Inside the store

“Something like what I bought last time,” Colby Sue Weathers said to the manager, Derrick Dady.”

“She seemed nervous, he would recall to police.”

“Weathers had a diagnosis of mental illness, but she had never been identified as a threat to herself or others by a judge or ordered to an extended mental hospital stay — which meant she could pass the background check for her gun.he Hi-Point pistol and one box of ammunition cost Weathers $257.85 at the Odessa Gun & Pawn shop on the main drag of the small Missouri town about 40 miles east of Kansas City.”Image result for photo of janet delana in mo

“Weathers headed back to the house the 38-year-old shared with her parents, stopping for a pack of unfiltered cigarettes along the way at a gas station. A firefighter who was an old acquaintance saw her acting skittishly and muttering.”

“An hour after leaving the gun store, Weathers was back home where her father sat at a computer with his back to her.”

“She shot.”

“Weathers planned to kill herself next but told a 911 operator: “I can’t shoot myself. I was going to after I did it, but I couldn’t bring myself to it.”

Delana lost Tex, her husband of nearly 40 years, and her daughter, who was charged with murder. And beneath her anguish, Delana seethed.”Image result for photo of janet delana in mo

“The store had made about $60 profit on the sale, court records would show.”

“After everything I did, they still sold her a gun,” Delana said recently. “The more I thought about it, the madder I got. I wanted someone to pay.”

“Delana sued the Odessa Gun & Pawn shop for negligence in the June 2012 sale and won a decision at the Missouri Supreme Court that said that nothing in federal law barred Delana’s type of lawsuit. Under state law, the court ruled that dealers can be held liable if they should have known a buyer was dangerous. Last fall, with a trial set to start in January in the wrongful death case, the gun shop settled with Delana, saying it had followed the law and done nothing wrong.”

Image result for photo of janet delana in mo“I can’t just go by what a phone call says,” Dady said during a deposition. “If the person that comes in . . . passes the background check, I can sell them a gun.”

“The gun shop agreed to pay Delana $2.2 million.”

“Gun-control advocates say the state court’s decision, combined with Delana’s settlement, are significant victories for those who want to reduce gun violence by changing the financial equation for the firearms industry.”

Alla Lefkowitz and Jonathan E. Lowy, attorneys with the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, argued Delana’s case.

“The Missouri case, brought with the help of lawyers from the D.C.-based Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, provides a legal road map for similar lawsuits around the country, according to the Brady Center, which said there are at least 10 other civil cases pending, including in Florida, Pennsylvania, Indiana and Texas.”

“Jonathan E. Lowy, Brady’s legal director who argued Delana’s case, said it sends a “powerful message to the gun industry nationwide, and to the companies that insure them, that if you supply a dangerous person with a gun, you will pay the price.”

“Gun rights supporters counter that a 2005 national law that shields gunmakers, distributors and sellers from lawsuits never provided blanket immunity and already has exceptions to cover knowingly illegal sales.”

“Lawrence G. Keane, general counsel for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, said the lawsuits brought by the Brady Center and others are an effort to impose gun control through litigation instead of legislation.”

Related imageGrowing up with guns

“Far from Washington, where vast fields of corn and soybeans surround a community of 800 on the bluffs of the Missouri River, the gun debate is personal.”

“Delana grew up around guns. Her father was an avid hunter. Her husband, the high school sweetheart she married when she was 17, cleaned guns on the porch.”

“A Browning pistol her husband bought still rests in the gun safe next to Delana’s bed, as much for sentiment as protection.”

“Delana doesn’t want to take guns away from everybody — just from people like her daughter who are struggling with mental illness. After a career in state government helping other people navigate Missouri’s social-services system, she is frustrated she couldn’t do more to stop her daughter from getting a gun.”

“She said she is determined to bring attention to gaps in the background check system and to expand the number of mentally ill people barred from buying firearms.”

“Even if her daughter previously had been deemed a threat by a judge, Delana has learned, there was no guarantee a background check would have caught that exclusion. The federal background check system that is used to prevent convicted felons from buying guns is missing scores of state health records that would also flag and disqualify those who are seriously mentally ill.”

Image result for photo of janet delana in mo“But, Delana also has learned, if the Obama regulations had been in place when Weathers bought her weapon, they would not have barred her purchase because she received and managed her own Social Security disability checks.”

“Dismantling those regulations now, her mother said, is a mistake.”

On gun regulations: (Source: Washington Post)

• The House and Senate voted largely along party lines in February (2017) to get rid of Obama administration regulations aimed at blocking mentally ill people from passing federal background checks for gun purchases. President Trump signed the measure, HJ Res 40, rescinding the rules on Feb. 28.

• The rules had required the Social Security Administration to share information with the FBI about those receiving federal disability payments because of a mental illness — and unable to manage their finances — to ensure that their names were flagged in firearms dealers’ routine background checks.

• The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act provides unique legal protections for firearms manufacturers, distributors and retailers. Passed by Congress in 2005, the law bars most civil lawsuits seeking to hold the industry accountable after the products it sells are misused, including in mass shootings.

• Supporters of the law say it has prevented frivolous lawsuits and includes exceptions for knowingly illegal sales. Opponents say those exceptions are narrow. Efforts to change or repeal the law, including last year, have not gained traction in a Republican-controlled Congress.

10 comments

    • Dear CarolMaeWY,

      It is definitely a heart breaking story. And it is infuriating. I am praying that those who are part of the resistance do not grow weary with all of DT’s heartless actions but it is time to kick butt and get those smug, republicans or anyone else who supports these kind of laws out of office.

      Ciao, Gronda.

  1. I don’t understand how the NRA has so much power to stop common sense moves to protect people from guns, even in a small way like this. I think the founding fathers would be horrified at what legislation allows using the second amendment in their name.
    xxx Huge Hugs xxx

    • Dear DavidProsser,

      The National Rifle Association (NRA) has a lot of power to do this because they donate lots of monies to republican party members of the US Congress. If republican members do not vote in favor of legislation sponsored and approved by the National Rifle Association (NRA), at their next election, the NRA will fund a competitor to run against them.

      So, the ugly truth is that we have cowardly representatives in US congress who are willing to sell their souls to keep their jobs.

      The consequence of this, is that we in the USA are much more likely to be harmed by a mentally ill misfit,with a gun than the so called terrorists (refugees) that our president claims to be protecting us from with his travel (Muslim) ban from six Muslim majority countries where he does not conduct business.

      These are dark times for the USA.

      Ciao, Gronda.

      • On the other hand just how many Republicans will be left to vote in favour of NRA sponsored legislation after next year’s elections. Maybe the Democrats will have a real chance at putting some safety measures in place and save a few lives.
        xxx Hugs Galore xxx

        • Dear DavidProsser,

          Barring a miracle, we probably are going to have to wait until the next regular election season in 2018. Hopefully, we will have our chance then.

          Ciao, Gronda

Comment

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s