aside Most Americans Believe That Climate Change Is For Real

Image result for photos of science marchesToday on Earth Day, April 22, 2017, peoples around the world will be participating in protests to stand up for science. I will be one of them marching from 10:00 am- 2:00 pm at Poytner Park in St. Petersburg, FL. with a homemade sign advertising that “I love Science.”

As per a recent Gallop Poll, “Just this month (March 2017), nearly three-quarters of Americans (71%) said they favored protecting the environment over a focus on increased production of coal, oil and natural gas.”

Image result for photos of science marchesThus, it is a puzzle for lots of us, as to why a significant portion of republicans resist scientific studies which indicate that climate change is for real. Despite consensus among 97% of scientists who agree on this point, we have a republican President Donald Trump who still claims that climate change is a Chinese hoax.

It is my opinion that big monies from the fossil fuel industry and the Koch brothers are behind encouraging many republicans to choose to discount the reality of science when it comes to the issue of climate change. This is akin to the republicans support of “fake news” which is bad enough but our president is basing U.S. policies on this “fake news.”

Remember that organization called the Heartland Institute which sponsored studies, proving that second hand smoke was not harmful to those exposed to it. Well this organization supported by the Koch brothers is still around and of course, they fund scientific studies discounting the science of climate change. (See the link below for a 2012 report on the Heartland Institute.)

rick perry
Rick Perry/ Michael B. Thomas/Getty Images

It wouldn’t be so bad if republications eliminated regulations limiting the development of renewable energy sources. Let marketplace competition take over. The former republican Texas Governor and current US Secretary of Energy Rick Perry is not a fan of the science supporting the reality of climate change, but in Texas he pushed hard for increasing the usage of renewable energy resources because this was good for his state.

Here is the rest of the story…

As per a recent Gallup Poll reported on 4/3/17 by Andrew Dugan and Frank Newport, most Americans believe that climate change is for real.

Public Opinion Context for Trump's Environmental Actions
 Here are excerpts from the Gallup Report, “Public Opinion Context for Trump’s Environmental Actions.”

“On (4/18/17), President Donald Trump signed a “sweeping” executive order that will rollback a number of Obama-era environmental regulations. The president’s stated reasons for taking these actions include the following: make the U.S. “energy independent,” cheapen the price of different forms of energy (or at least stop the price from rising) and keep states from shutting down energy production sites, like coal mines, which otherwise might have closed because of existing emissions standards.”

“Gallup recently conducted its annual Environment Gallup Poll Social Series (GPSS) survey. Generally speaking, when compared with recent years, a larger portion of the public is sympathetic to protecting the environment and limiting human pollution, and less worried about energy production or cost.”

Image result for photos of science marches“To some extent, this may be an anticipatory reaction to the new Trump Administration, given Trump’s campaign promises and statements about energy and the environment. To that point, fewer than half of Americans said Trump was doing a good job protecting the nation’s environment (36%) or improving the nation’s energy policy (46%) even before Trump issued his executive order affecting energy and the environment.”

“Results show that the majority of Americans do not believe two of the main aims of Trump’s environmental policy — increasing production of energy in the U.S. and keeping it cheap — should be prioritized over environmental protection. In particular, 59% of Americans agreed that protection of the environment should be given priority, even at the risk of limiting the amount of energy supplies, up from 41% in 2011. And 56% of Americans said that protection of the environment should be prioritized over economic growth.”

Related image
4/22/17 Science Marches

“Both of those questions were asked before Trump signed the executive order, and perhaps Americans have since been persuaded by his arguments. But, as responses to many questions on Gallup’s Environment GPSS survey make clear, near-record lows of Americans are worried about the cost or availability of energy supplies — making it tough for Trump to win support for his energy-focused executive actions among these Americans.”

“More specifically, the percentage of Americans who say they worry “a great deal” about the availability and affordability of energy in the U.S. fell to the lowest level on record in 2017, at 27%. The relatively low price of gasoline may be a major factor in shaping Americans’ opinions on this matter.”

Related image“And it isn’t just gasoline that has become cheaper in recent years: the price of residential natural gas dropped significantly between 2008 and 2016. In general, Trump is announcing this major push for energy independence and increased levels of domestic production of energy sources at a time when energy production in the U.S. has been increasing substantially.”

“One notable energy source has not benefitted from this rising tide: coal. The industry has struggled in recent years, with production down substantially over the past two years. But the decline in the availability of coal has not been associated with an increase in Americans’ concerns about energy; in fact, just the opposite has occurred.”

Image result for photos of science marches“Additionally, in 2015, Gallup found that 28% of Americans wanted to put more emphasis on coal in order to produce more energy, at the bottom of the list of the six energy sources measured in the survey question.”

Majority of Americans Want More Emphasis on Solar, Wind and Natural Gas
Do you think that as a country, the United States should put more emphasis, less emphasis or about the same emphasis as it does now on producing domestic energy from each of the following sources – – [RANDOM ORDER]?
More emphasis Less emphasis Same emphasis
% % %
Solar power 79 9 12
Wind 70 14 14
Natural gas 55 12 32
Oil 41 30 27
Nuclear power 35 33 28
Coal 28 43 27
MAR 5-8, 2015

“Just this month, nearly three-quarters of Americans (71%) said they favored protecting the environment over a focus on increased production of coal, oil and natural gas.”

Image result for photos of science marches“Even Republicans are not wholly convinced the U.S. should prioritize producing energy over environmental protections. More than one-third of Republicans and Republican-leaners think environmental protection, not energy production, should be the key concern. This is up from as low as 22% in 2011 among the same group. Republicans are less likely than Democrats to say they worry at a very serious level about the availability of energy in the U.S. — 22% vs. 30%. And less than one-fifth of Republicans say the energy situation in the U.S. is “very serious” (19%) while 26% of Democrats say this.”

“A common charge leveled at the new president is that he has not sought to broaden his support beyond the core group of Americans who helped put him in office. Trump’s failure to do so may be one reason why he holds a historically low approval rating for a president at the beginning of his tenure. Unless Trump is able to convince more Americans that energy production is so important it warrants prioritizing it over environmental protection issues, it seems this executive order could be an instance of Trump implementing or pursuing a policy that is out of sync with broad trends in American public opinion.”

Related Articles:

Leak exposes how Heartland Institute works to undermine climate ... › Environment › Climate change scepticism Feb 14, 2012 –

Secret funding helped build vast network of climate denial thinktanks ... › Environment › Climate change scepticism  Feb 14, 2013 –


  1. Gronda, thanks for sharing this. I do love the chart toward the end. Even Exxon-Mobil is telling DT not to pull out of the Paris deal. This drum needs to be beaten louder. Keith

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Keith,

      This is a testimony as to how special interests trumps what is in the peoples; best interests when it comes to policy making and legislating by our elected officials. . The fossil fuel industry is having its way.

      Ciao, Gronda


      • Gronda, you may have noticed the uptick in fossil fuel commercials saying how environmentally conscious they are while glossing over the unsafe nature of what they do most. Also, at the same time Exxon-Mobil is telling DT not to back out of the Paris deal, eleven state attorney generals are trying to get the case against Exxon-Mobil by the New York and Massachusets AG for misleading investors on climate change thrown out. If found guilty, this is securities fraud. Keith

        Liked by 1 person

        • Dear Keith,

          I am supportive of this case going forward to expose the underbelly of special interests influencing the legislation and policy making by our lawmakers. In this case, climate change is too crucial to let the fossil fuel industry get away with this.

          Ciao, Gronda


        • Gronda, I agree. The key to the case is in Exxon-Mobil’s own files where their scientists used to educate people about climate change and our role in causing it dating back to the late 1970s. Then, in the late 1990s, the CEO embraced the climate change is a hoax theme and hired the tobacco industry PR people to lie for them. This is the heart of the lawsuit as they also lied to shareholders, which is a crime, if confirmed. Keith

          Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.