aside Congress Finalizing Bill Barring President Trump From Arbitrarily Lifting Russian Sanctions

Finally, it looks like the US Congress is in the process of finalizing the Senate’s bill mid-June 2017 Senate’s bill, which bars the republican President Donald Trump from arbitrarily lifting US sanctions imposed on Russia starting in 2012 with the Magnitsky Act, due to severe human rights violations; in 2014 for Russia’s unprovoked invasion and annexation of Crimea, Ukraine; and in 2016, as a consequence to Russia having meddled into the 2016 US presidential elections systems.

The US Congress plans to have this bill on the president ‘s desk for his signature by the end on July 2017. Russia is already promising retaliation. With the 2012 Magnitsky Act, President Vladimir Putin put an end to Americans adopting Russian children, even for the adoptions that were in process. At the time of the 2016 sanctions, it is speculated that General Flynn of the president elect’s team contacted the US Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak gave assurances that once President Trump was in the White House, that relations between the two countries would take a turn for the better and thus it was not necessary for Russia to retaliate.

Related image

Obviously, this congressional bill is not what Russian officials were expecting and so the gloves are off.

It became obvious that the US Congress had to act because in July 2017, Russia was pressuring the White House to return two US compounds that that were confiscated as part of the 2016 sanctions imposed on it by President Barack Obama before he left office; and there were news reports indicating that the US was close to finalizing a deal with Russia.

The president seems to have an affinity for all things Russia including its President Vladimir Putin, to where his judgement is suspect. So, the US House of Representatives has finally taken the appropriate steps to bar him from not acting in the US best interests.

Image result for photos of congress working on russian sanctions bill

On July 22, 2017, Jeremy Herb and Deidre Walsh of CNN penned the following breaking news report,” Congress reaches Russia sanctions deal.”


The House and Senate reached a deal Saturday to slap Russia with fresh sanctions and give Congress new veto power to block any easing of those sanctions — an agreement that could send a new bill to President Donald Trump’s desk before the end of the month.

House and Senate negotiators announced an agreement was reached Saturday morning for a bill that would include new sanctions against Russia, Iran, and North Korea.
Despite the White House lobbying for changes to the measure, the legislation will give Congress a new ability to block the administration from easing sanctions on Moscow. Democrats and some Republicans have expressed concerns that Trump is considering giving Russia back two compounds in Maryland and New York that were seized by the Obama administration in December.
 Image result for photos of congress working on russian sanctions bill
“Given the many transgressions of Russia, and President Trump’s seeming inability to deal with them, a strong sanctions bill such as the one Democrats and Republicans have just agreed to is essential,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a statement. “I expect the House and Senate will act on this legislation promptly, on a broad bipartisan basis and send the bill to the President’s desk.”
“The House will vote on the bill on Tuesday (7/25, 2017), according to House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s schedule, and the Senate is likely to take it up after that, although Senate leaders haven’t said when they will bring it to the floor. Congressional aides say they expect Trump will sign the bill because it will likely pass both chambers with strong, veto-proof majorities.”
Image result for photos Dmitry Peskov
Dmitry Peskov

In a text message to CNN, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said he sees the agreement “quite negatively.”

“The agreement on the sanctions was the result of an often contentious, month-long back-and-forth between the House and Senate after the Senate passed a bill for new sanctions against Russia and Iran 98 to 2 in June.”
“The bill faced a so-called blue slip constitutional problem that revenue generating legislation must originate in the House. That was fixed after a negotiation between the two chambers, but then House Democrats objected to another tweak that removed their ability to force a vote to stop the easing of sanctions.”
Image result for photos of congress working on russian sanctions bill
“Numerous US companies also wanted changes over concerns the bill could inadvertently impact their businesses.”
“My preference over the last month had been for the House to take up and adopt the legislation that passed the Senate 98-2; however I welcome the House bill, which was the product of intense negotiations,” said Maryland Sen. Ben Cardin, the top Democrat on the Senate foreign relations committee. “I believe the proposed changes to the bill have helped to clarify the intent of members of Congress as well as express solidarity with our closest allies in countering Russian aggression and holding the Kremlin accountable for their destabilizing activities.”
“CNN reported Friday that the deal addressed some of the concerns of US companies while keeping in the congressional review portion, besides making technical changes. To address House Democrats’ complaints, the bill gives any House member the ability to force a vote to disapprove of sanctions if the Senate passes it first.”
Image result for photos steny hoyer

“The legislation ensures that both the majority and minority are able to exercise our oversight role over the administration’s implementation of sanctions,” House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer said in a statement Saturday. “I look forward to seeing this legislation on the Floor next week, where I’m confident it will receive strong, bipartisan support.”

“The bill was also changed to ensure that it didn’t affect a major pipeline used to transport oil from Kazakhstan through Russia to Ukraine as well as a natural gas pipeline that goes between Russia and Germany.”
“The revised bill also clarifies that American companies cannot do business with already-sanctioned defense interests in Russia, as there were concerns US companies that want to finalize transportation deals could be barred from doing so under the initial bill’s restrictions.”


  1. Gronda, I placed my comment by mistake in the previous post. If you could delete that one, I would appreciate it.

    I like this bill as it is a Republican led House and Senate telling the President “we do not trust you.” Keith

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Keith,

      I think that with Sen. John McCain in his predicament, may have touched some of their consciences. They have to know that he wants this passed.

      Hugs, Gronda


  2. Dear Mz. Gronda,

    I only hope that they manage to get that finalized prior to the tRump giving back the two properties to his best bud Putin! At this point the tRump is like a pole cat caught in a cage spraying every direction not caring who or what he hits!

    About the recess appointment, I put you a simple link so you would see what I was talking about! Ha, ha, you still don’t realize that more often than not when I make a statement like that, I have already verified the possibility! If you recall during the early part of Obama’s second term the Senate left five or six members in DC to daily make a roll call to keep a quorum to prevent Obama from making an appointment while they were on recess! So the Senate could take steps to prevent it from happening, but I don’t think they have enough courage to stand up to him! The congressional leadership are too afraid of his core voters and would rather give the nation to Putin than subject them selves to their wrath!!!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Crustyolemothman,

      I think the Senate will do likewise again. The last thing they would want is DDT making a mess while congress is in recess.

      Hugs, Gronda


  3. I am quite pleased on two fronts: 1) that both parties actually came together on something, and 2) that they are finally starting to stand up to the bully in the Oval Office! Thanks for the good news!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Dear !EarthUnited,

    If he pardons himself, as per the reference you forwarded, “Jonathan Turley, a professor at George Washington University Law School, said a president pardoning himself would raise serious questions “of an abuse of power”.

    “Abuse of power” is what impeaching a president is all about. Experts are saying this action would make him guilty of “obstruction of justice.

    The act of DDT pardoning himself would be tested in the courts with the Supreme court making the final decision. I am 99.9% certain that the justices would rule that he cannot pardon himself.

    But based on his past behaviors, he would probably give it a try.

    Hugs, Gronda


Comments are closed.