aside Roll back Of CFPB Rule Bars Consumers From Being Able To Sue Banks Like Wells Fargo

The roll backs of certain regulations like barring consumers from NOT being bound by arbitration clauses to where they can sue banks that have committed fraud like Wells Fargo or institutions like Equifax for extreme negligence, have nothing to do with helping average Joe workers whom President Donald Trump claimed to care about during the 2016 campaign season.

Banks and other institutions cannot be too big to fail. The republican talking point along the lines, that they are insuring more monies end up in the pockets of wronged customers than class action lawyers is laughable. Under the CFPB rule these clients could choose to arbitrate, or to file suit. The only beneficiaries of this roll back are the banks and Wall Street.

The (CFPB ) Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has been targeting regulations to reign in the billions of dollars in fees collected by payday lenders offering high-cost, short-term loans. The finalization of this regulation, now seems unlikely.

Here is the rest of the story…

On October 23, 2917, Renae Merle of the Washington Post penned the following report,  “Wall Street wins big as Senate votes to roll back regulation allowing consumers to sue their banks.”

Excerpts:

“Vice President Pence cast a tie-breaking vote late Tuesday to block new regulations allowing U.S. consumers to sue their banks, handing Wall Street and other big financial institutions their biggest victory since President Trump’s election.”

“The rules would have cost the industry billions of dollars, according to some estimates.  With the Senate’s vote, Wall Street is beginning to reap the benefits of the Trump administration focus on rolling back regulations it says are strangling the economy. The vote is also a major rebuke of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which wrote the rules, and has often found itself at odds of Republicans in Congress and the business community.”

Image result for photo of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau building

“At issue is the fine print in many of the agreements that consumers sign when they apply for credit cards or bank accounts. These agreements typically require them to settle any disputes they have with the company through arbitration, in which a third party rules on the matter, rather than going to court or joining a class-action lawsuit.”

“The CFPB rule would block mandatory arbitration clauses in some cases, potentially allowing millions of Americans to file or join a lawsuit to press their complaints.”

“After more than four hours of debate, the Senate voted 51 to 50 to block its implementation. Pence cast the final vote in favor of the measure shortly after 10 p.m. House Republicans already passed legislation to block the rule, which now needs the approval of President Trump.”

Image result for photo of congress voting on roll back CFPB RULE

“Tonight’s vote is a giant setback for every consumer in this country. Wall Street won and ordinary people lost,” CFPB Director Richard Cordray said in a statement minutes after the vote.”

“The measure was widely loathed on Wall Street and among Republicans in Congress, who called it a gift to plaintiffs’ attorneys. Critics argued the rule would trigger a flood of frivolous lawsuits and drive up credit card rates. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and several other business groups filed suit last month to block its implementation.”

“Today’s vote puts consumers first rather than class-action lawyers,” said Rob Nichols, president of the American Bankers Association. The Credit Union National Association said the rule “was just the latest example of the one-size-fits-all rule-making coming from the CFPB and thankfully Congress acted to remedy the situation.”

Image result for photo of congress voting on roll back CFPB RULE

“Proponents of the measure have dismissed such complaints. Class action lawsuits are a public way to force companies to change questionable business practices that would otherwise receive little attention. They also allow large groups of people to seek small amounts of money they individually wouldn’t have the time or money to pursue, supporters of the rule say.”

“To gain support for the legislation, Republicans in the Senate had to overcome a populist campaign led by Democrats and consumers groups linking the rule to the backlash against two big — and unpopular — financial firms, Wells Fargo and Equifax. Wells Fargo has been under pressure since admitting last year that employees had opened millions of sham accounts customers didn’t ask for, and Equifax is struggling to recover from a massive hack that affected more than 145 million people. Consumers groups have used both cases as a rallying cry against arbitration clauses, which Wells Fargo and Equifax both use.”

Tonight @VP Pence & the @SenateGOP gave a giant wet kiss to Wall Street. No wonder Americans think the system is rigged against them. It is.

 “Companies like Equifax and Wells Fargo have hurt millions of consumers and tried to escape accountability using forced arbitration clauses,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), a long-time critic of Wall Street, said on the Senate floor.”
Image result for photo of congress voting on roll back CFPB RULE

“Earlier this month, the agency finalized wide-ranging rules targeting the billions of dollars in fees collected by payday lenders offering high-cost, short-term loans immediately drawing industry protests. The Senate vote may indicate that the payday rule and other measures being contemplated to rein in debt collectors will face similar Republican resistance in Congress, industry analysts said. “The seemingly revitalized GOP/Trump administration commitment to deregulation,”  Charles Gabriel of Washington-based research firm Capital Alpha Partners said in a research note.”

Advertisements

6 comments

  1. Gronda, Trump followers need to clearly understand, this is the President and Congress thumbing their nose at consumers. The CFPB has been incredibly effective at penalizing banks, credit card companies and pay day lenders for screwing American consumers. Wells Fargo is a good example. Bank of America was fined for selling services that they were not asked to perform. Over 90% of the fines go to the impacted customers.

    Tell me again why this is a bad thing? It is hard to fathom how this is anything other than favoring the big companies. This change is not on the side of the Angels and shows Trump has little interest in representing the little guy. Keith

    • Dear Keith,

      President Trump and his sycophant republican legislators are clueless about how the average Joe lives paycheck to paycheck and they obviously don’t care about the harm their policies are doing.

      They are going to let the big banks get away with taking advantage of the average working peoples. It is not as if the banks didn’t do enough harm when they caused the 2008 recession..

      Hugs, Gronda

    • Dear !EarthUnited,

      Republicans are certainly not working to benefit the average Joe worker. This action helps the big guys on Wall Street. The republican party is becoming the “let them eat cake” party.

      Hugs, Gronda

  2. RWNJ RepubliKKKans always want to say that everyone is responsible for themselves, EXCEPT when it comes to them and their crooked cronies making money.

    • Dear Dreamer9177,

      What else is new. The republicans are rescuing the banking interests at the expense of its consumers. I am hoping that this reversal of a previous rule gets challenged in the court system.

      They are deregulating the rules so that we can suffer a repeat of what happened in 2008.

      Hugs, Gronda

Comment

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s