aside Evangelical Republican Dares to Compare President Trump To Winston Churchill

Image result for photos of mike huckabee

This tale has been created by the popular right wing pundit and former Governor of Arkansas, Mike Huckabee, one of those republican Evangelical sycophants who has been covering for a president who has a history of providing cover for racist hate groups, a braggart who openly admitted his penchant for grabbing women by their private parts with impunity, a congenital liar, a man who walks, talks and acts like a Russian asset, a person who turned his back on American citizens living in Puerto Rico in their time of need, and the list goes on.

I have been blogging about my antipathy for the mostly White Evangelical Cristians’ support for issues like abortion which have been weaponized for political reasons and in fact, are not based on principle. They use these issues as a prop to rationalize their providing cover for the likes of Donald J. Trump.

Their actions, their fruit prove that they are pro-birth only. And they don’t even do this well. For example, the USA suffers the highest percentages of infant mortality rates in comparison to all the other developed countries. This is because poor Mothers do not have the same level of pre-natal and post-natal medical care in the USA that is available in other developed countries around the world. (See: Infant Mortality Rates And Medicaid Expansion – Gronda Morin)

What concerns me is that these so called Christians have not really reckoned with the climate President Trump has created in our country which is counter to numerous long held Christian tenets such as NOT turning a blind eye to the actions of racists, NOT denying the science of climate change and thereby delaying/ hindering the implementation of solutions to mitigate for the inevitable negative consequences. As a result, the well-being of our nation is at risk.

Image result for photos of mike huckabee

They seem to think that by copying a tactic out of the republican President Donald J. Trump’s playbook, that one of their own can weave a completely false narrative as when comparing the president to Winston Churchill, many Americans  will not question this “fake news” tale. That may be true for those who have not read their history books.

Here is the rest of the story… 

On December 26, 2017, Maggie Astor of the New York Times penned the following report, “Mike Huckabee Says Trump Is Like Churchill. Historians Disagree.”


“Former Gov. Mike Huckabee of Arkansas drew a swift and intense response with a provocative claim on Tuesday (12/26/17): President Trump, he wrote, is similar to Winston Churchill, one of history’s most iconic leaders.”

Related image

“Mr. Huckabee had just watched “Darkest Hour,” a film about Churchill. It was, he wrote on Twitter, a reminder of “what real leadership looks like.”

“Churchill was hated by his own party, opposition party, and press,” he tweeted. “Feared by King as reckless, and despised for his bluntness. But unlike Neville Chamberlain, he didn’t retreat. We had a Chamberlain for 8 yrs; in @realDonaldTrump we have a Churchill.”

“Likening modern leaders to Chamberlain and Churchill — something Mr. Huckabee has done before — is always a loaded proposition. Chamberlain, who preceded Churchill as prime minister of Britain, tried to appease Hitler by conceding Czechoslovakia’s Sudetenland region to Nazi Germany in the 1938 Munich Agreement, and his name has come to be synonymous with weakness in the face of evil.”

Image result for photos of winston churchill

“Churchill, by contrast, was an officer in the British Army during World War I; led Britain through World War II as prime minister from 1940 to 1945; and handled several foreign policy crises in a second term as prime minister from 1951 to 1955. He was known for his skill as an orator and writer, and won the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1953.”

“Sure. Churchill served his country 55 years in parliament, 31 years as a minister and 9 as pm,” Kristian Tonning Riise, a member of Norway’s Parliament, wrote in a tweet liked more than 19,000 times. “He was present in 15 battles and received 14 medals of bravery. He was one of history’s most gifted orators and won the Nobel Literature Prize for his writing. Totally same thing.”

“It is true that Churchill made many political enemies before World War II, said Susan Pedersen, a professor of British history at Columbia University. He was also “more self-regarding and less inclined to compromise than most successful British politicians,” she said, and “had a hard-right view of British national and imperial interest.”

“He was basically in the wilderness in 1939, and had world history and circumstance not found him, that would have been the end of the story,” Dr. Pedersen wrote in an email. “Luckily for him, and for many of us, his peculiar attributes and the needs of the time came together. But that happened partly because, for all his idiosyncrasy, he had real intellectual and political strengths: He was intelligent, literate, well-versed in history, had long experience in government, and knew what he stood for.”


“The comparison to Mr. Trump, she wrote, is “ridiculous” — the same adjective David Del Testa, a historian at Bucknell University, used to describe the accompanying comparison of President Barack Obama to Neville Chamberlain.”

“Timothy Riley, director and chief curator of the National Churchill Museum at Westminster College in Missouri, said that Churchill “was bold and passionate about his beliefs” and, much like Mr. Trump, “was not afraid to speak his own mind and ruffle a few feathers along the way.” But for Churchill, Mr. Riley said, “the greatest task, his ‘supreme task,’ was to bring countries together to support peace and prosperity and, during the Second World War, to defeat tyranny.”

“And Dr. Del Testa said that after World War I, Churchill’s “self-celebratory style” was tempered by a newfound humility.”

“He was trying to keep Britain strong and create a world order that was strong for Britain, but he was also conscious increasingly in the 1920s and 1930s of a world order that could be destroyed by populist dictators,” he said.”

Related image

“Perhaps more significant than any of these specific contrasts, Mr. Riley said, is the timing of Mr. Huckabee’s comparison. It is much too early, he said, to try to draw a comparison between Churchill — whose career in public service spanned more than half a century and two world wars — and Mr. Trump, who has been in office for less than a year.”

“Among the qualities Churchill is known for are “his perseverance, his resilience and his long-term view of history,” Mr. Riley said, and “all of those qualities, I think, are best judged after some time.”


  1. When Mr Huckabee first came to my notice it was as a congressman..he kept most of his far right ideology quiet. People admired him and were proud of the work he did for the state. Then, he came onto a more public stage and his real beliefs started to be expressed…and he fell from grace so far as I was concerned. He is now nothing more than a toady for the far-right evangelical nutcases.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Suze,

      I used to think kindly of Mike Huckabee as well, but I no longer do. Folks like him are doing a lot of harm which is bad enough, but when they use the name of God to justify their lack of integrity, they have gone too far. I am no longer buying their B.S.

      Hugs, Gronda


  2. What an inept comparison Huckabee makes! Has the man completely lost what few marbles were left in his head? While I am not a fan of Churchill, I do acknowledge that he had leadership abilities, strengths and intellect that the clown in the White House cannot even begin to come close to. There was a time when I respected Mike Huckabee … that time has long passed. Good post, Gronda.


    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Jill,

      I am planning to see the movie “Darkest Hour” and I suspect that the last name I would think of is President Trump, an empty shell of a man. This is like an insult to the memory of Winston Churchill, who for all his shortcomings, was a man of substance.

      Can you believe that Mike Huckabee claims to be a history buff? He needs to do some brushing up on his history.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I think the war would have been a lot different were it not for Mr Churchill for whom I have a lot of time. I feel personally insulted that one half assed politician should compare Churchill to an even more half assed politician with whom he shares very little by comparison. I think if we waited a lot more years, and followed Trump through a war (which he’s probably caused) I’d still find the comparisons laughable.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear David Prosser,

      I agree with your thinking 100%. The comparison is an insult and its declaration reflects poorly on Mike Huckabee, a former Evangelical pastor. These folks have a tendency to want to write their own history books which are definitely not fact-based.

      Hugs, Gronda


  4. Gronda, this is right out of the Trump playbook. One person with an audience says something. It will be reported that he said it. Another will say. Then Trump will say “people are talking about me being like Churchill…” The fact he has little similarity to Churchill is irrelevant.

    To me this is part and parcel to the active disinformation campaign to combat the Mueller investigation. At one time, I held Huckabee in greater esteem before he felt he needed to cater to the extreme right. Keith

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Keith,

      Anyone criticizing the FBI’s Mueller Trump/ Russian probe are definitely not patriots. They are placing the success of their party, over their duty to protect its citizens, our democracy and our “constitution.”

      Mr. Huckabee like many other president’s republican sycophants have sold their souls for monies and greed and thus, he has lost my respect. But his daughter has a great job in the White House. For me, both have lost their credibility.

      Hugs, Gronda


Comments are closed.