aside President Trump Is Talking About Sending Back Refugees Without Due Process

My first instinct was to think, not even the republican President Donald Trump could get away with ordering that illegal immigrants be deported immediately with “no judges or court cases,” as these mostly refugees try to request asylum at the US southwestern border.

But, on second thought, this is President Trump who we are talking about, and we all know that if he could figure out a way to accomplish this goal, he would act. The judicial system be damned.

There are even rumors that the president’s administration has been dangling contracts to offer these refugees the chance to be reunited with their children if they agree to return to their countries of origin. But the president’s administration may not even know where the 2,300 plus children, who had already been separated after April 2018 based on his new -0- tolerance immigration policy, are located.

Remember that President Trump didn’t give it a second thought when he instituted his new immigration “zero tolerance” policy via his Attorney General Jeff Sessions’  memo, dated April 6, 2018.

The president’s cabinet members and spokespeople were announcing that if refugees did not enter at designated US points of entry, there was the -0- tolerance rule in play, where every parent would be detained and prosecuted for a misdemeanor. It was at this point that the children were forcibly separated from their Moms and Dads for indeterminate periods of time.

As per Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), the president could have ended this practice of separating children from the parents with one phone call at any time. Directing the migrants to apply for asylum at the US designated points of entry was a red herring as most refugees were being turned away at these designated points. There have been numerous documented stories detailing how peoples have been waiting for weeks to gain entry as well as instances where children were still being forcibly separated from their parents, even at these points of entry.

See: President Is Basing Immigration Policy Decisions On His Racist Bias/ Grondamorin 

But this time “we the people” stood up with public outrage and made the president backtrack on this immoral policy. We had figured out that the President’s new immigration protocol enacted on April 6, 2018 was based on the myth that there was an immigration crisis, so that he could look strong and tough with the hard-line anti-immigration faction of his base. And so, the president was forced to end parts of it on the 20th of June 2018.

See: Trump created the immigration crisis out of sheer ignorance and cruelty/ Washington Post


Here’s the rest of the story...

On June 24, 2018, Doina Chiacu and Sarah N. Lynch of Reuters penned the following report, “Trump says illegal immigrants should be deported with ‘no judges or court cases’

“President Donald Trump said on Sunday that people who enter the United States illegally should be sent back immediately to where they came from without any judicial process, likening them to invaders who are trying to “break into” the country.”

“His proposal drew immediate criticism from legal analysts and immigrant rights advocates who said it would violate the U.S. Constitution’s due process provision, which applies to citizens and non-citizens alike.”

“In a series of tweets on Sunday, Trump said: “We cannot allow all of these people to invade our Country. When somebody comes in, we must immediately, with no Judges or Court Cases, bring them back from where they came.”

“Cannot accept all of the people trying to break into our Country. Strong Borders, No Crime!”

“It was unclear if Trump was advocating an expansion of the provision that allows expedited removals of illegal immigrants at or near the U.S. border, a policy his administration has embraced since he took office. Nor did Trump differentiate between illegal immigrants and people who entered the United States to seek asylum protection.”

“The president of the United States has just forcefully proposed the end of political asylum and no due process for migrants,” Sherrilyn Ifill, president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, wrote on Twitter.”

“Lee Gelernt, the deputy director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, told Reuters: “The administration cannot simply get rid of all process for immigrants. The due process clause absolutely applies. It’s not a choice.”

“Authorities can bypass due process protections with the expedited removals policy that allows quick deportations if an immigrant is apprehended within 100 miles (160 km) of the border and has been in the country less than 14 days. Those seeking asylum must be granted a hearing.”

“Trump’s tweets on Sunday came after a week of global outcry over images and video of crying children and their distraught parents separated at the U.S.-Mexico border. Critics in Trump’s Republican Party, as well as his wife and daughter, urged him to abandon the policy.”

“The president buckled to the pressure on Wednesday (6/20/18), issuing an executive order that ended the separations. But the government has yet to reunite more than 2,000 (plus) children with their parents.” (The 2000 number is from May 2018.)”


“But Trump’s frustration over the issue only grew. He has issued a drumbeat of criticism of the immigration system and Democrats in Congress, while using increasingly harsh terms such as “invasion” and “infestation” to describe illegal immigration.”

“Here, I think he is making it clear, he just doesn’t want anybody here. He wants people to just be sent back, no matter what,” said Jorge Baron, executive director for the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, who compared Sunday’s tweets with comments Trump was reported to have made in January about immigrants from “shithole” countries.”


“While some who advocate for stricter immigration rules have argued that people are making fraudulent asylum claims or abusing the loopholes in U.S. immigration laws, Baron said Trump’s views went way beyond those arguments.”

“Trump’s “zero tolerance” policy of prosecuting adults for entering the country illegally entails a process that typically takes many months. That required children to be separated from parents because they are not legally allowed to be kept in detention for more than 20 days.”

“Keeping the children with their migrant parents as they await court proceedings faces obstacles, however, including the lack of sufficient housing, a paucity of immigration judges and a daunting backlog of cases.”

“Under expedited removal proceedings, which are used most commonly at ports of entry, an immigration official can evaluate an immigrant’s claim and reject it with no involvement by an immigration judge or review board.”

“The Trump administration called last year for the expansion of the expedited removals program to immigrants who have been in the country illegally for up to two years.”

“There is an exception from expedited removal for those with a credible fear of returning home.”

“Lindsay Harris, an assistant professor of law at the University of the District of Columbia, said those with no credible fear could still see a judge, while those with such a fear could begin a long legal process that eventually could result in asylum and applying for a work permit.”

“It’s already an extremely truncated process,” the ACLU’s Gelernt said. “The president’s suggestion that there is a ton of process for these individuals is simply wrong. There are already people being removed with a truncated process.”


  1. The trouble he is building up for himself is that when he finally ceases to be president, someone might well be able to use this as a precedence for hauling him before a tribunal or committee to answer some ‘difficult’ questions.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Gronda, this man only favors the rule of law when it works for him. This statement he made speaks volumes, but is lost on his forgiving followers. Keith

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Keith,

      I am so sick over this. Knowing that babies were taken away from their parents is like watching a horror show where one is limited to intervene or help.

      I was just mentioning to Roger that for someone to get away with doing evil deeds is for good peoples to do absolutely nothing. This is how I see the republicans in the US Congress.

      Hugs, Gronda


  3. Dear Roger,

    He is literally a monster. I wish that the UK hadn’t invited him to be a guest.

    Yes, as far as I’m concerned he is committing crimes against humanity and he should be made to answer for his actions.

    For someone to get away with evil, all that is required is for good people to do nothing. These are the republicans in the US Congress.

    I used to wonder how the peoples of Germany could have been guilty of such horrors but now, I know.

    Hugs, Gronda


Comments are closed.