President Trump Refuses To Defend USA Which Was Attacked By Foreign Power Russia

Image result for photos trump putin arriving in finland

Update: President Trump has been in the bi-lateral meeting with the Russia President Putin for about 2 hours and 10 minutes. Both did have interpreters present.

The Russian president has been shunned from the world stage because of his actions like the 2014 unprovoked invasion and illegal annexation of Crimea, Ukraine; the poisoning of peoples in the UK; his support of the brutal Syrian leader Bashar-al-Assad who has gassed his own peoples; and for managing a full throttle attack in US politics, especially during the 2016 US presidential elections; his interference in the politics of other countries; and let’s not forget the shooting down of the Malaysian airlines in 2014.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

The questions is, why did the republican President Donald Trump continue to insist on executing his plan to have his tete-a-tete with the Russian President Putin on the 16th of July 2018 in Helsinki, Finland, despite the US Deputy Attorney General Attorney Rod Rosenstein having announced on the 13th of July, that the US department of Justice had filed indictments against 12 Russian GRU operatives for having interfered with the 2016 US election in order to effect the outcome in favor of Mr. Trump? There is conflicting reporting as to whether or not, there will even be translators in the one-to-one meeting between the two presidents who will be conversing with no note-takers or witnesses present.

See: Mueller probe indictment of 12 Russians for hacking Democrats/ Washington Post

President Trump can no longer live in that reality TV world where his discounting of Russia’s full throttle attack on the US presidential elections infrastructure in 2016 isn’t viewed with suspicion. He is supposed to be defending this country, the USA, as per his oath of office instead of rewarding our attacker. Russia”s President Vladimir Putin with a ticket to the world stage.

Why is the US President turning his back on the US national security interests?

The New York Times columnist, Charles M. Blow, answers this question.

Related image
PRESIDENTIAL PALACE

Here is the rest of the story…

On July 15, 2018, Charles Blow penned the following op-ed piece, Trump, Treasonous Traitor” (“The president fails to protect the country from an ongoing attack.”)

Excerpts:

“Put aside whatever suspicions you may have about whether Donald Trump will be directly implicated in the Russia investigation.”

“Trump is right now, before our eyes and those of the world, committing an unbelievable and unforgivable crime against this country. It is his failure to defend.”

Image result for photos trump putin arriving in finland

“The intelligence community long ago concluded that Russia attacked our election in 2016 with the express intention of damaging Hillary Clinton and assisting Trump.”

“And it was not only the spreading of inflammatory fake news over social media. As a May report from the Republican-run Senate Intelligence Committee pointed out:”

“In 2016, cyber actors affiliated with the Russian Government conducted an unprecedented, coordinated cyber campaign against state election infrastructure. Russian actors scanned databases for vulnerabilities, attempted intrusions, and in a small number of cases successfully penetrated a voter registration database. This activity was part of a larger campaign to prepare to undermine confidence in the voting process.”

Image result for PHOTOS OF DAN COATS

“And this is not simply a thing that happened once. This is a thing that is still happening and will continue to happen. As Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats told the committee in February, “Persistent and disruptive cyberoperations will continue against the United States and our European allies using elections as opportunities to undermine democracy.” As he put it, “Frankly, the United States is under attack.”

“The Robert Mueller investigation is looking into this, trying to figure out what exactly happened in 2016, who all was involved, which laws where broken and who will be charged and tried.”

That investigation seems to be incredibly fruitful. According to Vox’s tally:

“Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team has either indicted or gotten guilty pleas from 32 people and three companies — that we know of. That group is composed of four former Trump advisers, 26 Russian nationals, three Russian companies, one California man, and one London-based lawyer. Five of these people (including three former Trump aides) have already pleaded guilty.”

Image result for photos robert mueller and his team
ROBERT MUELLER

Twelve of those indictments came last week with a disturbingly detailed account of what the Russians did. As The New York Times put it:

“From phishing attacks to gain access to Democratic operatives, to money laundering, to attempts to break into state elections boards, the indictment details a vigorous and complex effort by Russia’s top military intelligence service to sabotage the campaign of Mr. Trump’s Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton.”

“Whether or not Trump himself or anyone in his orbit personally colluded or conspired with the Russians about their interference is something Mueller will no doubt disclose at some point, but there remains one incontrovertible truth: In 2016, Russia, a hostile foreign adversary, attacked the United States of America.”

Image result for photos trump putin arriving in finland

“We know that they did it. We have proof.”

“And yet Trump, the president whom the Constitution establishes as the commander in chief, has repeatedly waffled on whether Russia conducted the attack and has refused to forcefully rebuke them for it, let alone punish them for it.”

“In March, the White House, under pressure from Congress, seemed to somewhat reluctantly impose some sanctions on Russia for its crimes. As CNN reported that month, Congress almost unanimously passed the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act last summer, “hoping to pressure Trump into punishing Russia for its election interference.” But as the network pointed out:”

“Trump signed the bill reluctantly in August, claiming it impinged upon his executive powers and could dampen his attempts to improve ties with Moscow.”

“Instead, Trump has repeatedly attacked the investigation as a witch hunt.”

Theresa May and Trump speak behind their respective podiums
TRUMP/ MAY

Just last week at a joint press conference with British Prime Minister Theresa May, Trump said:

“I think I would have a very good relationship with Putin if we spend time together. After watching the rigged witch-hunt yesterday, I think it really hurts our country and our relationship with Russia. I hope we can have a good relationship with Russia.”

“Now Trump is set to pursue just such a relationship as he meets one-on-one with the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, on Monday in Finland. As Trump said earlier this month at a rally:”

Related image

“Will he be prepared? Will he be prepared? And I might even end up having a good relationship, but they’re going, ‘Will President Trump be prepared? You know, President Putin is K.G.B. and this and that.’ You know what? Putin’s fine. He’s fine. We’re all fine. We’re people.”

“Actually, none of this is fine. Trump should be directing all resources at his disposal to punish Russia for the attacks and prevent future ones. But he is not.”

“America’s commander wants to be chummy with the enemy who committed the crime. Trump is more concerned with protecting his presidency and validating his election than he is in protecting this country.”

3 comments

  1. Charles Blow penned the following op-ed piece, “Trump, Treasonous Traitor” (“The president fails to protect the country from an ongoing attack.”)

    Gronda, perhaps half of Americans simply do not perceive Russia as a physical threat. We are not in the midst of a cold war, Putin is very popular all around the world, and a highly regarded leader. He does very well for his country, with an 80 ~ 90+ approval rating from his own ppl. Compare that to Trump’s abysmal numbers.

    Yes I will admit that Putin did pull some strings behind the scenes to manipulate US voter perception of the candidates. Yes he’s all in for Trump winning to serve Russia’s interests. But all the other allegations about “bad dictator” Putin I would have to respectfully disagree with. Much of the Western Press has done itself a huge disservice by printing sensationalist half truths and outright lies about Russia and Putin. The MSM press is actually discrediting itself every time it has to print a retraction about some Russian rumour not based on factual evidence but innuendos and gossip. It’s this type of loose reporting standards which led Trump to start the “Fake News” movement against the propaganda press in our country.

    Let’s do a hypothetical, if Hillary had won the election, would the MSM press be pounding the headlines regarding Russian hacking and how Russia attacked our democracy? I would think not!

    Of course Trump cannot call Putin out directly or forcefully b/c that would imply that his election victory would be lie, and his ego cannot accept that reality. In a way he’s forced to uphold his conservative narrative and blame everything on the Democrats. His well oiled propaganda machines InfoWars and FOX News serving as the cultural counterbalance to the Neo-Liberal globalist agenda.

    And that’s primarily why America is experiencing such a divisive, harsh political war of ideology. A country divided will most certainly fall. Cui bono? It looks like Putin wins again b/c Trump would most certainly do nothing to defend our country’s interests. Oh well…. 😦

    Like

    • Dear 1EarthUnited,

      You are going to be shocked by the reaction of the vast majority as to how Americans really feel about President Putin having directed an attack in the 2016 US elections, especially after the president equivocated about this at the press conference today with President Putin.

      President Putin may be popular in his own country but it could help that he kills off opponents, controls what the press writes, etc.

      For example, As per a 3/12/18 National Review report, “The main opposition leader is not available to run. He — Boris Nemtsov — was murdered within sight of the Kremlin three years ago. Today’s main opposition leader, Alexei Navalny, is not available to run either. He’s not dead yet. He has suffered various physical attacks, but he’s still above ground. He is simply barred from running.”

      “George W. Bush, In an interview with me two years ago, brought up Putin (unprompted) in a discussion of strongmen and dictators: “People say, ‘He’s the most popular guy in Russia.’ I say, ‘Yeah, I’d be popular too if I owned NBC,’” and the other networks.”

      “Again, I quote Russians: Putin censors the media, monopolizes the media. He jails or otherwise silences his critics. He does not allow genuine opposition. He does not allow free and fair elections.”

      He is not popular around the world but he is more popular than President Trump, but that is not saying a lot.. Why do you think he has been shunned from the world stage?

      I respectfully disagree with some of your premises.

      Hugs, Gronda Morin

      Liked by 1 person

      • I understand, there’s really no right or wrong on the matter of world leaders. It’s all perception, how the press choose to spin it, how ppl are willing to receive the news and try to form our own rational opinions. News sources are inherently biased, they serve to promote a specific agenda. In that sense anyone can be portrayed as an angel or devil, but who really controls the narrative behind the scenes?

        Also actions speak louder than words. I would need absolute concrete evidence, as close to 100% truth before I make up my mind and believe any news story. This goes for all sources, conservative or liberal. But I admit I especially distrust anything that comes out of the mouth of our IC. Sadly they are controlled, bought and sold a very long time ago. Their actions speak all too loud and clear to me.

        All I need are facts, not useless “indictments” that supposedly tell some kind of bigger story where it leads to this and that. I’ll be waiting for SC Mueller’s finished work product with hard ironclad proof. And that would be the end of that story. But before that it’s all he said she said useless opinions.

        Thanks for listening to my rant! 🙂

        Like

Comment

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.