It’s About Time: The IC Community Is Addressing Russia’s Attack On Our US Election Infrastructure

 

Image result for photos nielsen wray
DAN COATS/ FRED WRAY/ PAUL NAKASONE/ KIRSTJEN NIELSON

Thank goodness the Intelligence Community agency heads decided to go public on the 2nd of August 2018, about what they are doing to address Russia’s attack on the US elections infrastructure.  In short, the IC Community is taking the lead in doing something to tackle this very real problem.

It is my opinion, that these leaders are doing the clean-up for the republican President Donald J. Trump who has been MIA on this issue.

Image result for photos nielsen wray

Here’s the rest of the story…

On August 2, 2018, Shane Harris and Felicia Somnez of the Washington Post penned the following report, “Trump administration stresses its focus on election security amid criticism”

Excerpts:

“Top national security officials made a rare appearance in the White House briefing room Thursday to warn that Russia continues to target U.S. elections and to outline what is being done to combat the interference.”

Image result for photos nielsen wray

“In regards to Russian involvement in the midterm elections, we continue to see a pervasive messaging campaign by Russia to try to weaken and divide the United States,” Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats said. “We know there are others who have the capability and may be considering influence activities.”

“The joint appearance by Coats, Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen, national security adviser John Bolton, FBI Director Christopher A. Wray and National Security Agency Director Paul Nakasone comes as the administration is facing criticism over its efforts to deal with election interference and continuing questions over how seriously President Trump takes the threat.”

Image result for photos nielsen wray
DAN COATS/ CHRISTOPHER WRAY

“Lawmakers and independent analysts say that U.S. voting systems are more secure against hackers, thanks to action at the federal and state levels — and that the Russians have not targeted those systems to the degree they did in 2016.”

But Russian efforts to manipulate U.S. voters through misleading social media postings are likely to have grown more sophisticated and harder to detect, and there is not a sufficiently strong government strategy to combat information warfare against the United States, outside experts warn.

“Glad to see the White House finally do something about election security – even if it’s only a press conference,” Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a tweet. “Now if only it was actually backed up by anything the President has said or done on Russia.”

Image result for PHOTOS OF SENATOR MARK WARNER

“Thursday’s (8/2/18) news conference was the first time that the heads of the intelligence and law enforcement agencies with a role in preventing election interference have appeared together to address the threat. Their joint appearance follows a meeting last week of the National Security Council on election security, the first Trump has led on the matter, which lasted less than an hour and produced no new orders on how to counter or deter the interference.”

“The agency leaders announced no new policies and in some instances did not directly answer questions about what particular guidance or orders they were given to counteract Russian moves.”

“The officials described Russian actions observed to date as significant but not as multifaceted as those that intelligence agencies saw during the 2016 campaign.”

Image result for photos nielsen wray
CHRISTOPHER WRAY

“We are not yet seeing the same kinds of efforts to specifically target election infrastructure” as in 2016, Wray said, referring to Russian penetration of voter rolls and other efforts to attack the machinery that collects and tabulates vote counts.”

“Hours earlier, a bipartisan group of senators unveiled legislation that would impose aggressive new sanctions on Russia. The move represents the latest attempt by lawmakers to push congressional leaders to intensify punitive measures against would-be election hackers and symbolizes their growing frustration with the White House, which has sent mixed messages on Russia’s attempts to manipulate the American electorate and so far has declined to fully implement sanctions already available to the administration.”

Link to entire article: Trump administration stresses its focus on election security 

Image result for photos nielsen wray

“As per July 27, 2018 New York Times report by David E. Sanger, “State-sponsored Russian hackers appear far more interested this year in demonstrating that they can disrupt the American electric utility grid than the midterm elections, according to United States intelligence officials and technology company executives.”

“Despite attempts to infiltrate the online accounts of two Senate Democrats up for re-election, intelligence officials said they have seen little activity by Russian military hackers aimed at either major American political figures or state voter registration systems.”

“By comparison, according to intelligence officials and executives of the companies that oversee the world’s computer networks, there is surprisingly far more effort directed at implanting malware in the electrical grid.”

“The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence findings, but their conclusions were confirmed by several executives of technology and technology security firms.”

Link to entire article: Russian Hackers Appear to Shift Focus to U.S. Power Grid

See: A growing concern that the nation is not protected from Russian interference

5 comments

  1. Gronda, let’s hope it is more than window dressing, as it must be more than words. It also is not humorous that after this professional press conference over Russia cyber attacks on America, the US President did his usual banter at a pep rally that the Russia thing is all a hoax. That is not fake news that intelligence officials directly contradicted the President. His own staff did.

    On the same concept, but different subject, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo directly contradicted the President on his assertion of no preconditions on meeting with Iran. Plus, daughter Ivanka contradicted her father that the press is not the enemy of the people. These are not fake news stories. People who work for Trump are openly disagreeing with the boss. Keith

    Like

    • Dear Keith,

      It is my opinion that anything the president says about US elections has the weight of hot air and not even that. But it is my perception that IC heads like Dan Coats, Chris Wray and others are reliable and will do their best in an absence of leadership from the top.

      Now even Melania is even trolling the president. He is going to become awfully lonely at the White House as he continues to play to his base in a myriad of forms.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Like

  2. When I read “… there is not a sufficiently strong government strategy to combat information warfare against the United States” I think that the ‘strategy’ needs to be the education of the American public. Well educated people are far less likely to fall for false rhetoric than those who don’t even understand how our government works. And yet, instead of digging in and attempting to educate people, we scale back on education. A conscientious government would be putting out public service announcements, assisting the media in getting the word out about these hoaxsters. Instead, our “leader” plays footsies with the perpetrator of false information.

    I am, however, pleased to see that the Intelligence community is finally stepping up to the plate despite their boss’ lack of support.

    Hugs!!!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Jill,

      I believe the Intelligence Community officials like Dan Coats are for real and will do their best in an absence/ vacuum of leadership from the White House and the GOP in the US Congress.

      I worry that state officials are not required to work with the Intelligence community personnel, especially those in Republican led states.

      You are so right on the money. Educating the public about what is going on would go a long way to help out but I’m afraid this isn’t going to happen anytime soon.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 1 person

      • I agree that I think they are men and women of integrity. But, to an extent, their jobs rely on Trump, so there is a point at which they are likely to do as he wishes. I feel like this ball of yarn is unraveling these days. All of it. Hugs, my friend!

        Liked by 1 person

Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.