President Trump Can’t Keep Track Of His Lies Over Hush Monies Paid To His Paramours

Image result for photos of donald trump and hope hicks

The Analysis of how the “Big Whopper” or “the Big Lie,” not to be confused with tall fish tales, evolved over time as told by the republican President Donald Trump:

Here’s the rest of the story as detailed by the fact checker, Glenn Kessler…

On the 22nd of August 2018, Glenn Kessler, fact checker for the Washington Post penned the following analysis, “Not just misleading. Not merely false. A lie.”


“The first denial that Donald Trump knew about hush-money payments to silence women came four days before he was elected president, when his spokeswoman Hope Hicks said, without hedging, “We have no knowledge of any of this.”

Image result for PHOTOS OF Raj Shah and Sarah Huckabee Sanders

“The second came in January of this year, when his attorney Michael Cohen said the allegations were “outlandish.” By March, 2 of the president’s spokesmen — Raj Shah and Sarah Huckabee Sanders — said publicly that Trump denied all the allegations.  Even Cohen’s attorney, David Schwartz, got in on the action, saying the president “was not aware of any of it.”

“In April, Trump finally weighed in, answering a question about whether he knew about a payment to porn star Stephanie Clifford, who uses the stage name Stormy Daniels, with a flat “no.”

“It’s now clear that the president’s statement was a lie — and that the people speaking for him repeated it.”

“One of the distinguishing characteristics of Donald Trump’s presidency has been his loose relationship with facts. As of the beginning of this month, The Washington Post’s Fact Checker had documented 4,229 false or misleading claims from the president — an average of nearly 7.6 a day.”

“Trump’s allies have defended the president by suggesting that facts are debatable. Early in his presidency, one aide famously said he was operating with “alternative facts.” On Aug. 19, Trump attorney Rudolph W. Giuliani declared: “Truth isn’t truth.”

“How to characterize Trump’s statements has become its own pitched political battle, with many of the president’s critics demanding that they be called “lies.” The Fact Checker has been hesitant to go that far, as it is difficult to document whether the president knows he is not telling the truth.”

Image result for PHOTOS OF Rudolph W. Giuliani

“On Aug. 22, Sanders said during a White House briefing that it was “a ridiculous accusation” to say the president has lied to the American people.”

“But this week’s guilty plea by Cohen offers indisputable evidence that Trump and his allies have been deliberately dishonest at every turn in their statements regarding payments to Daniels and Playboy model Karen McDougal.”

“Here is the definitive story of a Trump lie:”

MICHAEL COHEN /Drew Angerer/Getty Images

The initial lie: ‘no knowledge’

Nov. 4, 2016: “The Wall Street Journal reports days before the election that the National Enquirer agreed to pay $150,000 to McDougal, a former Playboy centerfold model, for an account of an alleged affair with Trump but did not publish it, part of a “catch and kill” operation.”

“The publisher of the National Enquirer, American Media Inc., issues a statement: “AMI has not paid people to kill damaging stories about Mr. Trump.” Trump campaign spokeswoman Hope Hicks says: “We have no knowledge of any of this.”

Image result for PHOTOS David J. Pecker,

What we know now: “In August 2015, Cohen; David Pecker, the chairman of AMI; and “one or more members of the campaign” forged an agreement under which AMI would deal with negative stories about Trump’s “relationships with women” by purchasing the stories and then not publishing anything, according to the criminal information filed by federal prosecutors in the Cohen case. (In court, Cohen said he took action “at the request of the candidate” and knew it was illegal.) In August 2016, McDougal was paid $150,000 by AMI for the rights to her story — which the National Enquirer never published.”

More revelations, more disinformation

Jan. 12, 2018: “The Wall Street Journal exposes the $130,000 payment to Daniels. Cohen and the White House sidestep questions about the payment but deny that an affair between Daniels and Trump ever took place. “This is now the second time that you are raising outlandish allegations against my client,” Cohen tells the Journal. “You have attempted to perpetuate this false narrative for over a year; a narrative that has been consistently denied by all parties since at least 2011.”

Jan. 18: White House spokesman Raj Shah dodges questions about Daniels by telling reporters: “This matter was asked and answered during the campaign, and anything else could be directed to Michael Cohen.”

Image result for PHOTOS David J. Pecker,

The lie evolves: Cohen made the payments on his own

Feb. 13: “Cohen tells the New York Times he used his own funds to pay Daniels. “Neither the Trump Organization nor the Trump campaign was a party to the transaction with Ms. Clifford, and neither reimbursed me for the payment, either directly or indirectly,” he says. “The payment to Ms. Clifford was lawful, and was not a campaign contribution or a campaign expenditure by anyone.”

What we know now: “Cohen, in pleading guilty to 2 felony violations of campaign finance law, said he was reimbursed by the Trump Organization. Court filings showed that the company “grossed up” the payments to cover Cohen’s taxes and added a bonus, for a total of $420,000 in payments, according to the criminal information.”

Related image

Trump’s spokesmen keep saying he ‘was not aware of any of it’

March 7: White House press secretary Sanders asserts that the president told her he was unaware of the payments. “I’ve had conversations with the president about this,” she says. “There was no knowledge of any payments from the president, and he’s denied all of these allegations.” She adds: “Anything beyond that, I would refer you to the president’s outside counsel.”

March 9: “Michael Avenatti, Daniels’s lawyer, discloses emails showing that Cohen used his Trump Organization email address when he arranged the $130,000 wire transfer. Cohen tells ABC News that he used his own funds: “The funds were taken from my home equity line and transferred internally to my LLC account in the same bank.” He says the use of the Trump Organization email address meant nothing because “I basically used it for everything.”

March 26: “After Daniels appears on CBS’s “60 Minutes” to describe the alleged affair, White House spokesman Raj Shah sidesteps a question about whether the Trump campaign violated campaign finance laws, referring reporters to Cohen. “The president strongly, clearly and consistently denied the underlying claims.”

Image result for IMAGES OF David Schwartz ATTORNEY TO cohen

March 28: “David Schwartz, an attorney for Cohen, tells CNN that Trump was completely unaware of the payment. “The president was not aware of the agreement. At least Michael Cohen never told him about the agreement. I can tell you that,” he says. Asked whether Trump was aware of the money, Schwartz affirms: “He was not aware of any of it.”

What we know now: “Cohen, in making his guilty plea, said he worked “in coordination with and at the direction of a candidate for federal office,” referring to Trump, to make payments to thwart McDougal and Daniels from telling their stories.”

March 29: “Schwartz tells NBC News that Trump “100 percent” did not reimburse Cohen.”

Image result for IMAGES OF David Schwartz ATTORNEY TO cohen

Trump weighs in: ‘I don’t know’

April 5: “Trump flatly tells reporters he did not know about the $130,000 payment.”

Reporter: “Did you know about the $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels?”

Trump: “No, no.”

Reporter: “Then why did Michael Cohen make [the payment], if there was no truth to her allegations?”

Trump: “You’ll have to ask Michael Cohen. Michael’s my attorney, and you’ll have to ask Michael.”

Reporter: “Do you know where he got the money to make that payment?”

Trump: “No. I don’t know.”

What we know now: “Every answer was false. Trump knew about the payment, he knew Cohen made the payment as part of an effort to kill damaging stories, and he knew Cohen was reimbursed.”

The lie shifts again: Trump ‘did know about the general arrangement’

April 26: “The White House spin starts to shift after Cohen’s office is raided by federal prosecutors on April 9. Trump tells Fox News: “Michael would represent me, and represent me on some things. He represents me — like with this Stormy Daniels deal, he represented me.”

May 2: “Giuliani tells Fox News that Trump paid Cohen back for the $130,000 payment, but it could not be considered a campaign finance violation.”

“They funneled it through the law firm, and the president repaid it,” Giuliani says, adding that it “is going to turn out to be perfectly legal. That money was not campaign money. Sorry, I’m giving you a fact now that you don’t know. It’s not campaign money, no campaign finance violation.”

Image result for PHOTOS OF Rudolph W. Giuliani

“Giuliani suggests Trump was largely in the dark about what the money was used for. “He didn’t know about the specifics of it, as far as I know. But he did know about the general arrangement, that Michael would take care of things like this,” he says.”

May 3: “Trump tweets about the supposed arrangement. “Mr. Cohen, an attorney, received a monthly retainer, not from the campaign and having nothing to do with the campaign, from which he entered into, through reimbursement, a private contract between two parties, known as a non-disclosure agreement, or NDA,” he says, adding: “Money from the campaign, or campaign contributions, played no roll [sic] in this transaction.”

What we know now: “This was a lie. Cohen did not get repaid through a monthly retainer. He sought reimbursement for the payment, and the Trump Organization agreed to pay $420,000, at a monthly rate of $35,000, according to court filings. The company then falsely listed the payments in its books as a retainer for legal work. The monthly invoices Cohen submitted were not in connection for any legal services he had provided in 2017,” prosecutors wrote.”

The lie unravels

May 4: “Giuliani releases a statement in which he claims the payment to Daniels was intended only to “protect the president’s family” from painful publicity about an alleged affair and that “it would have been done in any event, whether he was a candidate or not.”

What we know now: “The deal with Daniels was part of an arrangement to shield Trump from negative stories that was hatched by Cohen, AMI and the Trump campaign shortly after he started running for president.”

July 24:” Cohen attorney Lanny Davis releases a recording that Cohen had secretly made of a conversation with Trump two months before the election, in which the two discussed the arrangement with the National Enquirer to pay $150,000 to McDougal.”

Aug. 21: “Cohen, in court, implicates Trump by admitting that the hush-money payments had been intended to help the campaign. The payment to Daniels was deemed an excessive campaign contribution by Cohen — and the McDougal payment from AMI violated a ban on corporate donations to campaigns.”


Aug. 22: “In a Fox News interview, Trump sought to reframe the issue. He insisted that the payments had not been a “campaign violation.” The payments “didn’t come out of the campaign,” he said. “They came from me.”

He’s still lying.


  1. Gronda, I like the phrase “deliberately dishonest” as it defines the President. Maybe we call him Triple D as in “Deliberately Dishonest Donald.”

    Liked by 3 people

    • Dear Keith,

      The president doesn’t know how to not tell a lie. That is the world he lives in, the one that he creates. He has put his foot in his own mouth, more often than not. The triple “D” description fits him like a glove, “Deliberately Dishonest Donald.”

      Hugs, Gronda


    • Dear Rob,

      This is the tale of a lie being a lie, and nothing but a lie, vs. Rudy Giuliani’s recent quote, “Truth Isn’t Always Truth, instead of the truth is truth.

      These are crazy times that we are enduring.

      Thanks for your gracious feedback.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 1 person

      • Gronda, is it my imagination or are we in the midst of one of the most extensive counter-intelligence operations in American history? This morning I woke up to a Politco poll that shows 68% of the voters think it’s appropriate to indict a sitting President.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. As far as I’m concerned, since he has been caught in this, as well as a number of lies where he definitely DID know that he was not telling the truth, I have decided never to believe another word that comes from his mouth. Once a liar, always a liar. I wash my hands of this person … now if only we could wash him out of the White House and the rest of the trash with him! (Yeah, I’m grumpy tonight 😉 )


    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Jill,

      You are right in thinking that every word that President Trump utters, has to be subject to scrutiny, as he is incapable of doing the right thing for the right reasons.

      Let’s pray that there is a big enough blue wave this November 2018 to where the democrats even win the majority of seats in the US Senate.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Aside from the legal issue of the lies themselves, there is a moral rot in such behavior that cannot be excused. It’s comical under the present fact circumstances that he continues to deny having an affair with Stormy and the Playboy Bunny

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Usfman,

      He is going to be going down in the history books as the worst president in US history ever. It is going to take years to fix a lot of the damage that he has unleashed on this country.

      Then there will have to be a consensus developed as to how to prevent a repeat of an incompetent bully being elected US president and the scourge of dark monies on our body politics.

      I keep thinking that President Trump s simply the visible symptom of something that is a lot more sinister that needs to be faced.

      Hugs, Gronda


Comments are closed.