What’s The Real Reason US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Is Avoiding The -I-Word

Image result for cartoons GOP ON IMPEACHMENT

In a previous post I shared my theory of why the Democratic Party US House Speaker Pelosi has been resisting honoring the House’s constitutionally mandated directive, to commence an impeachment inquiry against the republican President Donald Trump for his numerous crimes, as detailed in the FBI’s 3/22/2019 final report regarding its Trump-Russia probe led by the Special Counsel Robert Mueller III.

Based on the FBI’s Mueller report, over 1000 federal prosecutors on a bi-partisan basis, have signed a public declaration during June 2019, explaining to the public, that if Donald Trump weren’t president, he would’ve been criminally indicted. There’s s Department of Justice rule which blocks a US sitting president from being criminally indicted. As of 2019-2020, there’s only one government entity which has been granted the power by the US Constitution to hold President Trump accountable for his felonious acts and It’s the US House of Representatives.

See: lawfareblog.com/ Full Text of the Mueller Report’s Executive Summaries…

Related image

Now, it seems that others are on the same page regarding my theory. On June 18, 2019, the Bulwark published a similar theory.

My version of Speaker Pelosi’s point of view…

See: Speaker Pelosi Has To Start An House Impeachment Inquiry No Later Than September 2019

See: Democrat Rep. Katie Porter Who Has Been Taking Washington D.C. By Storm, Now Favors I Word

Image result for MEME US ELECTIONS LAW AGAINST ACCEPTING HELP FROM FOREIGN GOVERNMENT

Here’s the rest of the story…

On June 19, 2019, Philip Rotner of the Bulwark penned the following report, “How to Impeach Donald Trump” (“The Republican Senate won’t do it. The Democratic House won’t do it. But there is a way, if Nancy Pelosi wants to do it.”)

Excerpts:

“Why is Nancy Pelosi slow-walking impeachment?”

“Is it because she thinks impeachment would be too divisive? That there’s insufficient public support? That the virtual guarantee that the Republican Senate would not convict makes it a lost cause not worth pursuing?”

Image result for PHOTOS OF MANU RAJU PELOSI

“These are the obvious considerations and certainly all of them are at play in her thinking. But there’s another consideration which seems to have escaped the notice of most observers.”

“It’s the House.”

“You don’t have to be the speaker to know that the votes aren’t there. Just take a look at the New York Times’running total on where House Democrats stand on impeachment: There are 235 Democrats in the House, more than enough to impeach if all of them were on board. But they aren’t.”

Image result for cartoons of nancy pelosi

“Just over 60 (65) of the 235 unequivocally support launching an impeachment inquiry. Approximately twice that number are either against or undecided. Another 100 or so have ducked responding to the Times inquiry.”

“Which means that if only 18 of the publicly undecided Democrats (or of the 100 Democrats who haven’t yet weighed in) were to vote against impeachment, it would fail.”

“Many of the House Democrats who already oppose impeachment are from swing districts that handed Congress to the Democrats in the 2018 election. They won because they carefully avoided making their campaigns about Trump, focusing instead on issues such as healthcare and education. They can’t be counted on to vote for impeachment. It’s not hard to imagine that if put to a choice, enough of them would vote no to kill any chance of winning an impeachment vote in the House.”
                                                                    ****
Image result for cartoons of pelosi

“And that would be a disaster.”

“A failed impeachment vote in the Democratic House would be far worse than a failed conviction in the Republican Senate.”

“Which means that it’s not just a Senate vote that needs to be avoided. It’s a House vote.”

“I suspect that the prospect of losing a vote in the House is precisely what is behind Nancy Pelosi’s slow-walk on impeachment. Nobody is better at counting votes than Pelosi. Nobody is more pragmatic than Pelosi. She’s not going to lead her caucus off a cliff.”

“But avoiding an impeachment vote doesn’t necessarily require avoiding an impeachment inquiry.”

Related image
SPEAKER PELOSI

“So why is Pelosi opposed even to that?”

“I suspect that the answer for the pragmatic Pelosi has more to do with timing than anything.”

“It’s too soon.”

“How long can House Democrats string along an impeachment inquiry that by necessity can’t end in an actual vote? How long until the public gets sick of it, and turns on the Democrats for running a pointless, never-ending political show? Right now the election is almost a year and a half away. That’s too long.”

JUDICIARY COMMITTEE

“The alternative is to run a stealthy, undeclared impeachment process. Call it an investigation, call it oversight, call it anything you want—but don’t call it impeachment. In fact, make a big show of being against impeachment because it’d be so divisive, and such an obstacle to the House doing its real job of work for the American people. And while you’re doing that, call witnesses, force Trump to stonewall, and win one court battle after another.”

Then wait until the presidential campaign is in full swing—when it’s too late to get to an impeachment vote—and announce that the president has left you no choice but to start a formal impeachment inquiry: We might not be able to remove, or even impeach him, but we owe a duty to the Constitution and to future generations not to turn a blind eye to his misconduct.

“Never finish.”

“Right up to the election.”

3 comments

  1. Sigh. Rule of law in the United States is, for all intents and purposes, dead. If Trump is above the law, and he obviously is, then there can be no law. If I were to be pulled over for speeding tomorrow, I would laugh in the officer’s face and drive off, for if Trump cannot be forced to follow the law, then neither can I. I’m sick and tired of it all. As far as I can see, there is but one way to remove this man and restore some semblance of order to this nation before he is give the chance to start World War III in the Middle East, and I hope somebody heeds the call soon.
    Hugs.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Gronda, I received one of those fundraising envelopes from the RNC which summarizes how it is this evil Democrats who are causing all of these problems. I sent them another note highlighting the position of Republicans for the Rule of Law, reinforcing the courage and merit of GOP Congressman Justin Amash and concluding with the 1,000+ former federal prosecutors who feel obstruction occurred and the president needs to be held accountable.

    This is not just a Democrat or Republican issue, it is an American one. When will the GOP act? What else do they need to see? The US president is a “clear and present danger” to our democracy, our planet and the GOP. I do not say this lightly or without study. We are a Republic, not a kinddom.

    Keith

    Liked by 3 people

  3. Hello Gronda. I think there has been a slight misreading of the uncommitted or independent voters. I think there are basically three types of voters. Those who will vote for tRump no matter what, the cult of tRump. Those so turned off by what he has done they will never vote for him, the democrats. The last group is the ones on the fence about if they will vote for tRump or not. Well let’s talk about that group. See I don’t think it is so cut and dried. I think they may not vote for a Democrat but also won’t vote for tRump anyway, they will simply not vote. If that happens the Democrats still win. I doubt their willingness to vote for or against tRump ahs much to do with impeachment. I think they need to be given a reason to simply come out and vote for the democrats. Look these Democrats that won in swing districts, and some in even red districts, did not win because the people loved Democrats. They won because those people were turned off by tRump. Now regardless of what the Democrats do tRump is not going to improve or grow on them, so they still won’t vote for him. They won’t like him anymore in the future than they already do now. So the Democrats won’t lose support by not showing the criminal actions of tRump but they will lose support if they do not try to hold tRump accountable as they promised to do in 2018. Hugs

    Liked by 1 person

Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.