aside Here’s The Skinny On The Latest Senate’s Trumpcare 3.0 (BCRA) Bill

Image result for photos of senators rolling out BCRA BILL

On July 14, 2017, “We the People are stuck again waiting and hoping that the Senate’s latest attempt to repeal and replace the 2010 Obamacare Act will fail again.

But we who are part of resisting this atrocity need to be contacting our US Senators by any means possible for the week of July 17, 2017.

Image result for PHOTO OF SENATORS ON FENCE BCRAAs of July 14, 2017 there are only two definite NO votes. Maine Sen. Senators Susan Collins and Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul both said they intend to vote against the bill. With two NO votes, Vice President Mike Pence would be the one to provide the 51st vote needed for passage. With two NO votes this bill will pass. But if three Republican senators defect, the bill cannot even get to the Senate floor for debate.

Image result for photos of senators rolling out BCRA BILLWe need 1 more republican senator to break with his/ her party by publicly denouncing this bill.

The main US Senate phone line 202-225-3121 (202-224-3121) or  YOU CAN FIND PHONE NUMBERS FOR EVERY SENATOR HERE. or U.S. Senate: Senators of the 115th CongressImage result for PHOTO OF SENATORS ON FENCE BCRA

Image result for photos of senators on rollout of latest healthcare billThe reason why even health care insurance companies are strenuously objecting to this latest version, Trumpcare 3.0, (BCRA) is that the Senators Ted Cruz and Mike Lee’s amendment added to this latest proposal is counter to the most basic insurance principles, like the law of “large numbers.” By cutting out the healthy younger population with the Cruz/ Lee plan with the availablity of cheaper stripped down or “skinny policies,” the less healthy folks will end up paying much more for the regulated Obamacare policies with huge deductibles and copays, and thereby, guaranteeing its “death spiral” or failure. The Obamacare policies will become so expensive that peoples will not be able to afford them and then and then they’ll drop off the insurance rolls. The guarantee of coverage with pre-existing conditions will be in jeopardy. This bill is arguably the worst of the 3 Senate’s healthcare plans.

Image result for photos of senators rolling out BCRA BILL

Here’s the rest of the story…

On July 14, 2017, Danielle Kurtzleben of NPR penned the following report, “Senate Health Care Bill Revisions Released In Attempt To Appease GOP Critics.”

The new bill makes some big changes from the last BCRA draft, but it also leaves some major parts of the original Senate proposal intact — it would still repeal the individual and employer mandates, it would still mean cuts to Medicaid spending, and it would still allow states to opt out of key parts of Obamacare.”

“In their summary of the bill, Senate Republicans laid out the major provisions. Here are some of those big changes that this new version of the bill would make to the original BCRA, and what they would mean:

“Health savings accounts will be able to pay for premiums. Under IRS rules, people with high-deductible plans are eligible for health savings accounts (HSAs), accounts into which people can put money for health care expenses tax-free. Under this bill, people would for the first time be able to use that money for premiums. Americans’ deposits in HSAs have ballooned over the last decade, according to HSA consulting firm Devenir. However, those accounts also tend to benefit higher-income people more than others, as Kaiser Health News’ Michelle Andrews wrote in December — for example, richer people are more likely to have the extra money to sock away for health expenses.”

“More money for the opioid epidemic. The Senate’s initial bill offered $2 billion to address the opioid crisis for 2018. This version would offer about $45 billion over 10 years, which is what Republicans Ohio GOP Sen. Rob Portman and West Virginia Sen. Shelley Moore Capito had requested at one point. However, some experts say that around $4.5 billion a year is nowhere near enough for combating America’s massive opioid epidemic, as the New York Times reported in June.”

Image result for photos of senators rolling out BCRA BILL“Keeping some Obamacare taxes. The first BCRA version would have repealed an array of Affordable Care Act taxes, which would have overwhelmingly benefited higher-income Americans. This newer version of the bill keeps some in place, including the net investment income tax and a payroll tax that hit higher-income Americans.”

“Allowing insurers to offer non-Obamacare-qualified plans. This mirrors an idea that Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and Utah Sen. Mike Lee had proposed in recent weeks: The Senate’s bill would allow an insurer to offer skimpier plans. As long as an insurer does offer a plan on the individual insurance exchanges that meets the demands of Obamacare’s Title I (for example, covering certain areas like preventive care and protecting people with pre-existing conditions), that insurer will be allowed to offer additional plans off of the individual insurance exchanges that don’t meet those criteria.”

“That idea had created worries of a two-tiered insurance system — one in which older and sicker people would opt into the more comprehensive plans, while younger and healthier people would choose the cheaper plans that covered less, potentially causing a “death spiral” on the exchanges for those older and sicker people.”Bob Englehart / Cagle Cartoons

Editorial cartoon on Paul Ryan and Republicans and health care“Extra stabilization money, in part for high-risk customers. The original version of the BCRA provided $112 billion that would have allowed states to stabilize their markets or help high-risk customers in a wide variety of ways. In this version, that is bumped up to $182 billion. One function of this money is to mitigate some of the two-tier issues created by new, nonqualified plans. If an insurer offers a plan that meets the Obamacare criteria, that insurer would be eligible for money to help high-risk customers.”

This all means that the new version doesn’t make major changes to one big part of the BCRA: Medicaid. Under the original Senate bill, the Obamacare Medicaid expansion would be rolled back, and Medicaid spending would be capped — states would either be allotted a certain amount per capita, or they could get a block grant.”. It also caps Medicaid spending growth in the medium-to-long-term. This bill doesn’t change any of that.

Steve Sack / Minneapolis Star Tribune“According to the CBO, the original BCRA would have cut Medicaid spending by $772 billion over 10 years, and would have resulted in 15 million fewer Medicaid enrollees by 2026 than under current law.”

“A new CBO score on the bill is expected Monday or Tuesday (July 18). By the end of next week, there is likely to be a key procedural vote. That would put things on track for a final vote the following week.”

“Meanwhile, Republicans Bill Cassidy of Louisiana and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina released an alternative plan Thursday morning.”

This blog was updated on 7/14/17.

Related Articles:

PDF]Risk Pooling: How Health Insurance in the Individual Market Works (Explains Why Cruz amendment doesn’t work.)


  1. Gronda, thanks for rallying people. If this bill passes, is reconciled with the House (the President forgets this step) biill or adopted by the House and signed by the President, it will harm many millions and the Republican Party. It is not a well conceived change as it hurts so many.

    I left a couple of messages for the senators of my state. It troubles me that they are taking messages and not taking calls. But, please fill the boxes up with messages. Keith

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Keith,

      Thanks for making the calls. Some of our senators go into hiding when too many calls start rolling in, and that’s when the message machine gets turned on. I just added a PDF from which explains why the Cruz amendment doesn’t work.

      Hugs, Gronda


      • Gronda, there is little public case to be made for this bill which is why it is done in secret. We have a poverty problem in America and the Republican answer is to kick people off Medicaid. And, this will hurt rural America in a big way, which are largely Republican voters. Keith

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Dear Keith,

    I am praying that there is one brave republican who steps forward to do what they know is the right thing to do. The last time it was Sen. Dean Heller last time but these super pacs funded by republican big monies immediately paid for TV ADs to be run against him. If I were him this would be pay back time to send a return message.

    Hugs, Gronda


    • Gronda, the irony is if these TV ads are successful and this bill passes and becomes law, it will be very damaging to the Republican Party. Passing an unpopular bill that makes matters far worse and hurts the economy, especially in rural areas, is not a good legislative strategy.


      Liked by 1 person

  3. Dear !EarthUnited,

    This has been one of my complaints of the democratic party. With the various programs, there needs to be more diligence in reviewing laws, as to its efficacy with periodic audits and steps taken to mitigate the chances of fraud, corruption and unfairness. There is always the possibility of unintended consequences. This would be easier to accomplish if the democrat and republican legislators were better able to work with the other side in a constructive manner.

    Thanks for the reference.

    Hugs, Gronda


    • Dear Suzanne,

      This is literally the worst of the 3 republican healthcare plans. I am praying that CBO numbers which are expected before July 19, will reflect this.

      Again, thanks a million times over for your support and for this reblog.


Comments are closed.