aside President Plans To Sign Bill Baring The Lifting Of Russian Sanctions

Image result for photos of congress working on russian sanctions bill

UPDATE: As per a 7/28/17 Washington Post report, “The bill passed by Congress would increase sanctions against Russia, Iran and North Korea. A 98-to-2 vote by the Senate on Thursday had set up the president with a pivotal choice: Veto the bill knowing that lawmakers are prepared to override his veto, or sign the legislation that binds his hands when it comes to altering sanctions policy against Moscow, a provision his administration lobbied hard against.”

On July 25, 2017 US House Congressional representatives passed the bill barring the president from unilaterally lifting Russian sanctions with an overwhelming bipartisan number of votes (419-1) .

Here’s the rest of the story… 

On July 25, 2017, Mike DeBonis and Karoun Demirjian of the Washington Post penned the following report, “House passes Russia sanctions bill, setting up veto dilemma for Trump.”


“The House on Tuesday (7/25/17) voted overwhelmingly to advance new financial sanctions against key U.S. adversaries and deliver a foreign-policy brushback to President Trump by limiting his ability to waive many of them.”

“Included in the package, which passed 419 to 3, are new measures targeting key Russian officials in retaliation for that country’s alleged interference in the 2016 presidential election, as well as sanctions against Iran and North Korea in response to those nations’ weapons programs.”


“Members of the Trump administration, including Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, have resisted the congressional push — in particular a provision attached to the Russian measures that would require Congress to sign off on any move to relieve those sanctions.”

“The legislation was revised last week to address some administration concerns, including its potential effect on overseas oil-and-gas projects that include Russian partners. But the bill passed Tuesday retains the congressional review requirement.”

“These three regimes in different parts of the world are threatening vital U.S. interests, and they are destabilizing their neighbors,” House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Edward R. Royce (R-Calif.) said Tuesday. “It is well past time that we forcefully respond.”

Image result for photos of congress working on russian sanctions bill“White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders declined to say Monday (7/24/17)  whether Trump would sign or veto the bill, adding that the president “has been very vocal about his support for continuing sanctions on those three countries.” The administration did not issue a formal statement laying out its position, as is customary for major bills.”

“He has no intention of getting rid of them, but he wants to make sure we get the best deal for the American people possible,” Sanders said. “Congress does not have the best record on that … He’s going to study that legislation and see what the final product looks like.”

“But the administration’s posture toward Russia has emerged as one of the few areas where congressional Republicans have been willing to openly buck the White House’s wishes.An initial Senate bill targeting Iran and Russia passed in Juneon a vote of 98 to 2, with only Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) opposed.”

Image result for photos of congress working on russian sanctions bill

“That bill hit a procedural snag over claims that it ran afoul of the constitutional requirement that revenue bills originate in the House. The roadblock came as Trump administration officials stepped up a lobbying campaign against it, prompting Democrats to accuse House GOP leaders of stalling on Trump’s behalf.”

“New obstacles emerged earlier this month. House Democrats objected to Senate changes to the bill that could freeze out the House minority’s ability to block sanctions relief. The energy industry also raised concerns that U.S. companies could be frozen out of projects with Russian partners.”

Image result for photos of congress working on russian sanctions bill

“House leaders agreed to vote on an expanded version of the bill last week after adding sanctions aimed at freezing North Korea’s nuclear program and targeting banks that provide revenue to its government. The measures against Pyongyang, which passed the House 419 to 1 as a stand-alone bill in May, were inserted at the request of House Republican leaders.Democrats were more aggressive during floor debate Tuesday than Republicans in casting the bill — and its congressional review requirement — as a rebuke of Trump’s foreign policy.”

“This is critical at a moment when our allies are uncertain about where this administration stands with respect to Russian aggression,” said House Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.), who brokered a deal on the bill with GOP House leaders. He said that Congress could pursue additional sanctions targeting the Russian energy industry if Russian President Vladi­mir V. Putin and allies “fail to heed the message of this bill that their business as usual cannot and must not continue.”

“The House voted under special procedures for noncontroversial bills expected to pass with a two-thirds majority. The near-unanimity means the House could override a presidential veto.”

Image result for photos of congress working on russian sanctions bill

“The bill we just passed with overwhelming bipartisan support is one of the most expansive sanctions packages in history,” Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) said in a statement following the vote. “It tightens the screws on our most dangerous adversaries in order to keep Americans safe.”The Senate has not yet had the chance to vet the sanctions against Pyongyang, but Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told reporters Monday that he expects the House bill to pass the Senate, with “minor details” about procedure still to be worked out.

“Corker said he was exploring ways to ensure the bill would be sent to Trump before the end of the week, when House members are set to leave Washington for a five-week recess. “We’d like to get this thing passed and into law,” he said.”

“It seems we may be on the floor before we ironed out all the differences with the other body,” said Rep. Eliot L. Engel (D-N.Y.), the top Democrat on the Foreign Affairs panel, pointing to differences on the North Korean provisions. “I hope that’s not the case.”

Image result for photos of congress working on russian sanctions bill
“The version of the bill passed by the House Tuesday (7/25/17) addresses concerns about in which chamber the bill would originate, removes the provision that blacklists energy companies from entering into oil development projects if any Russian firm is involved, and delays defense and intelligence sector sanctions while asking the administration to clarify which Russian entities would fall within those sectors.”

“The bill also protects a 30-day window for Congress to take steps to block the president if he tries to roll back any sanctions imposed against Russia — signaling that lawmakers were unmoved by the Trump administration’s lobbying effort to get them to scale back the congressional review power in the bill.”

(Senator Schumer said) “Passing the bill on a bipartisan basis will send a strong signal to the White House that the Kremlin needs to be held accountable for meddling in last year’s election.”


  1. Dear Mz. Gronda,
    Well it appears as if Rex Tillerson has all but quit! He has announced he is taking time off. The tRump is pushing really hard on Sessions to resign, to stop the investigation of he and his family. It is looking more and more like a recess appointment and the firing of the SC. I honestly do not think the GOPTP congress will stand up to this tyrant. Please reassure me again that this will not happen…


    • Dear Crustyolemothman,

      Thanks for the info. I just blogged on the missing Rex Tillerson. So far, Mr. Sessions is not resigning and it looks like he is being backed by fellow republican senators and right wing pundits.

      He will not be seeing Jeff Sessions giving into his intimidation tactics anytime soon which means the president will have to fire him.

      Let’s wait and see.

      Hugs, Gronda


  2. Dear 1EarthUnited,

    I’m taking a wait and see attitude on this story. From what I read, there has been nothing determined about her laptop even if it is possession of law enforcement. It probably is the aide’s hard drives that is of interest to the FBI.

    Hugs, Gronda.


  3. As much as I question his own methods and am many, many miles from his beliefs I cannot help but wish that if the current republican set up were fated to win the 2016 presidential election the USA would be better off with President Ted Cruz; at least he is a professional.
    This crew are allegorical to the sickly heir to a medieval European throne, who has little chance or no chance of surviving, much less doing anything of worth.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Roger,

      Almost anyone would be better than President Trump but that would not be Senator Ted Cruz. He is despised by his colleagues.There is almost a whole book with jokes against him, written by Senator Al Franken.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 1 person

      • I heard that if someone shot him on the Senate floor, the police would be unable to find witnesses, but I didn’t know he was that bad! Worse than the oaf-in-residence?….Yeek!


Comments are closed.