aside Courts Block North Carolina’s Republicans From Rigging The 2018 Elections

Image result for photos of republicans at work in north carolina

Dear Republicans, It is It is time for your party to stop resorting to cheating and start campaigning on the merit of your ideas. You don’t deserve the win, if you have to win elections by resorting to dirty tricks like gerrymandering/ dividing voting areas in states to guarantee republicans a win. (See: This is the best explanation of gerrymandering you will ever see / Washington Post/ 2015.)

In the case of North Carolina, on January 9, 2018, the the District Courts blocked its officials from rigging by gerrymander tactics, the 2018 elections in their favor. However, the legislative leaders will probably appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Within the NC General Assembly, it was the Republican Sen. Ralph Hise, who along with Rep. David Lewis who led in these redistricting efforts.

Related image

Here’s the rest of the story… 

On January 9, 2018, Matthew Chapman of Shareblue Media penned the following report, “Federal court blocks North Carolina Republicans’ attempt to rig elections — again.”(The North Carolina GOP drew district lines to prevent the election of Democrats. A federal court just ruled they cannot use that map in 2018.”)


“For years, congressional elections in North Carolina have been completely noncompetitive. Republicans in the state legislature had rigged them with the most aggressive gerrymander in the country, packing Democrats together and spreading out Republicans to ensure the GOP would always win a majority of seats.”

The congressional district plan was enacted on Feb. 19, 2016. It was drawn in response to a ruling by the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. Photo courtesy of the N.C. General Assembly.

“But advocates of fair congressional representation won an enormous victory in the Tar Heel State on Tuesday (1/9/18).” 

“A district court sided with the League of Women Voters of North Carolina, who were represented by the Campaign Legal Center. In a 200-page ruling, the court found that the state’s congressional map is so partisan it violates the Constitution — and that a new, fair map must be drawn by Jan. 24.”

Image result for political cartoons about voting

“Depending on the exact district lines of the new map, this decision could result in Democrats gaining 2 to 5 new seats in the 2018 midterm elections.”

“The map that the court struck down was itself drawn up in 2016 by Republicans in the NC General Assembly, after another series of federal court rulings — which were upheld by the Supreme Court — found that the previous GOP-drawn map was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.”

House Chamber picture

“As the court opinion blisteringly points out, the second Republicans were told by the courts they could not pack voters in by race, they just openly switched to packing in voters by party:”

“Representative Lewis said that he “propose[d] that [the Committee] draw the maps to give a partisan advantage to 10 Republicans and 3 Democrats because [he] d[id] not believe it [would be] possible to draw a map with 11 Republicans and 2 Democrats.”

“Polls in NC show that even Republican voters think their legislature’s attempts to rig elections were too much.”

“All over the country, gerrymandering is being challenged. Virginia elected a Democratic governor who promised to veto any rigged map from Republican lawmakers. In Pennsylvania, the state courts are examining another such GOP scheme. And the Supreme Court is set to rule on a landmark case on the issue from Wisconsin.”

Image result for photos of REP david LEWIS OF NC

In the words of Rep. David R. Lewis of NC (Source: 1/9/18 News &Observer by Anne Blythe)

“The lawmakers, (Judge) Wynn wrote in the opinion for the majority, “do not dispute that the General Assembly intended for the 2016 Plan to favor supporters of Republican candidates and disfavor supporters of non-Republican candidates. Nor could they. The Republican-controlled NC General Assembly expressly directed the legislators and consultant responsible for drawing the 2016 Plan to rely on ‘political data’ — past election results specifying whether, and to what extent, particular voting districts had favored Republican or Democratic candidates, and therefore were likely to do so in the future — to draw a districting plan that would ensure Republican candidates would prevail in the vast majority of the state’s congressional districts.”

Senate Chamber picture“During the legislative session in which the maps were drawn, Rep. David Lewis, a Harnett County Republican who has shepherded the state’s recent redistricting efforts, announced that the maps were drawn to give Republicans a large majority. Lewis made his comments after the federal court found congressional districts drawn in 2011 to include unconstitutional racial gerrymanders. In announcing the new maps, Republican lawmakers stated that the race of voters would not be considered in the design of the new districts.”

“I propose that we draw the maps to give a partisan advantage to 10 Republicans and three Democrats because I do not believe it’s possible to draw a map with eleven Republicans and two Democrats,” Lewis said at the time.

“At the time, the courts had allowed for some partisan consideration in redistricting, which happens every 10 years after the census shows population shifts. But voting rights organizations have pushed for changes to that, saying modern map-making technology has allowed candidates for elected office to choose their voters under new redistricting plans instead of letting voters choose who represents them.”

Image result for photos of REP david LEWIS OF NC

“The comment by Lewis has provided the underpinnings for a lawsuit that sets North Carolina apart from other partisan gerrymander challenges. The Wisconsin case before the Supreme Court relies more heavily on a proposed statistical formula called “the efficiency gap,” which counts the number of votes wasted when voters are shifted into districts where their votes won’t matter, either because their party’s candidate can’t win or is already sure to win.”

“The North Carolina challengers argue, like the challengers in Wisconsin, that the maps drawn discriminate against Democratic candidates and voters because of their political beliefs. They say the lawmakers who either “packed” them into a single district or “cracked” their district into multiple districts to weaken their influence are robbing them of free speech and equal protection rights because their opinions differ from the lawmakers in power.”

Image result for photos of REP david LEWIS OF NC

“Republicans contend that such arguments and formulas are not for the courts to decide – that redistricting is a legislative duty in North Carolina.”

“The lawmakers, (Judge) Wynn wrote, “do not argue – and have never argued – that the 2016 Plan’s intentional disfavoring of supporters of non-Republican candidates advances any democratic, constitutional, or public interest. Nor could they. Neither the Supreme Court nor any lower court has recognized any such interest furthered by partisan gerrymandering – ‘the drawing of legislative district lines to subordinate adherents of one political party and entrench a rival party in power.’”

Link to entire report: NC gerrymandering: Congressional maps thrown out


  1. About rigging elections, here’s a fascinating documentary about Trump stealing the election and how he did it:
    Trumping Democracy.

    “Donald Trump won by three states, a victory engineered by ultra-conservative billionaire Robert Mercer, who bought Breitbart News and inserted Steve Bannon into the campaign. Another Mercer company, Cambridge Analytica, acquired data on millions of Americans and micro-targeted by zip code, those voters most likely to swing for Trump. In the last days of the campaign, they bought Facebook “dark posts,” deploying manipulative ads seen only by the user, before disappearing.”

    I’m streaming the video to watch, will report soon! Cheers Gronda.


    • Dear !EarthUnited,

      Thanks for this information. This Cambridge Analytica has been an entity of interest in the FBI’s Trump/ Russian probe. FBI’s Special Counsel Robert Mueller has requested that Cambridge Analytica turn over internal documents as part of its investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election.

      That doesn’t mean that there was a connection but that possibility is being checked out by the FBI.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 1 person

      • I found the video very insight, how targeted and manipulated the alt-right movement has been by Cambridge Analytica, and it’s all done on the subconscious level, with no traces to track or investigate afterwards. The documentary explains very well the whole process in detail.

        If your readers are interested, I uploaded the whole video here:



    • Dear Suzanne,

      The republicans must have figured out that they can’t win in the competition of ideas and policies and so they have to resort to cheating.

      Thanks a million times over for all your support and for this reblog.

      Hugs, Gronda


  2. Well, there we go. In the USA you have the Executive, The Legislative and the Judiciary and even the most astute, gifted and hardworking president was never able to control all of it.
    Of course it’s built into the USA system that anyone can get to be president, but it takes skill, maturity and experience to be useful in the post. He hasn’t even managed 1 out of 3!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Roger,

      The president’s power is about to be greatly diminished once Democrats take over the majority of seats in the US Congress. The judicial system is still a check on the president’s overreach of power.

      Meanwhile the FBI’s Special Counsel Mueller has just hired the premiere expert on cyber-security, the man who put Gucifer 1 behind bars. This tells me that the investigation is not winding down anytime soon.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Gronda, being in NC, I have shared how I reached out to legislators before our Voter ID Law was passed. I shared that it was unconstitutional and Jim Crow-like and was eventually ruled as such by the courts. The legislator you highlight in this post sent me two emails a ripped me a new one. I kept my response cordial, but after the second one said in my response, “I am a 55 year-old white man and former Republican. You and I both know what this law is all about.

    The gerrymandering continues to be ruled unconstitutional and this one more instance. Today, our US Congressman said this was an attempt to make things unfair by the Democrats and courts because the Democrats could not win an election. Really? This was a clear GOP hit job to cheat. Dems have cheated in the past when they had control of the General Assembly, but this is surgical and shameless.

    We must move away from partisan district making because of people like the legislators who did this. Keith

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Keith,

      If I had my way, in each state, I would create a non partisan panel of registered democrats, republicans and independents to be party to drawing districting maps that would best reflect the will of the people.

      Democrats have been guilty if gerrymandering as well but just not so blatantly obvious.

      The republicans will have to adapt to the reality that their days of prevailing and winning in the future with the changing demographics or it will go the way of the dinosaurs.

      Hugs, Gronda


      • Agreed. Legislation that continually leaves young folks holding the bag and infringes on civil liberties do not curry favor. I look back at the 2016 election and Rubio threw away his advantage trying to be Trump like rather than being the future of the party.

        Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.