aside How Not Increasing Immigration Influences the Stock Market’s Volatility/ Downturn

Rick McKee / Augusta Chronicle

The republicans in the White House and the US Congress have been enjoying the high of having passed their tax cuts bill in December 2017. They were warned by numerous economists about why they should be careful about over stimulating an economy that was already experiencing soaring stock market prices, with the last 3 quarters of 2017 GDP growth at about 3%, and almost full employment, but they couldn’t resist the temptation to tempt fate. In addition, these supposed republican deficit hawks paid for these tax cuts by increasing the US deficit over the next decade by anywhere from $1 trillion dollars to 1.7 trillion dollars, depending on which expert is crunching the numbers.

During the week of February 5, 2018, it is no surprise that the stock market has shown a correction of about 10%. Now it is very unlikely that for 2018, the US GDP  will reach a growth rate close to 3%.(SeeUnited States GDP Growth Rate – Forecast – Trading Economics)

Pat Bagley / Salt Lake Tribune

What happens if the rosy deficit forecasts from this tax bill prove to be inaccurate, and the economy does not grow as fast as Republican leaders have been fantasizing about, which ranges from (over 3%-4%), then what do they think is going to happen to the economy?Where are the brakes?

But these republicans are about to add another damper to the health of the US economy. As the unemployment numbers trend downward to full employment, businesses will need an influx of new workers that will not be available because republicans are dragging their feet in addressing the DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals ) where deportation is ended for 700,000 + young peoples who came to the USA as children of undocumented parents but who know no other country; and then they are actually seriously considering the cutting back of legal immigration by 50%. This short-sightedness could cost them the benefits of their 2017 tax cuts that they fought so hard for this past year.

John Darkow / Columbia Daily Tribune

Here is the rest of the story…

On February 5, 2018, Paul J. Lim of Time penned the following report,”Why the Stock Market Is Crashing Now, and What You Should Do About It”


So why is the stock market suddenly starting to plunge?

Chalk this up to a case of “be careful what you wish for.”

“On paper, Wall Street should be rejoicing right now — not racing to cash out as investors have been doing lately.”

“Investors, after all, recently got the corporate and income tax cuts they’ve been clamoring for. The economy is accelerating for real, with U.S. gross domestic product now expanding at a annual pace of more than 3% (after inflation) for three straight quarters.”

Dave Granlund /

“And for the first time in a long while, it appears that worker wages are finally beginning to lift, with average hourly earnings rising to $26.74 in January — a 2.9% increase over the past year.”

“This represents the fastest rate of wage growth in nearly nine years, since the end of the Great Recession. And it effectively marks the end of the global economy’s war against deflation, which had been the biggest economic threat since the financial crisis began more than a decade ago.”

“In theory, these are all bullish developments. Yet stocks are going in the opposite direction.”

“That’s largely because the natural outgrowth of an expanding economy and rising wages is inflation, which hasn’t been a real threat to the economy in nearly three decades.”

Image result for cartoons on income inequality

Is inflation really heating up?

Yes. Even though it seems tame right now — the consumer price index is up a modest 2.1% over the past 12 months — there’s a good chance inflation could start to pick up steam.

Why? For starters, “signs indicate that wage growth is headed even higher later this year,” says Brad McMillan, chief investment officer for Commonwealth Financial Network.”

“For example, the labor force participation rate — which measures the percentage of the working-age population that is employed or looking for work — “seems to have hit an upper bound at around 63% and has been bouncing around somewhat below that,” McMillan notes. Even with wages and job creation accelerating, January’s labor participation rate was 62.7%, which is about where it’s been for four straight months.”

Image result for cartoons on income inequality

“That, in turn, could mean that corporate profit margins are about to be pinched.”

“There’s one other reason why investors should brace themselves for higher inflation.”

“Jim Paulsen, chief investment strategist for The Leuthold Group, notes that for the first time in this economic recovery, nomimal GDP growth (that is, economic growth before the effects of inflation are stripped out) exceeds the national unemployment rate.”

“When the that happens, “history suggests wage pressures are finally likely to intensify more than most anticipate this year,” Paulsen says.”

Are there other reasons to worry?

“Yes. It’s not just the threat of rising inflation that investors fear. Wall Street is also worried about what the Federal Reserve might do in response.”

“The catalyst isn’t fear of a growth slowdown; it is fear of too much growth and surging bond yields,” says Jeffrey Kleintop, chief global investment strategist for Charles Schwab. “An overheating global economy could mean a more rapid shift by central banks to rein in stimulus” — typically by raising interest rates rapidly.”

“And rapid rate hikes in an overheating economy is “often a precursor to a recession and a bear market,” he notes.”

 “Already, in anticipation of higher short-term rates, investors have driven longer-term interest rates higher. Yields on 10-year Treasury notes, for instance, reached as high as 2.86% on Monday, up from 2.40% at the start of the year and 2.03% in September.”

Does the new Fed chief have anything to do with the sell-off?

“It’s hard to blame any of this on new Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell. After all, he was just sworn in as chairman of the U.S. central bank on Monday afternoon. And the sell-off began well in advance.”

“However, the markets have historically had a knack for testing new Fed chairman at critical junctures of the economy.”

“Investors will recall that Alan Greenspan became Fed chairman in August 1987, as the central bank was already hiking rates toward the end of a long economic expansion. That transition took place just weeks before the October 1987 market crash, in which stocks lost nearly a quarter of their value on a single day.”

“Ben Bernanke similarly assumed the Fed chairmanship in 2006, at the end of another cycle in which housing and stock prices were greatly inflated. About a year later, the stock market entered into a bear market in which equities lost more than half their value.”


    • Dear John Fioravanti,

      What’s troubling is that I took Economics 101 in college around 1970 but I appear to know more than some of our representatives in the US Congress which is definitely not a lot.

      These republicans could have crafted a tax reform bill that would have included a reduction in corporate tax rates without costing 1.5 trillion dollars over a decade, of which most of this will be added to the US deficit.

      These same republicans screamed bloody murder when President Obama wanted to pass a less expensive bill to stimulate the economy when it was struggling. In late 2017, the republicans did what would be considered a law which if enacted would stimulate the economy at a time when it was doing well. They obviously didn’t care about adding to the US deficit as long as the monies spent to where they wanted it to go, for the very rich and corporations.

      They are looking to cut back on immigration at a time when they should be increasing it to have a real chance to salvage the mess they made.

      Their “trickle down economics” plan was tried in 2 states in recent years, Kansas and Oklahoma which ended up disastrously. What these guys and gals don’t get, is that when taxes are reduced, there cannot be a corresponding increase in spending.

      The irony is that because these guys and gals threw caution to the wind and didn’t listen to their own economists, they will end up hurting the pocketbooks of the very folks, they wanted to help.

      They need to be able to sell the booming economy when some republicans run for re-election in the 2018 November elections but the economy may very well not be booming.

      The caveat is that I could always be wrong but I don’t think so.

      They may very well have shot themselves in the foot.

      Hugs, Gronda


      • I agree, Gronda, these guys shoot themselves in the foot every day – following the example of their adored leader in the White House.

        Liked by 1 person

  1. Dear 1EarthUnited,

    I cannot take Breibart’s ‘commentary on anything regarding immigration at face value, as this is a media outlet that is decidedly anti-immigration.
    Breibart can’t even get its facts right. As per the LA Times, “But lawmakers did so by raising spending caps on military and non-defense programs that will add $300 billion to $400 billion to the deficit.

    The reality is that if the republicans don’t want the Us economy to go south, there needs to be a major increase in legal immigration which includes making legal the DACA dreamers who are all young and who will be in the US workforce for years to come.

    Hugs, Gronda


  2. Gronda, well done. Two comments. 1) Immigration is accretive to the economy. 2) Innovation is portable. Folks coming to the US tend to be either better educated, entrepreneurial and/ or harder working than the average American, even from these so called “sh**hole” countries, per a less than judicious person.

    If we restrict immigration, it will be a headwind to our economy. Keith

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.