aside President Created Immigration Crisis Where It Didn’t Exist, So He Could Look Tough For Supporters

Image result for photos of trump when he announces candidacy

The republican President Donald Trump started off his campaign preying on peoples fears and insecurities on the immigration issue. He called peoples from Mexico, rapists and criminals. Later he was equating migrants seeking asylum at the southwest border with MS-13 gangs even though nothing could be further from the truth.

Those who fret over the diversification of the US culture with peoples of different colors, religions, nationalities, belief systems have been drawn to the pied piper of Donald Trump.

Most of us celebrate this diversity, recognizing that this hodgepodge of peoples from all over the world is what makes America truly great, but there is that minority of folks who face this changing world with trepidation and who are too easily persuaded by someone who promises to be their champion, to fight with every strength of his being against this changing tide.

Image result for photos of trump when he announces candidacy


There are numerous credible studies proving that the percentage of immigrants who become criminals is much less than that of the already existing population. This is also a fact that those in the immigrant community access government programs much less than American citizens.

See: President Is Basing Immigration Policy Decisions On His Racist Bias/ Grondamorin 

The President’s new immigration protocol, based on the myth that there was an immigration crisis, was enacted on April 6, 2018, but the president was forced to end parts of it on the 20th of June 2018, due to public outrage. Still, the president needed a way to show his anti-immigration base of supporters that he was being tough on this issue.

The new immigration policy  was started with President Donald Trump’s Attorney General Jeff Sessions on April 6, 2018, with his  memo, 

These new immigration procedures allowed for the automatic separation of children from parents who were seeking asylum at the southwest US border. The president’s cabinet members and spokespeople were announcing that if refugees did not enter at designated US points of entry, there was the -0- tolerance rule in play, where every parent would be detained and prosecuted for a misdemeanor. It was at this point that the children were forcibly separated from their Moms and Dads for indeterminate periods of time.

As per Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), the president could have ended this practice of separating children from the parents with one phone call at any time. Directing the migrants to apply for asylum at the US designated points of entry was not a realistic plan as most peoples were being turned away at these designated points. There are documented stories detailing how peoples had been waiting for weeks to gain entry as well as instances where children were still being forcibly separated from their parents, even at these US designated points of entry.

As per international law, it SHOULD NOT BE illegal for peoples fleeing danger, persecution, war like circumstances, to ask for asylum.


Here’s the rest of the story…

On June 22, 2018, Jennifer Rubin of the Washington Post penned the following report, “Trump created the immigration crisis out of sheer ignorance and cruelty”

“The Trump presidency is one of incomplete sentences, sneers and slogans: “Catch and release!” “Zero tolerance!” If you quizzed President Trump or many of his supporters, chances are that they’d be hard-pressed to explain what these things mean.”

Image result for photos of rallies against trump's immigration policies

“Catch and release” does not mean asylum-seekers are set loose, never to be heard from when their immigration hearing comes around. To the contrary, the alternatives to detention (ATD) programs in effect before Attorney General Jeff Sessions and senior adviser Stephen Miller decided it was a great idea to incarcerate those who committed the misdemeanor of entering without documentation were working extremely well.”

Alex Nowrasteh of the Cato Institute explains:

“ATDs usually take at least one of three forms. The first is electronic monitoring devices whereby migrants have to wear a tracking device like an ankle bracelet. The second is assigning caseworkers to periodically check up on the migrants. The third is monetary incentives, such as bonds. Many ATD programs mix these three. [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] runs the ATD program because they are responsible for apprehending, removing, and detaining immigrants inside of the United States. Detention costs about $170 per day for long stays and about $30 for short stays. The proposed tent cities to house migrant children would have cost about $775 per person per night. As far as I can tell, about 100 percent of them comply with court orders as they are in government detention and therefore have no choice. The tradeoff for this extra effectiveness are the various costs of detention.”

“Under the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program, for example, which used “electronic ankle monitors, telephone checkups that used biometric voice recognition software, unannounced home visits, employer verification, and in-person reporting to supervise participants,” 99.6 percent of the immigrants showed up for their hearings. The Family Case Management provides “caseworkers to help migrants meet their legal and judicial obligations, such as reporting to ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) check-ins, appearing at court hearings, and departing the United States when ordered by the courts.” Trump discontinued this program, although “100 percent made it to their court appearances, and only 2 percent absconded into the black market after receiving removal orders.” Groups such as the Catholic Church and the “”Lutheran Church run similar programs, with about a 97 percent appearance rate.”

“Trump’s insistence on locking up people fleeing their home countries was based on the notion that “catch and release” was a disaster. In fact, a variety of programs have been in place and could be expanded upon — ones that are, as Nowrasteh argues, “far cheaper, more humanitarian, and less of a political disaster for this administration” than incarcerating families is.”


“Trump’s hand may be forced by the courts since the Flores Settlement, which prevents migrant children from being held more than 20 days, remains in effect. If Trump cannot persuade courts to allow indefinite detention of families (and good luck with that), the administration might finally return to programs that work.”

Moreover, the notion that desperate families with little kids trek through the desert to get to the US so that they can go on a crime spree is preposterous to begin with. Here is what one study found looking at 10 cities with “the most refugees relative to the size of their population between 2006 and 2015”:

“Rather than crime increasing, nine out of 10 of the communities actually became considerably more safe, both in terms of their levels of violent and property crime. This included places like Southfield, Michigan, a community just outside of Detroit, where violent crime dropped by 77.1 percent. Decatur, Georgia, a community outside Atlanta, experienced a 62.2 percent decline in violent crime.”

Image result for photos of migrant children at detention centers

“The only place where crime went up was West Springfield, Mass., which was simultaneously hit by an opioid epidemic.”

“In short, refugees were not a risk to Americans’ safety to begin with. Before Trump came along, we had a system that cheaply and effectively monitored immigrants until their cases could be heard. It is almost as if Trump created a problem out of thin air by demonizing a group of people, then cruelly separating babies and toddlers from their families and ultimately deciding to lock up families indefinitely at enormous cost. Gosh, it sure looks like Trump is not out to solve a problem, but rather to stir up his low-information voters, whose xenophobia helped elect him.”

See: Boston Slashed Its Crime Rate Even In M13

Image result for cartoons on trump and immigration


  1. Gronda, the man oversimplifies causes of problems or makes them up. The impact on jobs in disenfranchised parts of America, is not only due to trade and immigration, it is primarily due to CEOs chasing cheap labor and technology gains. We do 4x the manufacturing we did in the 1980s with about 40% of the people. Yet, that is harder to put on a bumper sticker. Keith

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Keith,

      President Trump and his minions like Stephen Miller are the dumbest of the dumb. Their racism has gotten them into trouble with the travel bans against Muslim countries, another created crisis that didn’t exist.

      Then there is the president’s imposition of tariffs against those elite well educated leaders that he just hates where the trade problems / unfairness could have been handled over a dinner, instead of a trade war. But he lies about the levels of unfairness. Why? He needs to look strong, like he is doing something to impress the base.

      The latest is this immigration debacle where he had to make up a crisis that didn’t exist even if it meant the cavalier separation of families.

      This president is beyond evil.

      Hugs, Gronda


    • Dear Crustyolemothman,

      Thanks for the reference. This is a big deal because George Will is a well respected conservative. For him to push fellow republicans to NOT VOTE FOR GOP this upcoming November 2018 is a big deal.

      For anyone who is intellectually honest and decent, they should follow this direction. We need to take back our democracy.

      I may blog on this later. Thanks again!

      Hugs, Gronda


  2. Good piece, Gronda! So many lies he has created to suit his own nefarious purposes, so much cruelty and wickedness. And his ‘executive order’ did nothing to ensure that the 2,300+ children already separated from their parents would be reunited. The record-keeping has been so poor that the children cannot even be identified in many cases. As you said, America is made better by the diversity of people coming to this nation and those who feel threatened by this are the targets of Trump’s fear-mongering. Something must change and quickly, else we will be no better than a third-world country.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Jill,

      It has gotten so bad, you have to read the Washington Post op-ed piece by George Will thar Crusyolemothman referenced above.

      We have a true blue popular conservative asking fellow republicans NOT TO VOTE for the GOP this upcoming November 2018.

      The president and his administration has so mismanaged their immigration plans that I’m convinced that they didn’t bother to worry about how to reunite families that were separated. The president just wanted to look strong and tough to his base.

      He is the face of evil. His party is the republican party of racists.


      Liked by 1 person

      • George Will is indeed a man who follows his conscience, I believe. Good article. No, it would seem that there was not a whit’s worth of thought given to reuniting these children with their parents … just following Trump’s orders to create chaos, to draw attention at the cost of innocent children’s lives. And now? They do not know where which children are that match up to which children, but oh well … in the words of Melania, “good luck”. grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. Evil personified.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Suzanne,

      I used to always if what happened in Nazis Germany could happen again. I am no longer wondering. It is up to all of us to keep this evil from seeping in to our culture. President Trump is catering to people’s worst angels which is a form of evil.

      Thanks a million times over for your support and for this reblog.

      Hugs, Gronda


Comments are closed.