aside Dear Republicans, Your Dark Money Days Are About To Hit A Roadblock

Image result for photos of americans for prosperity

Could the Republican Party be in receipt for even more negative news? Yes, as many donors of dark monies, (monies they can donate for political purposes anonymously), will have the cloak of anonymity taken away. Again, the courts have stepped in to rule that many of these donors will have to reveal their names to the public, even before the November 2018 elections.

Here is the rest of the story… 

On September 18, 2018, Paul Blumenthal of HuffPost penned the following report, “Dark Money Groups Will Have To Disclose Their Donors In Time For The Midterms” (“A court order invalidating a rule that kept some election spending secret is going into effect.”)


“There may be a whole lot less dark money in federal elections after the Supreme Court allowed a lower court decision to go into effect on Tuesday invalidating a key regulation that created a loophole for undisclosed spending.”

Image result for photos of americans for prosperity

“The decision came about after Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a liberal watchdog group, fought for the past six years to get the Federal Election Commission to enforce campaign finance laws against Crossroads GPS, a conservative nonprofit group founded by Karl Rove, a senior adviser to George W. Bush when he was president. CREW finally won its battle on Tuesday.”

“As of Sept. 18, any group that runs an independent expenditure ― election ads that expressly call for the election or defeat of a candidate ― in excess of $250 will have to disclose all political donors above $200.”

The Capitol is seen at sunrise as Congress returns from the August recess to face work on immigration, the debt limit, funding the government, and help for victims of Hurricane Harvey, in Washington, Tuesday, Sept. 5, 2017. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

“This is a great day for transparency and democracy,” Noah Bookbinder, CREW’s executive director, said in a statement. “Three courts, including the Supreme Court, have now rejected Crossroads’ arguments for a stay, meaning we’re about to know a lot more about who is funding our elections.”

“The decision will have a major effect on the 2018 midterm elections, as dark money groups will now have to disclose contributors if they spend $250 or more to advocate for or against the election of a federal political candidate.”

Image result for photos of americans for prosperity

“Dark money spending exploded after the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision opened the door for corporations and unions to legally spend unlimited sums on elections as long as organizations remained independent from political parties and candidates’ campaigns. Dark money groups have already spent $65 million on the 2018 elections, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.”

“Before the ruling went into effect, the top dark money spenders included the Republican-aligned business lobby U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Democratic Party nonprofit Majority Forward and Charles and David Koch’s Americans for Prosperity. If these groups spend another dollar to call for the election or defeat of a federal candidate, they will be required to disclose all contributors above $200 to their political operations.”

Related image

“This is happening as a result of six years of litigation by CREW. The group filed a complaint with the FEC against Crossroads in 2012. The complaint alleged Crossroads broke election law by spending more than 50 percent of its funds on political campaigns while failing to disclose its donors.”

“CREW’s complaint relied on a Bloomberg report about a Crossroads fundraising event where Rove boasted to potential donors that a contributor had given $3 million to fund election ads to help Ohio Republican Senate candidate Josh Mandel’s 2012 campaign against Sen. Sherrod Brown (D). Federal election law requires the disclosure of donors who donate to outside groups like Crossroads for the express purpose of supporting or opposing a specific candidate. Crossroads did not disclose that or any other contributor.”

“An investigative report by the FEC general counsel found that Crossroads didn’t comply with certain campaign finance laws but also stated that the regulation mandating disclosure only when a donor explicitly gives money to fund ads in a particular race allowed the group to keep donors hidden. FEC commissioners split along ideological lines, 3-3, on whether Crossroads violated campaign finance rules and on whether to close the file on the group, effectively killing CREW’s complaint.”

“CREW filed a lawsuit in 2016 in response to this dismissal and challenged the underlying regulation that protected Crossroads and all other dark money groups from disclosing their donors.”

Image result for photos of District Court Judge Beryl A. Howell

“D.C. District Court Judge Beryl A. Howell ruled in favor of CREW and overturned the regulation that restricted donor disclosure on Aug. 3. She determined that the regulation at issue, “blatantly undercuts the congressional goal of fully disclosing the sources of money flowing into federal political campaigns.”

“Crossroads filed a motion with the D.C. Court of Appeals to prevent the decision from going into effect, pending appeal. The court denied Crossroads’ request on Sept. 15, but Chief Justice John Roberts quickly approved a temporary emergency motion to stop the decision. This decision by Roberts was likely to provide enough time for the full court to convene and discuss the matter. Finally, the court unanimously decided to deny Crossroads’ emergency motion to block the decision from going into effect on Tuesday.”

Image result for PHOTOS OF FEC Ellen Weintraub

“I’m pleased with the results,” Ellen Weintraub, a liberal FEC commissioner, told HuffPost.”

“Dark money groups will likely either stop spending money on the 2018 midterm elections to avoid having to disclose their donors or shift tactics.”

“The court ruling covered only independent expenditures — for ads or other efforts that call for the election or defeat of candidates. The ruling does not cover electioneering communications, better known as issue ads, which applies to spending by outside groups that stops short of calling for the election or defeat of a candidate. That could be an ad that names a candidate and says terrible things about the person but ends with a request for viewers to call the candidate’s office and say how they feel.”

“Still, this is a major disturbance for the 2018 campaign strategies of both political parties.”


  1. Reblogged this on Filosofa's Word and commented:
    In 2010, with the Citizens United decision that removed limits on how much money corporations could contribute to political campaigns, we saw the beginning of an era whereby wealthy corporations are pretty much able to buy elections. The ruling was the beginning of the end of election integrity. But this week, a small step was taken that may be a start toward returning a bit of integrity to the U.S. elections, and our friend Gronda has written an excellent, informative piece explaining it. Thank you, Gronda, for keeping us informed!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dear Jill,

      This news couldn’t have come at a better time before the 2018 November elections. The republican donor class folks are convinced they can buy this election but this is a time when the power of the vote can trump all their monies. Still it’s a good time to limit the monies they can spend.

      Thanks a million for all of your support and for this reblog.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Dear Dr. Dr Bramhall,

    Thanks for sharing this good news about the courts limiting the usage of dark monies in time for the upcoming Nov. 2018 elections with this rebog.

    Hugs, Gronda


Comments are closed.