This is a humdinger of a story about NC voting blatant illegalities. It seems that the exact same kind of irregularities having been popping up in the exact same counties in the Republican primary. Curious and curious er?
It seems that as of December 1, 2018, the North Carolina’s State Board of Elections refused to certify the election results from 11/6/18, in the 9th Congressional District where so far the Republican Party candidate Mark Harris has a 905 count in his favor over the Democratic Party contender Dan McCready.
It turns out that an investigation has been triggered into possible election fraud over voting irregularities and allegations of ballot tampering.
Voters around the district had been reporting about receiving absentee ballots that they neither requested or needed before the scheduled election day, on November 6, 2018. A number of voters had submitted statements under oath that some individuals — including at least one person with ties to the Harris campaign — came to their doors to collect absentee ballots, even ones that hadn’t been fully filled out.
Could it be that the Democratic Party will snatch its 41st US congressional seat from the Republican Party? Could this be the rampant voter fraud problem that the GOP keep touting? But it looks like it is the GOP folks who implemented a fraud on the voters of North Carolina.
Here is the rest of the story…
On December 1, 2018, Adam Peck of Think Progress penned the following report, “Officials investigate potential vote-rigging in North Carolina congressional election” (“Republicans are suddenly furious that a potential case of election fraud is being investigated.”
“”Next week will mark the midway point between Election Day on November 6 and the first day of the new Congress on January 3. Yet one congressional race in North Carolina remains undecided, and an ongoing investigation could leave the seat vacant for the foreseeable future.”
“As of Saturday 12/1/18), the margin in North Carolina’s 9th Congressional District stands at 905 votes in favor of Republican Mark Harris over Democrat Dan McCready. It’s a narrow margin, though hardly the narrowest of the 2018 midterm election season.”
“And yet, North Carolina’s State Board of Elections refused to certify the results during a meeting Friday afternoon, after voting anomalies and allegations of ballot tampering triggered an investigation into possible election fraud.”
“The problems began even before Election Day, when voters around the district began reporting they had received absentee ballots they neither requested nor needed. Others submitted statements under oath that some individuals — including at least one person with ties to the Harris campaign — came to their doors to collect absentee ballots, even ones that hadn’t been fully filled out.”
“One voter submitted a sworn affidavit saying an unidentified woman collected an incomplete absentee ballot and said she would finish filling it out. Filling out or turning in someone else’s absentee ballot is a federal crime.”
“Those reports jive with unexplained discrepancies in the results of absentee ballots. Bladen County saw an unusually high number of absentee ballots submitted for the midterm election, and certain precincts in both Bladen and neighboring Robeson counties had a curious number of absentee ballots that were requested but never submitted.”
“A local political science professor analyzed election data and found that the two counties accounted for nearly 18 percent of the state’s non-returned absentee ballots, despite being home to less than two percent of the state’s population.”
“What’s more, the discrepancies were similar to ones that plagued the Republican primary election in May. Harris ran against incumbent Rep. Robert Pittenger, and won by 828 votes. In Bladen County though, Harris captured an astounding 96 percent of the absentee ballots that were returned, far exceeding his margin in any other precinct. Roughly 22 percent of all GOP primary votes cast in Bladen County were absentee ballots, by far the highest rate in the district.”
“During Friday’s (11/30/18) meeting, the state Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement voted 7-2 in favor of holding an evidentiary hearing in mid-December to address these anomalies and plot a course of action. In the meantime, investigators are continuing to gather evidence that increasingly suggests fraud was a factor in both the general and Republican primary elections.”
“Harris’ campaign and the North Carolina GOP released statements blasting the state Board of Elections — an independent, bipartisan state agency — insisting that the results of the election be certified, while not disputing any of the allegations brought forward by voters in the district. Two of the board’s four Republicans voted in favor of the hearing, alongside all four Democrats and one nonpartisan member.”
“Ironically, the Republican party in the state is a vocal proponent of racist voter ID laws, insisting that the integrity of statewide elections must be safeguarded against the non-existent scourge of in-person voter fraud. When it comes to actual voter fraud though — at least when perpetrated on their behalf — integrity takes a back seat.”
Dan McCready’s campaign released a statement supporting the Board of Elections’ decision to delay the certification.
“Today’s news reports of the serious allegations in Bladen County are troubling,” his campaign said on Friday. “We cannot allow anyone to tamper with our elections or sabotage our electoral process. I stand with voters all across the 9th district in wanting to make sure any wrongdoing is investigated and prosecuted regardless of the outcome of the election.”
Reblogged this on Musings on Life & Experience and commented:
I hope they can get to the bottom of this. It’s terrible. 😦 — Suzanne
LikeLiked by 1 person
This is a horrible story. I’m just relieved enough that good people stepped forward to support an investigation into these allegations of voter fraud in NC.
Thanks a million for all your support and for this reblog.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Gronda, with the unconstitutional and highly restrictive voter ID law, one thing that was not included was absentee ballots. Voter fraud at the precinct is minuscule, yet where it occurs to a small extent is absentee ballots.
As a North Cariolinian who votes in this district, this type of cheating has appeared before in this district. The former Governor claimed a problem and newly elected (at this point) Mark Harris defeated an incumbent Comgressman in the primary.
We cannot tolerate cheating period. We must protect the integrity of the process regardless of who wins. And, the audit must be data driven and not politically driven. It should be noted the chair of the election commission in NC just resigned to make sure this recount does not appear political.
By the way, Harris is the candidate I spoke with outside my precinct, pleading with him to be bipartisan and collaborative and bring the negative tone down. Keith
LikeLiked by 3 people
If you have to cheat to win, you’ve lost. The GOP is getting out the message that they can’t win unless they cheat. At this point, they don’t deserve to win.
It is sad to know that a US Republican Party as an institution has been working for years to somehow suppress a good number of democratic voters with the voter ID laws.
I hope this story gets the coverage it deserves. It’s the GOP leaders and lawmakers who keep disseminating the ‘fake news’ that there is widespread individual voter fraud. Now we know it is because they are becoming experts at cheating, to where they are projecting that democrats are also resorting to these tactics.
This NC GOP Mark Harris has been very critical of NC election officials’ findings of probable voter fraud. He’s part of the problem. He deserves a loss.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Gronda, and Harris is a minister as well. How would Jesus feel about cheating to win? How would He feel about Harris’ blind support of a man like Trump? When Harris told me Trump was the most truthful President ever as he did what he said, my response was two fold. I don’t find that to be true and what if what he said he would do was based on a lie? Keith
LikeLiked by 2 people
Comments are closed.