aside How Montana Fought Back Dark Monies From Infecting its Politics

A fellow blogger Keith of Musingsofanoldfart.com reminded me of this story about Montana residents of both the Republican and Democratic Parties, standing up to the distributors of  dark monies” from being able to dictate the politics in their state.

This explains Democratic Senator Jon Tester winning his reelection in November 2018 even though the republican President Donald Trump had personally targeted him for extinction because he single-handedly managed to derail the White House’s Dr. Ronny Jackson from being successfully appointed as the head of the US Department of Veterans Affairs.

Its a good thing that Senator Tester is still in the US senate. As per the 12/12/18 Billings Gazette report, “U.S. Sen Jon Tester wrangled just enough votes Wednesday (12/12/18) to get Senate approval for his bill to turn back a new Internal Revenue Service practice allowing nonprofits to keep the names of major donors off their books.”

Tester
SEN. TESTER/ J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE, ASSOCIATED PRESS

“The Democratic senator from Montana, elected to this third term last month, was targeting an IRS policy shift favoring “dark money” groups. In July the IRS began advising nonprofit organizations that they no longer had to list the names of major donors — contributors of $5,000 or more — from disclosure filings.”

“Tester and other lawmakers who voted 50-49 to block the IRS, said that lack of disclosure was going to be a boon for a particular group of nonprofits that spend millions of dollars trying to shape public opinion on political issues, while stopping just shy of actually telling the electorate who to vote for.”

OpenSecrets.org

@OpenSecretsDC

The Senate voted today to overthrow a new Treasury Department policy that no longer requires some 501(c) tax-exempt nonprofits, including politically active groups, to disclose donor names and addresses to the IRS.http://crp.org/drkdrk by @annalecta & @KarlEvers1

Senate votes to prevent “dark money” from getting even darker

The US Senate voted to overthrow a new Treasury Department policy that no longer requires “dark money” groups to disclose donor names and addresses to the IRS.

opensecrets.org

Image result for PHOTOS OF SEN TESTER AND OTHER SENATORS FIGHTING DAR MONEY RULES
“Opposing lawmakers, all Republican, said the IRS had afforded major donors a right to privacy, with which Congress shouldn’t meddle.”

“Those election year ads that encourage voters to call an incumbent and tell them to vote no on a particular issue are typically paid for by nonprofit “social welfare” groups registered under the 501(c)(4) section of the federal tax code. And by sticking to an issue and not attacking a candidate outright, these groups avoid the stiffer reporting requirements of the Federal Election Commission.”

“Nonetheless, they’ve become a major source of election-year messaging and spending. In Montana’s 2018 Senate election, where spending reached a record $72 million, dark money groups on the left and right were big spenders.”

Image result for PHOTOS OF SEN TESTER AND OTHER SENATORS FIGHTING DAR MONEY RULES

“The risk of the government not knowing who contributes to these nonprofits is significant, Tester said, laying out a scenario in which foreign governments and nefarious actors could anonymously fund campaigns to influence public opinion.”

“When you don’t know who’s contributing the money, how do we know it’s not the Russians, that it’s not the Saudis, or other nations that are infiltrating our elections?” Tester said in a recorded Senate floor speech. “Our adversaries are always looking for the weakest link to try to destroy our country and destroy our democracy. Today, one of our weak links is our broken campaign finance system.”

Democratic Senator from Montana and ranking member of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs Jon Tester is followed by members of the news media at the Senate subway on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. on April 24, 2018. (Michael Reynolds / EPA-EFE /REX / Shutterstock)

Here’s the rest of the story…

On July 12, 2018, Ella Taylor of the NPR penned the following article, “Riveting Documentary Sheds Light On ‘Dark Money’ In Montana Politics”

Excerpts:

“In Dark Money, a documentary about invisible corporate shenanigans in her home state of Montana, director Kimberly Reed makes the incisive case that the latter threatens to sink our democracy outright.”

slider

“If 98 movie minutes about the subversion of campaign financing isn’t quite your idea of beating the summer heat, let me start by saying there’s not a dull or dry moment in Reed’s briskly paced film about the secret assault on the American electoral and judicial process by corporations whose agenda is nothing less than the dismantling of government itself. Dark Money tells a hair-raisingly specific American tale of illicit power. In other words, the stuff of thrillers since Hollywood time began — except that in this muckraking expose, the graft was real. Mercifully, so was the pushback from a citizenry long-accustomed to corporate chicanery and led by a few savvy activists working very hard for free.”

“Dark Money opens and closes with a flock of geese flying over a toxic copper quarry. As Reed’s story unfolds, we learn that the beautiful birds’ mass demise is only a tiny fraction of the wreckage caused by shady money moguls tinkering with electoral campaigns over a hundred years of Montana history. In part because its elected officials are ordinary folks who often double-up as farmers, teachers and the like, Montana is also heavy on a defiant populism that cuts across party lines. Which may be why it’s also the only state, according to Reed, to have fought back locally against the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2010 rollback of laws preventing corporations and unions using their treasury funds for electioneering.”

Image result for Riveting Documentary Sheds Light On 'Dark Money' In Montana Politics"

Skillfully fielding an enormous cast of witnesses and participants, Reed shows how Democrats and Republicans running for political and judicial office found themselves targeted by vicious attack ads from deep-pocketed non-profits with blandly vanilla names like Citizens United or Americans For Prosperity, or strategically crowd-pleasing monikers like Mothers Against Child Predators. No one had ever heard of these shape-shifting advocacy groups, and it was difficult to track the money back to the shadowy ideologues hiding behind them. With the ranks of the working press hamstrung by financial crisis, it fell to a shockingly small band of enterprising freelancers — helped by some highly compromising documents that turned up in a colorfully unlikely location — to uncover a trail of money and influence that led back to wealthy right-wing libertarians. (The Koch brothers come up a lot.)

The rest is a gripping tale of self-help sleuthing topped off by the televised trial of Art Wittich, a local State Senator accused of being on the take. John Adams, a newly laid-off local reporter who will surely be played by Woody Harrelson in the event of a narrative remake of Dark Money, founded his own dirt-digging website with help from colleagues and donations from an increasingly outraged public. Attorney Gene Jarussi came out of retirement to work pro bono on tracing the money trail connecting Republican State Senator Wittich to an anti-environmental outfit murkily titled American Tradition Partnership. But perhaps the real heroine is Sarah Arnold, a young Republican former staffer for ATP who, disgusted by her employer’s dirty tricks, agreed to testify at Wittich’s trial. Here’s hoping she has stayed safe since.”

Image result for Riveting Documentary Sheds Light On 'Dark Money' In Montana Politics"

Without the indispensable Dark Money, few of us would have heard of this David-and-Goliath struggle. Reed keeps the story mostly local while adroitly teasing out the broader threat of a lack of transparency that’s been kicking around American politics since way before Watergate. Her riveting film shows how, with the Internet’s global reach and the ever-growing concentration of money and power, dark money is redrawing the political landscape in ways that render parties irrelevant and imperil democracy itself. As one of the film’s talking heads points out, when the Supreme Court of the United States decrees that corporations have the same rights as individuals (2010 ruling of Citizens United v FEC), and financial contributions count as free speech, it is time to take the fight for democracy local, as Montana did.

For access to report: [Read More]

8 comments

  1. Dear Mz. Gronda,

    I’m going to post a link at the end of this short message, please set down your coffee or tea or any liquid you are drinking to prevent damage to you computer while reading it! If it was not such a serious issue for our nation this entire administration and the attending cartel would have made a worth while comedy series made for late night television…

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/rudy-giuliani-defends-michael-cohens-hush-money-payments-nobody-got-killed/ar-BBQXlPZ?ocid=ob-fb-enus-280

    Liked by 2 people

    • Dear Crustyolemothman,

      Rudy Giuliani is a piece of work. Mr. Giuliani has changed his stripes big time since his prosecuting days. I can only wonder if he is up to his eyeballs in all of the president’s mess on a personal basis. His judgement has gone out the window.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Gronda, thanks for the shout out and running with us. As an American citizen, efforts to allow anonymous funding is commensurate to organized cheating. It facilitates our country being run by an oligarchy, who now need not be an Amercan entity – China, Russia, Saudu Arabia can and have donated money through channels to defeat candidates. Both moderate Republicans and Democrats have stood up against these cheaters. We must shine lights on them and get Congress to pass a law to circumvent Citizens United. Keith

    Liked by 2 people

    • Dear Keith,

      This is where we have to save the GOP lawmakers from themselves. I don’t want to believe that they got into the business of being public servants to be bought, paid for and directed by the big money donors.

      If the anonymous nature of these dark monies can be eliminated/ exposed as to who/ which corporations are donating these monies those donors will be forced to deal with lots of very disgruntled consumers.

      A few protests in front of these corporate robber barons’ places of business should make the point obvious, which is that they can’t be party to attacking our US democracy with impunity.

      Hugs, Gronda

      Liked by 1 person

Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.