A fellow blogger Keith of Musingsofanoldfart.com reminded me of this story about Montana residents of both the Republican and Democratic Parties, standing up to the distributors of dark monies” from being able to dictate the politics in their state.
This explains Democratic Senator Jon Tester winning his reelection in November 2018 even though the republican President Donald Trump had personally targeted him for extinction because he single-handedly managed to derail the White House’s Dr. Ronny Jackson from being successfully appointed as the head of the US Department of Veterans Affairs.
Its a good thing that Senator Tester is still in the US senate. As per the 12/12/18 Billings Gazette report, “U.S. Sen Jon Tester wrangled just enough votes Wednesday (12/12/18) to get Senate approval for his bill to turn back a new Internal Revenue Service practice allowing nonprofits to keep the names of major donors off their books.”
“The Democratic senator from Montana, elected to this third term last month, was targeting an IRS policy shift favoring “dark money” groups. In July the IRS began advising nonprofit organizations that they no longer had to list the names of major donors — contributors of $5,000 or more — from disclosure filings.”
“Tester and other lawmakers who voted 50-49 to block the IRS, said that lack of disclosure was going to be a boon for a particular group of nonprofits that spend millions of dollars trying to shape public opinion on political issues, while stopping just shy of actually telling the electorate who to vote for.”
The Senate voted today to overthrow a new Treasury Department policy that no longer requires some 501(c) tax-exempt nonprofits, including politically active #darkmoney groups, to disclose donor names and addresses to the IRS.http://crp.org/drkdrk by @annalecta & @KarlEvers1
Senate votes to prevent “dark money” from getting even darker
The US Senate voted to overthrow a new Treasury Department policy that no longer requires “dark money” groups to disclose donor names and addresses to the IRS.
“Those election year ads that encourage voters to call an incumbent and tell them to vote no on a particular issue are typically paid for by nonprofit “social welfare” groups registered under the 501(c)(4) section of the federal tax code. And by sticking to an issue and not attacking a candidate outright, these groups avoid the stiffer reporting requirements of the Federal Election Commission.”
“Nonetheless, they’ve become a major source of election-year messaging and spending. In Montana’s 2018 Senate election, where spending reached a record $72 million, dark money groups on the left and right were big spenders.”
“The risk of the government not knowing who contributes to these nonprofits is significant, Tester said, laying out a scenario in which foreign governments and nefarious actors could anonymously fund campaigns to influence public opinion.”
“When you don’t know who’s contributing the money, how do we know it’s not the Russians, that it’s not the Saudis, or other nations that are infiltrating our elections?” Tester said in a recorded Senate floor speech. “Our adversaries are always looking for the weakest link to try to destroy our country and destroy our democracy. Today, one of our weak links is our broken campaign finance system.”
Democratic Senator from Montana and ranking member of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs Jon Tester is followed by members of the news media at the Senate subway on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. on April 24, 2018. (Michael Reynolds / EPA-EFE /REX / Shutterstock)
Here’s the rest of the story…
On July 12, 2018, Ella Taylor of the NPR penned the following article, “Riveting Documentary Sheds Light On ‘Dark Money’ In Montana Politics”
“In Dark Money, a documentary about invisible corporate shenanigans in her home state of Montana, director Kimberly Reed makes the incisive case that the latter threatens to sink our democracy outright.”
“If 98 movie minutes about the subversion of campaign financing isn’t quite your idea of beating the summer heat, let me start by saying there’s not a dull or dry moment in Reed’s briskly paced film about the secret assault on the American electoral and judicial process by corporations whose agenda is nothing less than the dismantling of government itself. Dark Money tells a hair-raisingly specific American tale of illicit power. In other words, the stuff of thrillers since Hollywood time began — except that in this muckraking expose, the graft was real. Mercifully, so was the pushback from a citizenry long-accustomed to corporate chicanery and led by a few savvy activists working very hard for free.”
“Dark Money opens and closes with a flock of geese flying over a toxic copper quarry. As Reed’s story unfolds, we learn that the beautiful birds’ mass demise is only a tiny fraction of the wreckage caused by shady money moguls tinkering with electoral campaigns over a hundred years of Montana history. In part because its elected officials are ordinary folks who often double-up as farmers, teachers and the like, Montana is also heavy on a defiant populism that cuts across party lines. Which may be why it’s also the only state, according to Reed, to have fought back locally against the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2010 rollback of laws preventing corporations and unions using their treasury funds for electioneering.”
Skillfully fielding an enormous cast of witnesses and participants, Reed shows how Democrats and Republicans running for political and judicial office found themselves targeted by vicious attack ads from deep-pocketed non-profits with blandly vanilla names like Citizens United or Americans For Prosperity, or strategically crowd-pleasing monikers like Mothers Against Child Predators. No one had ever heard of these shape-shifting advocacy groups, and it was difficult to track the money back to the shadowy ideologues hiding behind them. With the ranks of the working press hamstrung by financial crisis, it fell to a shockingly small band of enterprising freelancers — helped by some highly compromising documents that turned up in a colorfully unlikely location — to uncover a trail of money and influence that led back to wealthy right-wing libertarians. (The Koch brothers come up a lot.)
The rest is a gripping tale of self-help sleuthing topped off by the televised trial of Art Wittich, a local State Senator accused of being on the take. John Adams, a newly laid-off local reporter who will surely be played by Woody Harrelson in the event of a narrative remake of Dark Money, founded his own dirt-digging website with help from colleagues and donations from an increasingly outraged public. Attorney Gene Jarussi came out of retirement to work pro bono on tracing the money trail connecting Republican State Senator Wittich to an anti-environmental outfit murkily titled American Tradition Partnership. But perhaps the real heroine is Sarah Arnold, a young Republican former staffer for ATP who, disgusted by her employer’s dirty tricks, agreed to testify at Wittich’s trial. Here’s hoping she has stayed safe since.”
Without the indispensable Dark Money, few of us would have heard of this David-and-Goliath struggle. Reed keeps the story mostly local while adroitly teasing out the broader threat of a lack of transparency that’s been kicking around American politics since way before Watergate. Her riveting film shows how, with the Internet’s global reach and the ever-growing concentration of money and power, dark money is redrawing the political landscape in ways that render parties irrelevant and imperil democracy itself. As one of the film’s talking heads points out, when the Supreme Court of the United States decrees that corporations have the same rights as individuals (2010 ruling of Citizens United v FEC), and financial contributions count as free speech, it is time to take the fight for democracy local, as Montana did.
For access to report: [Read More]